May 2017 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] pharocloud alternative

by Offray Vladimir Luna CÃ¡rdenas

Hi, I recently followed the Enterprise Pharo documentation on how to deploy my own image on my own digital ocean server. It took less that 10 minutes, from 0 to custom app on server. So, yes is not so convenient as just uploading the images, but is a good option now that Pharo Cloud is closing. Cheers, Offray On 30/05/17 05:24, Johannes Brauer wrote: > I appreciated the ease of use of pharocloud. I had to upload my pharo-image and done. > > Nevertheless, thank you for your tip, Sven > > Johannes >> Am 30.05.2017 um 12:02 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu>: >> >> >>> On 30 May 2017, at 11:46, Johannes Brauer <brauer(a)nordakademie.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am running to Pharo/Seaside apps on pharocloud. Now the service will be closed. Does anyone know a comparable alternative? >>> >>> Johannes >> You can try deploying a full server yourself, it is not as difficult as it sounds. >> >> https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/EnterprisePharoBook/lastSuccessf… >> >> The above describes how to do it on DigitalOcean which starts at $5 a month. >> >> Sven > >

May 30, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] [Seaside] Strange behaviours?

by Damien Pollet

On 30 May 2017 at 12:46, Alidra Abdelghani via Pharo-users < pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> wrote: > I did not knew about that one :) > Still, it is too bad that we have this constraint, because it is very > difficult to find the problem if you dont know about this rule already > (especially for newbies). > Hopefully, this is going to be fixed in the future. > It sure looks like a good candidate for a framework-specific critic ruleâ¦

May 30, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] [Seaside] Strange behaviours?

by Alidra Abdelghani

> On 30 May 2017, at 10:38, Johan Brichau <johan(a)inceptive.be> wrote: > > Hi Alidra, > Thanks Johan, Thanks Joachim I did not knew about that one :) Still, it is too bad that we have this constraint, because it is very difficult to find the problem if you dont know about this rule already (especially for newbies). Hopefully, this is going to be fixed in the future. > > Also, posting your questions on Seaside to the seaside mailinglist is a better idea ;)d Ok, Perfect. Regards Abdelghani > > cheers > Johan > >> On 30 May 2017, at 10:21, Alidra Abdelghani via Pharo-users <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org <mailto:pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>> wrote: >> >> >> From: Alidra Abdelghani <alidrandco(a)yahoo.fr <mailto:alidrandco@yahoo.fr>> >> Subject: [Seaside] Strange behaviours? >> Date: 30 May 2017 at 10:21:38 GMT+2 >> To: pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org <mailto:pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> >> >> >> Hi all, >> I just noticed that changing the message send order to an anchor modifies itsâ behaviour : >> >> html anchor with: aString;callback: [doSomething]. -> click on the anchor executes the callback block >> >> html anchor callback:[doSomething];with:aString. -> click on the anchor does not executes the callback block. >> >> Is this a normal behaviour? >> >> I also noticed that instantiating a WAComponent in the same method that calls html render: on it makes the call method in this object fail. See (http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Alidra/Seaside_Strange_Call_Behavior <http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Alidra/Seaside_Strange_Call_Behavior>) for an concrete example. >> BTW. I find the name call: quite confusing : you call a method, you pass control to an object. But maybe this is because I am new to Seaside. >> >> Thank you >> Abdelghani >> >> >

May 30, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] pharocloud alternative

by Johannes Brauer

I appreciated the ease of use of pharocloud. I had to upload my pharo-image and done. Nevertheless, thank you for your tip, Sven Johannes > Am 30.05.2017 um 12:02 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu>: > > >> On 30 May 2017, at 11:46, Johannes Brauer <brauer(a)nordakademie.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am running to Pharo/Seaside apps on pharocloud. Now the service will be closed. Does anyone know a comparable alternative? >> >> Johannes > > You can try deploying a full server yourself, it is not as difficult as it sounds. > > https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/EnterprisePharoBook/lastSuccessf… > > The above describes how to do it on DigitalOcean which starts at $5 a month. > > Sven

May 30, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] pharocloud alternative

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 30 May 2017, at 11:46, Johannes Brauer <brauer(a)nordakademie.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am running to Pharo/Seaside apps on pharocloud. Now the service will be closed. Does anyone know a comparable alternative? > > Johannes You can try deploying a full server yourself, it is not as difficult as it sounds. https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/EnterprisePharoBook/lastSuccessf… The above describes how to do it on DigitalOcean which starts at $5 a month. Sven

May 30, 2017

pharocloud alternative

by Johannes Brauer

Hi, I am running to Pharo/Seaside apps on pharocloud. Now the service will be closed. Does anyone know a comparable alternative? Johannes

May 30, 2017

[ANN] Pharo Sprint June 2

by Marcus Denker

Hi! This Friday will be the next Pharo Sprint! We will organize a Pharo sprint / Moose dojo June 02, starting at 10:00am. (Local Time Paris). For more infos, see: https://association.pharo.org/event-2492490 Marcus

May 30, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] [Seaside] Strange behaviours?

by Johan Brichau

Hi Alidra, See here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42653378/message-order-cascading-on-htm… <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42653378/message-order-cascading-on-htm…> Also, posting your questions on Seaside to the seaside mailinglist is a better idea ;)d cheers Johan > On 30 May 2017, at 10:21, Alidra Abdelghani via Pharo-users <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> wrote: > > > From: Alidra Abdelghani <alidrandco(a)yahoo.fr> > Subject: [Seaside] Strange behaviours? > Date: 30 May 2017 at 10:21:38 GMT+2 > To: pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org > > > Hi all, > I just noticed that changing the message send order to an anchor modifies itsâ behaviour : > > html anchor with: aString;callback: [doSomething]. -> click on the anchor executes the callback block > > html anchor callback:[doSomething];with:aString. -> click on the anchor does not executes the callback block. > > Is this a normal behaviour? > > I also noticed that instantiating a WAComponent in the same method that calls html render: on it makes the call method in this object fail. See (http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Alidra/Seaside_Strange_Call_Behavior <http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Alidra/Seaside_Strange_Call_Behavior>) for an concrete example. > BTW. I find the name call: quite confusing : you call a method, you pass control to an object. But maybe this is because I am new to Seaside. > > Thank you > Abdelghani > >

May 30, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] [Seaside] Strange behaviours?

by jtuchel＠objektfabrik.de

Am 30.05.17 um 10:21 schrieb Alidra Abdelghani via Pharo-users: Alidra, it is a well documented "weirdness" of Seaside that #with: always has to be the last send to an element. I forgot about the details... Joachim

May 30, 2017

[Seaside] Strange behaviours?

by Alidra Abdelghani

Hi all, I just noticed that changing the message send order to an anchor modifies itsâ behaviour : html anchor with: aString;callback: [doSomething]. -> click on the anchor executes the callback block html anchor callback:[doSomething];with:aString. -> click on the anchor does not executes the callback block. Is this a normal behaviour? I also noticed that instantiating a WAComponent in the same method that calls html render: on it makes the call method in this object fail. See (http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Alidra/Seaside_Strange_Call_Behavior <http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Alidra/Seaside_Strange_Call_Behavior>) for an concrete example. BTW. I find the name call: quite confusing : you call a method, you pass control to an object. But maybe this is because I am new to Seaside. Thank you Abdelghani

May 30, 2017