October 2018 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] http://pharo.org/download | Pharo7 standalone?

by Cyril Ferlicot

On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 11:47 AM H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Cyril > > This is fine for Linux (e.g. > curl get.pharo.org/64/70+vm | bash ) > > But I see no indication on the page > http://get.pharo.org/ > how this works for Microsoft Windows. > Personally, I use it on git bash or cygwin or windows linux subsystem. I know it's not ideal but I get it to work like this. > --Hannes > -- Cyril Ferlicot https://ferlicot.fr

Oct. 5, 2018

Re: [Pharo-users] http://pharo.org/download | Pharo7 standalone?

by H. Hirzel

Hi Cyril This is fine for Linux (e.g. curl get.pharo.org/64/70+vm | bash ) But I see no indication on the page http://get.pharo.org/ how this works for Microsoft Windows. --Hannes On 10/5/18, Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thank you, Alistair. >> >> That worked fine for me in 64bit Ubuntu 18.04. >> >> In addition I'd like to have the same as Windows installations >> >> Windows 7 (32 bit and 64 bit) >> and Windows 10 (64bit) >> >> Is there a list of the allowed download URLs? >> > > Hi, > > http://get.pharo.org/ > >> --Hannes > > -- > Cyril Ferlicot > https://ferlicot.fr > >

Oct. 5, 2018

Re: [Pharo-users] http://pharo.org/download | Pharo7 standalone?

by Cyril Ferlicot

On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you, Alistair. > > That worked fine for me in 64bit Ubuntu 18.04. > > In addition I'd like to have the same as Windows installations > > Windows 7 (32 bit and 64 bit) > and Windows 10 (64bit) > > Is there a list of the allowed download URLs? > Hi, http://get.pharo.org/ > --Hannes -- Cyril Ferlicot https://ferlicot.fr

Oct. 5, 2018

Re: [Pharo-users] http://pharo.org/download | Pharo7 standalone?

by H. Hirzel

Thank you, Alistair. That worked fine for me in 64bit Ubuntu 18.04. In addition I'd like to have the same as Windows installations Windows 7 (32 bit and 64 bit) and Windows 10 (64bit) Is there a list of the allowed download URLs? --Hannes On 10/5/18, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Hannes, > > It depends a bit on the platform. For linux 64 bit: > > curl get.pharo.org/64/70+vm | bash > > HTH, > Alistair > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 01:28, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> The Pharo download page http://pharo.org/download offers the Pharo >> launcher with various images and a Pharo6.1 standalone download. >> >> I would like to have a Pharo 7 standalone installation. >> >> How do I do that? >> >> Thank you for the answer in advance >> >> Hannes >> > >

Oct. 5, 2018

Re: [Pharo-users] Zinc-AWS - problem writing bucket, ZnAWSS3RequestSignatureTool old or how to change authorization mechanism

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 5 Oct 2018, at 10:52, Sabine Manaa <manaa.sabine(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > I try to save data in amazon s3 by using Svens package 'Zinc-AWS'. > I created a bucket in s3 and can read it from pharo. > > But when I want to save data from pharo the requests response is > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <Error><Code>InvalidRequest</Code><Message>The authorization mechanism you have provided is not supported. Please use AWS4-HMAC-SHA256.</Message><RequestId>....</RequestId><HostId>....</HostId></Error> > > I see that ZnAWSS3RequestSignatureTool uses (HMAC on: SHA1 new). > > Here I have problems to go further and do not know if/how I have to change the authorization mechanism. > Or is the ZnAWSS3RequestSignatureTool old? Yes > Anyone having a hint or working code snippet for me? > Sven could you perhaps have a look? The code has to be updated, but I do not have time for that. It would be nice if somebody else could have a look. Sven

Oct. 5, 2018

Re: [Pharo-users] [vwnc] Parsing in Smalltalk

by Serge Stinckwich

If you have done a PRISM PP parser, maybe you can contribute it to the PP community. Thank you. On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 9:47 PM Steffen MÃ¤rcker <merkste(a)web.de> wrote: > I gave Xtreams-Parsing and PetitParser a shot and like to share my > findings.[*] > > The task was to parse the modelling language of the probabilistic model > checker PRISM. I've written a grammer of about 130 definitions in the > Xtreams DSL, which is close to Bryan Fords syntax. To avoid doing it all > again with PetitParser, I wrote a PetitParserGenerator that takes the DSL > and builds a PetitParser. > > The numbers below are just parsing times, no further actions involved. > For > reference I show the times from PRISM (which uses JavaCC), too -- > although > they involve additional verification and normalization steps on the AST. > > input Prism XP PP > 230kB 14s 9s 2s > 544kB 121s 20s 5s > 1.1MB 421s 34s 8s > 1.4MB 1091s 47s 12s > 2.2MB 63s 16s > 2.9MB 81s 20s > 3.8MB 107s 25s > 4.4MB 123s 30s > > Please note that these times are not representative at all. It's just a > single example and I put zero effort in optimization. However, I am quite > satisfied with the results. > > [*] I was already familiar with the DSL of Xtreams-Parsing, which I like > very much. I did not consider SmaCC, as I find PEGs easier to use. > > Best, Steffen > > > > Am .10.2018, 20:14 Uhr, schrieb Steffen MÃ¤rcker <merkste(a)web.de>: > > > Dear all, > > > > I have two questions regarding parsing frameworks. > > > > 1) Do you have any insights on the performance of SmaCC VS Xtreams > > Parsing VS PetitParser? > > 2) Has anybody started to port PetitParser 2 from Pharo to VW? Is it > > worth the effort? > > > > Sorry for cross-posting, I thought this might interest both communities. > > > > Cheers, Steffen > > -- Serge Stinckwic âhâ Int. Research Unit on Modelling/Simulation of Complex Systems (UMMISCO) âSorbonne University (SU) French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD)â U âniversity of YaoundÃ© Iâ, Cameroun "Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute." https://twitter.com/SergeStinckwich â

