March 2017 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Seaside : including a static stylesheet.

by Dominique Dartois

Hi Sabine. It does not seem working for me I have found this directory here "/Users/Dom/Documents/Library/WebServer/Documents" and I tried : updateRoot: anHtmlRoot super updateRoot: anHtmlRoot. anHtmlRoot stylesheet url: 'http://localhost:8080/Library/WebServer/Documents/columnal.css'. The style sheet is not found. I keep on trying. Regards --- Dominique ________________________________ De : Pharo-users <pharo-users-bounces(a)lists.pharo.org> de la part de Sabine Manaa <manaa.sabine(a)gmail.com> EnvoyÃ© : mardi 7 mars 2017 10:08:33 Ã : Any question about pharo is welcome Objet : Re: [Pharo-users] Seaside : including a static stylesheet. Hi Dominique, for some cases I also use static files on my local machine, the root directory of the local machines web server is /Library/WebServer/Documents perhaps this is what you are looking for. regards Sabine 2017-02-28 18:53 GMT+01:00 Dominique Dartois <dom(a)dartois.org<mailto:dom@dartois.org>>: In the Seaside book, chapter 17.2 I read I can include a stylesheet this way : updateRoot: anHtmlRoot super updateRoot: anHtmlRoot. anHtmlRoot stylesheet url: 'http://seaside.st/styles/main.css' On my development machine (macOS) I use http://localhost:8080/myApp as the server address and I donât know the root directory of the Seaside integrated web server. Can anyone help me to find this directory? Thanks. --- Dominique Dartois

March 7, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo Spur 64 VM

by stepharong

March 7, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] couchdb integration?

by stepharong

March 7, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo Spur 64 VM

by HernÃ¡n Morales Durand

I am learning a lot about this (raising money). Now if someone wants to work together to get funding (for developing/updating the Windows VM) please let me know so we can evaluate alternatives. HernÃ¡n 2017-03-07 15:24 GMT-03:00 stepharong <stepharong(a)free.fr>: > Yes we know that we should improve the windows part. > We agree. Now I do not know how to create money. > > Stef > > Just asking, > > Did someone already tried to get funding to update the Windows VM? > Because it's like the 90% of the world still uses Windows... > > Regards, > > HernÃ¡n > > > > 2017-03-02 12:51 GMT-03:00 ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com>: > >> Hi Raffaello, >> >> Reportedly, the VM without the JIT (pure interpreter, also called PharoS >> or StackVM) works on windows 64 and FFI works with it if the VM compiled >> with clang but not with gcc. There is no configuration for Pharo right now. >> It should not be hard to add a pharo configuration to have the image >> start-up, but I don't think several libraries such as Athens/Cairo or >> libgit would work out of the box, so it's not clear such a configuration >> would make a lot of sense. There is no PharoS-spur64 repository on >> files.pharo.org right now either. >> >> Windows support is not ready mostly because: >> - Some C types are different in x64 between Unix and windows >> - Calling conventions are different in x64 bits between Unix and Windows >> >> Calling conventions have impact in switching between the interpreter and >> the JIT runtime and in FFI. >> C types being different have impact for the VM compilation and in FFI. >> >> If someone looks into it, I guess in a day of work we could have the >> Stack VM working with Spur 64 for Pharo without support for some >> librairies. There might be uncommon crashes to fix over the first week of >> use. With several more weeks of work (maybe a couple months), the StackVM >> with all libraries should be production-ready. The JIT support will take >> more time, hopefully it will be done in a year from now. >> >> Maybe I should mention that the company who funded 64 bits support is >> using the VM on Mac for development and Linux for production, so Windows >> was not a priority and not done. We have to rely on open-source >> contributors, non paid, to add Windows support and that takes time. Nicolas >> Cellier added the support for the 64 bits Stack VM on his free time. If >> someone is investing money, the 64 bits Windows VM could reach production >> sooner (I guess within 6 months) because someone could work full time on it. >> >> Regards, >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:04 PM, <raffaello.giulietti(a)lifeware.ch> wrote: >> >>> On 07/02/17 07:13, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>> > >>> >> On 6 Feb 2017, at 21:41, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Le 06/02/2017 Ã 21:31, Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users a Ã©crit : >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Hi! >>> >> >>> >> IIRC, the windows VM will need some more time to be ready. Only Linux >>> >> and OSX ones are usable at the moment. >>> > >>> > ^ this. >>> > as Cyril says, win 64bits vm is still not ready (and it will take some >>> more time to be). >>> > >>> > Esteban >>> > >>> >>> >>> Just for general curiosity, what are the main stumbling blocks in the >>> road to a Windows 64 bit Pharo? >>> >>> >>> Raffaello >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ >

