July 2016 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Provide a mapping for a collection of <Association>s in NeoJSON

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

> On 01 Jul 2016, at 11:27, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > btw, why NeoJSON is not deprecated in benefit of STON? Although there is obviously a relation between the two (STON is inspired by JSON, STON has some basic backward compatibility with JSON, same project style, same author), there are also differences. JSON is by definition much simpler and much more limited (no type info for objects, no complex structures like shared and circular references) while STON was designed specifically to cover those. JSON needs much more explicit mapping support to deal with anything except for simple maps and lists. In terms of documentation, the API, it would confuse the hell out of regular JSON users to see things mixed up with STON which they are probably not interested in at all. I think this last point might even be the most important one. > Esteban > >> On 01 Jul 2016, at 08:52, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: >> >> Thanks sven >> >> I was thinking to add a section in the chapter but I will wait for your solution. >> >> >> stef >> >> >> Le 1/7/16 Ã 00:56, Sven Van Caekenberghe a Ã©crit : >>> Hi, >>> >>> Yes, object properties in JSON are not ordered, by definition. But for humans it can make sense. >>> Converting your domain objects to OrderedDictionaries or overwriting #neoJSONOn: are valid ways to control NeoJSON. >>> >>> However, I also think that it might be possible to solve the ordering requirement with a regular mapping, provided I make a little internal change - I will investigate that and report back. >>> >>> Sven >>> >>>> On 30 Jun 2016, at 17:29, PBKResearch <peter(a)pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>> Bernardo >>>> Thanks for this. After sending my previous mail, I did what I should have done first and looked at list of collection objects in the system browser. So I discovered OrderedDictionary for the first time. I am pleased to see that this is the key to the solution. >>>> Peter >>>> From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras >>>> Sent: 30 June 2016 16:17 >>>> To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Provide a mapping for a collection of <Association>s in NeoJSON >>>> Peter, >>>> i had the same issue, i couldn't find the way to do it, but i hack my own writing like this >>>> NDBFood>>neoJsonOn: neoJSONWriter >>>> "custom writing" >>>> neoJSONWriter >>>> writeMap: >>>> (OrderedDictionary new >>>> add: 'ndb_no' -> ndbno; >>>> add: 'full_name' -> name; >>>> add: 'food_group' -> fg; >>>> add: 'factors' -> self factors; >>>> add: 'nutrients' -> self nutrients; >>>> yourself) >>>> i just implement my own writing for my objects. >>>> HTH >>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:06 PM, PBKResearch <peter(a)pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote: >>>>> Hello >>>>> I have recently used NeoJSON for the first time. All went pretty well, but I would like to make a small tweak to the output, which probably involves defining a mapping. I have read through the information in the NeoJSON pdf, and also looked at the class comments, but I am a bit lost. Could Sven or anyone please give me a hint? >>>>> What I want is to construct a JSON object as a Pharo dictionary, but then control the order in which the fields are output to the JSON file. Clearly the order is irrelevant for a computer, but it could be helpful to a human reader to put them in an order which reflects the way humans think about the objects. The keys of a dictionary are of course unordered, so this is not possible, but if we step back a bit we see that a dictionary is often constructed from a collection of associations; if we could stop at this stage, and have a mapping which outputs the associations in the order in which they appear in the collection, this would give the control I am looking for. >>>>> Am I talking nonsense, or is there any way of implementing this using NeoJSON mappings? >>>>> Best wishes >>>>> Peter Kenny >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bernardo E.C. >>>> Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. >>> >>> >> >> > >

July 1, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [UFFI] Getting an array of opaque structures filled

by Esteban Lorenzano

Hi, an opaque structure is not an FFIExternalObject but an FFIOpaqueObject. in that case, something like (simplified): ctx := (your context). list := FFIOpaqueObject new. size := self getDevice: ctx list: list. getDevice: ctx list: list ^ self ffiCall: #(size_t libusb_get_device_list (libusb_context *ctx, FFIOpaqueObject ***list)) should work (note that of course you can make libusb_device an alias for your typeâ¦ that does not matters much, this is just a simplification). if this does not works, if you can provide me code to reproduce it, I can give it a shot and see what happens :) Esteban > On 01 Jul 2016, at 11:19, Julien Delplanque <julien(a)tamere.eu> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I have a question about the UFFI API. I have the following function: > > ssize_t libusb_get_device_list (libusb_context *ctx, libusb_device ***list) > > where libusb_device is an opaque structure. > > I made a type mapping "ssize_t" -> "int" and an object inheriting > from FFIExternalObject for the "libusb_context" (others methods > using it are working). > > I can not find how to get an array filled with libusb_device using UFFI from Pharo. :-( > > Thanks in advance, > > Julien >