Oct. 5, 2018

Zinc-AWS - problem writing bucket, ZnAWSS3RequestSignatureTool old or how to change authorization mechanism

by Sabine Manaa

I try to save data in amazon s3 by using Svens package 'Zinc-AWS'. I created a bucket in s3 and can read it from pharo. But when I want to save data from pharo the requests response is <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <Error><Code>InvalidRequest</Code><Message>The authorization mechanism you have provided is not supported. Please use AWS4-HMAC-SHA256.</Message><RequestId>....</RequestId><HostId>....</HostId></Error> I see that ZnAWSS3RequestSignatureTool uses (HMAC on: SHA1 new). Here I have problems to go further and do not know if/how I have to change the authorization mechanism. Or is the ZnAWSS3RequestSignatureTool old? Anyone having a hint or working code snippet for me? Sven could you perhaps have a look?

Oct. 5, 2018

Re: [Pharo-users] http://pharo.org/download | Pharo7 standalone?

by Alistair Grant

Hi Hannes, It depends a bit on the platform. For linux 64 bit: curl get.pharo.org/64/70+vm | bash HTH, Alistair On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 01:28, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello > > The Pharo download page http://pharo.org/download offers the Pharo > launcher with various images and a Pharo6.1 standalone download. > > I would like to have a Pharo 7 standalone installation. > > How do I do that? > > Thank you for the answer in advance > > Hannes >

Oct. 5, 2018

Spec Layout Help

by Rob Rothwell

Hello, How might one achieve a fixed width column containing fixed width widgets within a resizable row using Spec Layouts? For example: <--- Resizable Space --->| Fixed Width |<---Resizable Space ---> Where the Fixed Width space might have something like a left justified input field and a right justified button or something. The best I can achieve is everything resizable, which Spec excels at! I have tried adding three columns to the row with the center column a fixed width (newColumn:width:), but I can't seem to get it centered. I have even tried adding dummy widgets as in the code below, which creates a resizable column taking up the first half of the space, followed by a fixed width (100) input field, followed by another resizable space (sharing the right half of the column with the fixed width column): LayoutPractice>>defaultSpec ^ SpecColumnLayout composed newRow: [:row | row newColumn: [ :col | col add: #spacer1 height: 30 ]; newColumn: [ :col | col add: #inputField height: 30] width: 100; newColumn: [ :col | col add: #spacer2 height: 30 ]; yourself ] height: 50; newRow: [:row | row add: #list ]; yourself If this is not possible, could I allow the window to resize vertically but not horizontally (I have a ListPresenter below problematic row which would be nice to resize vertically)? Thank you, Rob

Oct. 5, 2018

Re: [Pharo-users] [vwnc] Parsing in Smalltalk

by Tudor Girba

Hi, Interesting experiment. Thanks for sharing! I assume that you tried the original PetitParser. PetitParser2 offers the possibility to optimize the parser (kind of a compilation), and this provides a significant speedup: https://github.com/kursjan/petitparser2 Would you be interested in trying this out? Cheers, Doru > On Oct 4, 2018, at 10:46 PM, Steffen MÃ¤rcker <MerkSte(a)web.de> wrote: > > I gave Xtreams-Parsing and PetitParser a shot and like to share my findings.[*] > > The task was to parse the modelling language of the probabilistic model checker PRISM. I've written a grammer of about 130 definitions in the Xtreams DSL, which is close to Bryan Fords syntax. To avoid doing it all again with PetitParser, I wrote a PetitParserGenerator that takes the DSL and builds a PetitParser. > > The numbers below are just parsing times, no further actions involved. For reference I show the times from PRISM (which uses JavaCC), too -- although they involve additional verification and normalization steps on the AST. > > input Prism XP PP > 230kB 14s 9s 2s > 544kB 121s 20s 5s > 1.1MB 421s 34s 8s > 1.4MB 1091s 47s 12s > 2.2MB 63s 16s > 2.9MB 81s 20s > 3.8MB 107s 25s > 4.4MB 123s 30s > > Please note that these times are not representative at all. It's just a single example and I put zero effort in optimization. However, I am quite satisfied with the results. > > [*] I was already familiar with the DSL of Xtreams-Parsing, which I like very much. I did not consider SmaCC, as I find PEGs easier to use. > > Best, Steffen > > > > Am .10.2018, 20:14 Uhr, schrieb Steffen MÃ¤rcker <merkste(a)web.de>: > >> Dear all, >> >> I have two questions regarding parsing frameworks. >> >> 1) Do you have any insights on the performance of SmaCC VS Xtreams Parsing VS PetitParser? >> 2) Has anybody started to port PetitParser 2 from Pharo to VW? Is it worth the effort? >> >> Sorry for cross-posting, I thought this might interest both communities. >> >> Cheers, Steffen -- www.feenk.com "No matter how many recipes we know, we still value a chef."

Oct. 5, 2018