June 2017 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] ZnConstants missing 511 in default Pharo 6.0 32 image?

by Juraj Kubelka

Hi, I remember that Sven did some changes related to the constants in about month or two months ago. But, I do not think that it was integrated to the Pharo 6 release. Juraj > El 27-06-2017, a las 15:50, Tim Mackinnon <tim(a)testit.works> escribiÃ³: > > Hi - I have been slowly working my way through some of the pharo components and tutorials and when trying out ZnEasy with a password protected api, I got a talkback when I mistyped a password. > It looks like ZnConstants in a fresh Pharo 6.0 32 image excludes 511 from its constants. The code looks correct (and its defined in the initialize method - ) but when I tried a ZnEasy call which returned 511 I got a walkback showing it as an unrecognized code? (The walkback is looking for 511 in ZnConstants httpStatusCodes). > > Is there some problem in the build process, or is this some type of user error? > > Tim

June 27, 2017

Using Iceberg to edit regular text files ?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Is it possible to use Iceberg to edit regular text files directly in Pharo ? Specifically I would like to be able to edit README.md and similar files. Especially when using a all-in-one, the repo on file becomes quite hidden, and the whole idea is to hide the command line anyway, so it feels as if that should have to be possible. Maybe just open a File Browser on the right directory ? Sven PS: I also had the impression that class comment changes did not show up in the diff browser.

June 27, 2017

ZnConstants missing 511 in default Pharo 6.0 32 image?

by Tim Mackinnon

Hi - I have been slowly working my way through some of the pharo components and tutorials and when trying out ZnEasy with a password protected api, I got a talkback when I mistyped a password. It looks like ZnConstants in a fresh Pharo 6.0 32 image excludes 511 from its constants. The code looks correct (and its defined in the initialize method - ) but when I tried a ZnEasy call which returned 511 I got a walkback showing it as an unrecognized code? (The walkback is looking for 511 in ZnConstants httpStatusCodes). Is there some problem in the build process, or is this some type of user error? Tim

June 27, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo6 bootstrap how to

by Pavel Krivanek

2017-06-26 18:19 GMT+02:00 Tim Mackinnon <tim(a)testit.works>: > This is very interestingâ¦ what would you need in that image to use the > remote debugging demoâd at Pharo Days 2017 - as Iâm assuming for a server > environment with a web-app, you could have a lean core image and then > remotely attach to it to understand what was going on? With enough > infrastructure to inspect objects etc, but locally you could look up things > with GT tools? > > Or have I got the wrong end of the stick on this? > With Denis we are trying to clean all dependencies so the remote IDE will be able to work on a small headless images. Cheers, -- Pavel > > Tim > > On 26 Jun 2017, at 15:29, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > You need to do it manually. You should probably start with own copy of > BaselineOfIDE and then try to remove packages you don't need. You should do > it slowly and check if you are still able to generate a working image. > > -- Pavel > > 2017-06-26 16:09 GMT+02:00 Hilaire <hilaire(a)drgeo.eu>: > >> So in pratical term, how do you create a baseline? >> >> Hilaire >> >> Le 26/06/2017 Ã 15:43, Pavel Krivanek a Ã©crit : >> > We have the BaselineOfBasicTools that is something in the middle. It >> > already contains Workspace and Nautilus (but not GTPlayground). >> > BaselineOfIDE corresponds to the standard Pharo distribution so you will >> > not save space. You should probalby create own baseline and select what >> > you need. >> > >> > >> > >> > For the later I really want to have an easier browser, something to >> > build on GLamour, if I understand correctly. But it will be another >> > topic, later. >> > >> > >> > Glamour is part of BaselineOfIDE so you will need it or create own >> baseline. >> > >> >> -- >> Dr. Geo >> http://drgeo.eu >> >> >> > >