July 1, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Provide a mapping for a collection of <Association>s in NeoJSON

by Esteban Lorenzano

btw, why NeoJSON is not deprecated in benefit of STON? Esteban > On 01 Jul 2016, at 08:52, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > Thanks sven > > I was thinking to add a section in the chapter but I will wait for your solution. > > > stef > > > Le 1/7/16 Ã 00:56, Sven Van Caekenberghe a Ã©crit : >> Hi, >> >> Yes, object properties in JSON are not ordered, by definition. But for humans it can make sense. >> Converting your domain objects to OrderedDictionaries or overwriting #neoJSONOn: are valid ways to control NeoJSON. >> >> However, I also think that it might be possible to solve the ordering requirement with a regular mapping, provided I make a little internal change - I will investigate that and report back. >> >> Sven >> >>> On 30 Jun 2016, at 17:29, PBKResearch <peter(a)pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>> Bernardo >>> Thanks for this. After sending my previous mail, I did what I should have done first and looked at list of collection objects in the system browser. So I discovered OrderedDictionary for the first time. I am pleased to see that this is the key to the solution. >>> Peter >>> From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras >>> Sent: 30 June 2016 16:17 >>> To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Provide a mapping for a collection of <Association>s in NeoJSON >>> Peter, >>> i had the same issue, i couldn't find the way to do it, but i hack my own writing like this >>> NDBFood>>neoJsonOn: neoJSONWriter >>> "custom writing" >>> neoJSONWriter >>> writeMap: >>> (OrderedDictionary new >>> add: 'ndb_no' -> ndbno; >>> add: 'full_name' -> name; >>> add: 'food_group' -> fg; >>> add: 'factors' -> self factors; >>> add: 'nutrients' -> self nutrients; >>> yourself) >>> i just implement my own writing for my objects. >>> HTH >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:06 PM, PBKResearch <peter(a)pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote: >>>> Hello >>>> I have recently used NeoJSON for the first time. All went pretty well, but I would like to make a small tweak to the output, which probably involves defining a mapping. I have read through the information in the NeoJSON pdf, and also looked at the class comments, but I am a bit lost. Could Sven or anyone please give me a hint? >>>> What I want is to construct a JSON object as a Pharo dictionary, but then control the order in which the fields are output to the JSON file. Clearly the order is irrelevant for a computer, but it could be helpful to a human reader to put them in an order which reflects the way humans think about the objects. The keys of a dictionary are of course unordered, so this is not possible, but if we step back a bit we see that a dictionary is often constructed from a collection of associations; if we could stop at this stage, and have a mapping which outputs the associations in the order in which they appear in the collection, this would give the control I am looking for. >>>> Am I talking nonsense, or is there any way of implementing this using NeoJSON mappings? >>>> Best wishes >>>> Peter Kenny >>> >>> -- >>> Bernardo E.C. >>> Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. >> >> > >

July 1, 2016

[UFFI] Getting an array of opaque structures filled

by Julien Delplanque

Hello everyone, I have a question about the UFFI API. I have the following function: ssize_t libusb_get_device_list (libusb_context *ctx, libusb_device ***list) where libusb_device is an opaque structure. I made a type mapping "ssize_t" -> "int" and an object inheriting from FFIExternalObject for the "libusb_context" (others methods using it are working). I can not find how to get an array filled with libusb_device using UFFI from Pharo. :-( Thanks in advance, Julien

July 1, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Spec Documentation case 18653