March 7, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] couchdb integration?

by stepharong

Yes there was a package Igor did one long time ago. > Hi, > > Does anyone know if there any CouchDB integration in Pharo? > > For example, I would be interested if there is any Pharo implementation > for the CouchDB Replication Protocol: > http://docs.couchdb.org/en/master/replication/protocol.html > > Cheers, > Doru > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > www.feenk.com > > "In a world where everything is moving ever faster, > one might have better chances to win by moving slower." > > > > > -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

March 7, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo Spur 64 VM

by stepharong

Yes we know that we should improve the windows part. We agree. Now I do not know how to create money. Stef > Just asking, > > Did someone already tried to get funding to update the Windows VM? > Because it's like the 90% of the world still uses Windows... > > Regards, > > HernÃ¡n > > > > 2017-03-02 12:51 GMT-03:00 ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com>: >> Hi Raffaello, >> >> Reportedly, the VM without the JIT (pure interpreter, also called >> PharoS or StackVM) works on windows 64 and FFI works with it if the VM >> compiled with clang but not with gcc. >>There is no configuration for >> Pharo right now. It should not be hard to add a pharo configuration to >> have the image start-up, but I don't think several libraries such as >> Athens/>>Cairo or libgit would work out of the box, so it's not clear >> such a configuration would make a lot of sense. There is no >> PharoS-spur64 repository on files.pharo.org right now >>either. >> Windows support is not ready mostly because: >> - Some C types are different in x64 between Unix and windows >> - Calling conventions are different in x64 bits between Unix and Windows >> >> Calling conventions have impact in switching between the interpreter >> and the JIT runtime and in FFI. >> C types being different have impact for the VM compilation and in FFI. >> >> If someone looks into it, I guess in a day of work we could have the >> Stack VM working with Spur 64 for Pharo without support for some >> librairies. There might be uncommon >>crashes to fix over the first >> week of use. With several more weeks of work (maybe a couple months), >> the StackVM with all libraries should be production-ready. The JIT >> support >>will take more time, hopefully it will be done in a year from >> now. >> >> Maybe I should mention that the company who funded 64 bits support is >> using the VM on Mac for development and Linux for production, so >> Windows was not a priority and >>not done. We have to rely on >> open-source contributors, non paid, to add Windows support and that >> takes time. Nicolas Cellier added the support for the 64 bits Stack VM >> on >>his free time. If someone is investing money, the 64 bits Windows >> VM could reach production sooner (I guess within 6 months) because >> someone could work full time on it. >> >> Regards, >> >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:04 PM, <raffaello.giulietti(a)lifeware.ch> wrote: >>> On 07/02/17 07:13, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 21:41, Cyril Ferlicot D. >>>>> <cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Le 06/02/2017 Ã 21:31, Benoit St-Jean via Pharo-users a Ã©crit : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >>>>> IIRC, the windows VM will need some more time to be ready. Only Linux >>>>> and OSX ones are usable at the moment. >>>> >>>> ^ this. >>>> as Cyril says, win 64bits vm is still not ready (and it will take >>>> some more time to be). >>>> >>>> Esteban >>>> >>> >>> >>> Just for general curiosity, what are the main stumbling blocks in the >>> road to a Windows 64 bit Pharo? >>> >>> >>> Raffaello >>> >>> >> > -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

March 7, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] Convert Markdown to Pillar?