June 27, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo6 bootstrap how to

by Pavel Krivanek

Right now we do not have such source. -- Pavel 2017-06-26 18:42 GMT+02:00 Hilaire <hilaire(a)drgeo.eu>: > Do you have a page explaining the process so people can try out? > > Hilaire > > Le 26/06/2017 Ã 16:29, Pavel Krivanek a Ã©crit : > > You need to do it manually. You should probably start with own copy of > > BaselineOfIDE and then try to remove packages you don't need. You should > > do it slowly and check if you are still able to generate a working image. > > > > -- Pavel > > -- > Dr. Geo > http://drgeo.eu > > >

June 27, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] PharoJS

by Stephane Ducasse

Excellent but it may take some time. You can probably use the 32 bit version to start porting. On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:16 PM, askoh <askoh(a)askoh.com> wrote: > Stef: > > I hear you. I am waiting for Pharo 64bit on Windows to start porting some of > my work from VisualWorks 64bit. > > All the best, > Aik-Siong > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Re-PharoJS-tp4952267p4952642.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

June 27, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] PharoJS

by askoh

Offray: Diversity is good. But we can get too much of a good thing. For example, I see merit in VisualWorks Appex where Smalltalk and JavaScript are both managed within the System Browser. Additionally, changes to JavaScript made in the Internet browser are picked up by VisualWorks. Now, Appex allows live debugging in both front end and back end. And the combined code is maintained in VisualWorks. Craig Latta is doing something interesting with SqueakJS which is an optimized Smalltalk VM in JavaScript and HTML5. It is supposedly able to run Smalltalk fast inside the browser and access the JavaScript world freely. I think this route will benefit greatly from WebAssembly. Can PharoJS borrow some of these ideas? Pros and Cons? All the best, Aik-Siong -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Re-PharoJS-tp4952267p4952643.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 26, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] PharoJS

by askoh

Stef: I hear you. I am waiting for Pharo 64bit on Windows to start porting some of my work from VisualWorks 64bit. All the best, Aik-Siong -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Re-PharoJS-tp4952267p4952642.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 26, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo6 bootstrap how to

by Hilaire

Do you have a page explaining the process so people can try out? Hilaire Le 26/06/2017 Ã 16:29, Pavel Krivanek a Ã©crit : > You need to do it manually. You should probably start with own copy of > BaselineOfIDE and then try to remove packages you don't need. You should > do it slowly and check if you are still able to generate a working image. > > -- Pavel -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu

June 26, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo6 bootstrap how to

by Tim Mackinnon

This is very interestingâ¦ what would you need in that image to use the remote debugging demoâd at Pharo Days 2017 - as Iâm assuming for a server environment with a web-app, you could have a lean core image and then remotely attach to it to understand what was going on? With enough infrastructure to inspect objects etc, but locally you could look up things with GT tools? Or have I got the wrong end of the stick on this? Tim > On 26 Jun 2017, at 15:29, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > You need to do it manually. You should probably start with own copy of BaselineOfIDE and then try to remove packages you don't need. You should do it slowly and check if you are still able to generate a working image. > > -- Pavel > > 2017-06-26 16:09 GMT+02:00 Hilaire <hilaire(a)drgeo.eu <mailto:hilaire@drgeo.eu>>: > So in pratical term, how do you create a baseline? > > Hilaire > > Le 26/06/2017 Ã 15:43, Pavel Krivanek a Ã©crit : > > We have the BaselineOfBasicTools that is something in the middle. It > > already contains Workspace and Nautilus (but not GTPlayground). > > BaselineOfIDE corresponds to the standard Pharo distribution so you will > > not save space. You should probalby create own baseline and select what > > you need. > > > > > > > > For the later I really want to have an easier browser, something to > > build on GLamour, if I understand correctly. But it will be another > > topic, later. > > > > > > Glamour is part of BaselineOfIDE so you will need it or create own baseline. > > > > -- > Dr. Geo > http://drgeo.eu <http://drgeo.eu/> > > >

June 26, 2017