June 2019 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Anything on Pharo that would be like Opentalk on VW?

by Norbert Hartl

> Am 25.06.2019 um 20:44 schrieb Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>: > > Hi Jerry, > > We have worked on bridging Pharo with Python. It works remarkably well. Here is the website: https://objectprofile.github.io/PythonBridge/ > We have also worked on a simple mechanism to distribute computation across multiple Pharo images. Here is the website: https://github.com/ObjectProfile/DMirror > Nice! How does the DMirror relate to the ImageWorker? https://github.com/pharo-contributions/ImageWorker Norbert > Cheers, > Alexandre > >> On Jun 23, 2019, at 11:09 PM, Jerry Kott <jkott(a)image-ware.com> wrote: >> >> I am looking at some interprocess communication with Pharo. VW has Opentalk, VASt has Sst (I think, havenât looked in a while). Does anything similar exist for Pharo? >> >> Jerry Kott >> This message has been digitally signed. >> PGP Fingerprint: >> A9181736DD2F1B6CC7CF9E51AC8514F48C0979A5 >> >> >> >

June 25, 2019

Re: [Pharo-users] Anything on Pharo that would be like Opentalk on VW?

by Alexandre Bergel

Hi Jerry, We have worked on bridging Pharo with Python. It works remarkably well. Here is the website: https://objectprofile.github.io/PythonBridge/ We have also worked on a simple mechanism to distribute computation across multiple Pharo images. Here is the website: https://github.com/ObjectProfile/DMirror Cheers, Alexandre > On Jun 23, 2019, at 11:09 PM, Jerry Kott <jkott(a)image-ware.com> wrote: > > I am looking at some interprocess communication with Pharo. VW has Opentalk, VASt has Sst (I think, havenât looked in a while). Does anything similar exist for Pharo? > > Jerry Kott > This message has been digitally signed. > PGP Fingerprint: > A9181736DD2F1B6CC7CF9E51AC8514F48C0979A5 > > >

June 25, 2019

Re: [Pharo-users] Problem with files.pharo.org

by Marcus Denker

it is working again > On 25 Jun 2019, at 17:50, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > There is a prolem with files.pharo.org <http://files.pharo.org/> at the hosting company. > > see https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/3626 <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/3626> for more infos > > Marcus

June 25, 2019

Problem with files.pharo.org

by Marcus Denker

There is a prolem with files.pharo.org <http://files.pharo.org/> at the hosting company. see https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/3626 <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/3626> for more infos Marcus

June 25, 2019

Re: [Pharo-users] Anything on Pharo that would be like Opentalk on VW?

by Petr Fischer

Look at Seamless: https://github.com/pharo-ide/Seamless Pretty powerfull - you are just using remote objects from another image like any other local object (proxying + serializing). pf > I am looking at some interprocess communication with Pharo. VW has Opentalk, VASt has Sst (I think, havenât looked in a while). Does anything similar exist for Pharo? > > Jerry Kott > This message has been digitally signed. > PGP Fingerprint: > A9181736DD2F1B6CC7CF9E51AC8514F48C0979A5 > > >

June 25, 2019

[ANN] Next Pharo Sprint: June 28

by Marcus Denker

We will organize a Pharo sprint / Moose dojo June 28, starting at 10:00am. (Local Time Paris). Goals of this sprint: - Pharo 8: Fix issues from tracker https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues Remote Sprint: Remotely, you can join us on Discord. During the sprint, we synchronize local and remote Pharo sprinters: http://pharo.org/contribute-events We have added a Board to coordinate the work: https://github.com/orgs/pharo-project/projects/9 Known Local Sprint meetings - Lille/France: It will be at the Inria Lille, Building B, third floor (RMoD offices). As the building is not open to the public, please contact us before if you plan to come A list of all Pharo Event of the year an be found here: https://association.pharo.org/events

June 24, 2019

Re: [Pharo-users] Anything on Pharo that would be like Opentalk on VW?

by askoh

I had the same quest. See the thread http://forum.world.st/Smalltalk-to-Smalltalk-interface-td5099844.html#none Aik-Siong Koh -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html

June 24, 2019

Re: [Pharo-users] Distribution of test method name length

by Kasper Osterbye

Quite interesting! I was wondering about the correlation to number of arguments due to the particularities of the keyword syntax which might give longer method names in the first place. Best, Kasper

June 24, 2019

Anything on Pharo that would be like Opentalk on VW?

by Jerry Kott

I am looking at some interprocess communication with Pharo. VW has Opentalk, VASt has Sst (I think, havenât looked in a while). Does anything similar exist for Pharo? Jerry Kott This message has been digitally signed. PGP Fingerprint: A9181736DD2F1B6CC7CF9E51AC8514F48C0979A5

June 24, 2019

Re: [Pharo-users] Distribution of test method name length

by Ben Coman

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 07:10, Jerry Kott <jkott(a)image-ware.com> wrote: > Interestingâ¦ > > I am curious about the purpose of this analysis (other than the > âinteresting-nessâ of it). Sure, some names read like sentences, but that > beats the âstrcpy()â, doesnât it? I love that in Smalltalk / Pharo, I donât > have to remember cryptic function names and can make the code optimally > verbose (if there is such a thing) to express intent. If that means a > method is rather long, so be it. > Its an offshoot of working on the Pharo Track of the Exercism project ( https://exercism.io/tracks/pharo-smalltalk) Here we generate test-method names from their canonical data "description" ( https://github.com/exercism/problem-specifications/blob/master/exercises/wo… ) The original intent of that field was to generate identifiers, but sometimes the language ends up a bit flowery and we ended up with method-name 150 character long. I am in the process of slimming these down. Someone queried me "what was a recommended identifier length" and I had no clue -- so I thought the Pharo code base would be a good source of data. Having produced the graph, I thought others might find it mildly interesting. Thats all. It may be worthwhile reviewing some of the outliers, but that was not its intent. It was shared just-for-interest. The purpose is certainly not to squeeze Pharo messages down to 6 characters ;) cheers -ben P.S. I found the graph more useful showing percentages rather than absolute count. 95% less than 50 characters 99% less than 60 characters [image: image.png]

June 24, 2019