by Dimitris Chloupis

Well the simplest way is to write it markdown and then use a converter like Pandadoc to convert markdown to latex. You can inline latex in Pillar if you want to convert Latex to Pillar you will have to use an emacs mode that Damien made that converts Latex to Pillar. I have converted a ton of Latex to Pillar with the emacs mode that saved me a ton of time when I was porting PBE to Pharo 4 and to pillar (original PBE was completely written in Latex). On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 6:56 PM sergio ruiz <sergio.rrd(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Just wondering if this is possible. Just about every stand alone editor > allows users to edit or export to markdown. I tend to do everything in a > standalone editor when getting written material ready for publishing to the > web. > > I donât have any beef with pillar, i just want to be able to write using a > separate tool. > > thanks! > > > ---- > peace, > sergio > photographer, journalist, visionary > > Public Key: http://bit.ly/29z9fG0 > #BitMessage BM-NBaswViL21xqgg9STRJjaJaUoyiNe2dV > http://www.Village-Buzz.com > http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com > http://www.coffee-black.com > http://www.painlessfrugality.com > http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 > http://www.facebook.com/sergio101 >

March 7, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] Convert Markdown to Pillar?

by Damien Pollet

Should be possible, but that would involve writing a markdown to pillar converter :) The other way around already exists, but the conversion is lossy; from markdown to pillar it should be possible to maintain most of the semantics. On 7 March 2017 at 17:55, sergio ruiz <sergio.rrd(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Just wondering if this is possible. Just about every stand alone editor > allows users to edit or export to markdown. I tend to do everything in a > standalone editor when getting written material ready for publishing to the > web. > > I donât have any beef with pillar, i just want to be able to write using a > separate tool. > > thanks! > > > ---- > peace, > sergio > photographer, journalist, visionary > > Public Key: http://bit.ly/29z9fG0 > #BitMessage BM-NBaswViL21xqgg9STRJjaJaUoyiNe2dV > http://www.Village-Buzz.com > http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com > http://www.coffee-black.com > http://www.painlessfrugality.com > http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 > http://www.facebook.com/sergio101 >

March 7, 2017

Convert Markdown to Pillar?

by sergio ruiz

Just wondering if this is possible. Just about every stand alone editor allows users to edit or export to markdown. I tend to do everything in a standalone editor when getting written material ready for publishing to the web. I donât have any beef with pillar, i just want to be able to write using a separate tool. thanks! ---- peace, sergio photographer, journalist, visionary Public Key:Â http://bit.ly/29z9fG0 #BitMessageÂ BM-NBaswViL21xqgg9STRJjaJaUoyiNe2dV http://www.Village-Buzz.com http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com http://www.coffee-black.com http://www.painlessfrugality.com http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 http://www.facebook.com/sergio101

March 7, 2017

Re: [Pharo-users] [State Machine] Looking for some examples.

by sergio ruiz

Oooooh.. that looks like a good call!Â thanks! On March 7, 2017 at 12:21:12 AM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand (hernan.morales(a)gmail.com) wrote: I never used StateMachine, but a really cool package with some examples is SState: http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~MasashiUmezawa/SState Cheers, HernÃ¡n 2017-03-07 1:14 GMT-03:00 sergio ruiz <sergio.rrd(a)gmail.com>: Hey, all.. Just wondering if anyone had any resources for examples of using StateMachine package in Pharo.Â I am looking at it, and looked at the tests, but am not finding a really clear example on how this works. Ideas? Thanks! ---- peace, sergio photographer, journalist, visionary Public Key:Â http://bit.ly/29z9fG0 #BitMessageÂ BM-NBaswViL21xqgg9STRJjaJaUoyiNe2dV http://www.Village-Buzz.com http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com http://www.coffee-black.com http://www.painlessfrugality.com http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 http://www.facebook.com/sergio101 ---- peace, sergio photographer, journalist, visionary Public Key:Â http://bit.ly/29z9fG0 #BitMessageÂ BM-NBaswViL21xqgg9STRJjaJaUoyiNe2dV http://www.Village-Buzz.com http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com http://www.coffee-black.com http://www.painlessfrugality.com http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 http://www.facebook.com/sergio101

March 7, 2017