by Johan Fabry

I will take care of this next week when I am in Lille. -- Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I donât mean to be rude! Please see http://emailcharter.org . Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile > On Jul 1, 2016, at 04:37, Marion Noirbent <ms.noirbent(a)etudiant.univ-lille1.fr> wrote: > > I have create the case 18653 Spec documentation to integrate the > comments of classes. > I have create a slice with the comments I have wroten and save it in the > inbox. > But the slice is not complete because there are lot of things I didn't > understand about Spec. > I haven't resolve the case. > > Now I would like : > - someone review what I have done > - someone complete what I couldn't do > - someone resolve the case when it will be ready > > The text behind indicates the work needed on all classes I have modified. > > For my part, I will try to resolves some critics and create some tests. > > > > Le 01/07/2016 09:14, stepharo a Ã©crit : >> Thanks marion >> >> Do not send zipped files because people will not save and unzip >> attachments. >> >> So I'm trying to understand what you mean? >> >> Did you create some issues on fogzbug? >> >> What has been published in 18653? >> >> What do you want from us? >> >> What is the next step? >> >> >> >> Some of examples refered in the documentation can be found in the >> package Spec-BuildUIWithSpec. It contains examples in the book "Building >> UI with Spec" but it is not finished, so it could change a lot >> (structure, adding content, refactoring others examples, ...) but >> refered examples should be stable. >> >> >> REFACTOR >> ======== >> >> * Package >> I have moved what wasn't really widgets from Spec-core-widget to >> Spec-core-widget-support or Spec-core-support. >> >> * AbstractFormButtonModel >> I have create the abstract class AbstractFormButtonModel to remove code >> duplication beetween CheckboxModel and RadioButtonModel. >> >> * TextInputFieldModel >> I have removed the instance variable alwaysAccept that didn't have >> accessors and was not initialized. >> >> >> DOCUMENTATION >> ============= >> >> Spec-core >> --------- >> >> * ComposableModel >> The documentation is split in three part. There is two todo. >> >> I haven't found how work hide and windowIcon: , I don't know build a >> window accepting cancelled to test it. >> >> >> * AbstractWidgetModel >> One todo (3 elements) >> I haven't found how work defaultColor and color. >> >> borderWidth and borderColor have strange behaviour, it seems depend of >> its subclass (even if it not define again). ButtonModel don't make it >> appear but it work with the checkbox. >> >> Reproduce : >> >> | button checkBox | >> button := ButtonModel new. >> button >> openWithSpec; >> label: 'Click me'; >> borderWidth: 5; >> borderColor: Color red. >> >> checkBox := CheckBoxModel new. >> checkBox >> label: 'Click me'; >> openWithSpec; >> borderWidth: 5; >> borderColor: Color red. >> >> Result : borderWidthborderColor.png >> I have try to put it in a ComposableModel too. >> >> >> * DynamicComposableModel >> One todo (2 elements) >> >> >> Spec-Core-Support >> ------------------------- >> >> * SpecFocusOrder >> No todo, need review. >> >> >> Spec-Core-Widgets-Support >> ------------------------- >> >> * AbstractFormButtonModel >> No todo, need review. >> >> * RadioButtonGroup >> One todo (1 element) >> >> >> Spec-core-widget >> ---------------- >> >> * ButtonModel >> One todo >> >> * CheckboxModel >> One todo (3 elements) >> I haven't found how work labelOnLeft and labelOnRight, and labelClickable. >> >> * ImageModel >> No todo, need review. >> >> * LabelModel >> One todo (1 element) >> >> * ListModel >> One todo >> >> * IconListModel >> One todo (1 element) >> >> * MenuGroupModel >> One todo >> >> * MenuItemModel >> One todo >> >> * MenuModel >> One todo >> >> * RadioButtonGroupModel >> One todo (1 element) >> I have previously create this class from RadioButtonGroup (renaming it) >> so there is code duplication between them. >> >> * RadioButtonModel >> No todo, need review. >> >> * SliderModel >> One todo (1 element) >> >> * TextModel >> The biggest todo >> I have try to comment some parts in ScrollSyncExample to try scrollValue >> but the scroll keep working. >> >> * TextInputFieldModel >> One todo >> >> >> > >

July 1, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Spec Documentation case 18653

by Marion Noirbent

I have create the case 18653 Spec documentation to integrate the comments of classes. I have create a slice with the comments I have wroten and save it in the inbox. But the slice is not complete because there are lot of things I didn't understand about Spec. I haven't resolve the case. Now I would like : - someone review what I have done - someone complete what I couldn't do - someone resolve the case when it will be ready The text behind indicates the work needed on all classes I have modified. For my part, I will try to resolves some critics and create some tests. Le 01/07/2016 09:14, stepharo a Ã©crit : > Thanks marion > > Do not send zipped files because people will not save and unzip > attachments. > > So I'm trying to understand what you mean? > > Did you create some issues on fogzbug? > > What has been published in 18653? > > What do you want from us? > > What is the next step? > > > > Some of examples refered in the documentation can be found in the > package Spec-BuildUIWithSpec. It contains examples in the book "Building > UI with Spec" but it is not finished, so it could change a lot > (structure, adding content, refactoring others examples, ...) but > refered examples should be stable. > > > REFACTOR > ======== > > * Package > I have moved what wasn't really widgets from Spec-core-widget to > Spec-core-widget-support or Spec-core-support. > > * AbstractFormButtonModel > I have create the abstract class AbstractFormButtonModel to remove code > duplication beetween CheckboxModel and RadioButtonModel. > > * TextInputFieldModel > I have removed the instance variable alwaysAccept that didn't have > accessors and was not initialized. > > > DOCUMENTATION > ============= > > Spec-core > --------- > > * ComposableModel > The documentation is split in three part. There is two todo. > > I haven't found how work hide and windowIcon: , I don't know build a > window accepting cancelled to test it. > > > * AbstractWidgetModel > One todo (3 elements) > I haven't found how work defaultColor and color. > > borderWidth and borderColor have strange behaviour, it seems depend of > its subclass (even if it not define again). ButtonModel don't make it > appear but it work with the checkbox. > > Reproduce : > > | button checkBox | > button := ButtonModel new. > button > openWithSpec; > label: 'Click me'; > borderWidth: 5; > borderColor: Color red. > > checkBox := CheckBoxModel new. > checkBox > label: 'Click me'; > openWithSpec; > borderWidth: 5; > borderColor: Color red. > > Result : borderWidthborderColor.png > I have try to put it in a ComposableModel too. > > > * DynamicComposableModel > One todo (2 elements) > > > Spec-Core-Support > ------------------------- > > * SpecFocusOrder > No todo, need review. > > > Spec-Core-Widgets-Support > ------------------------- > > * AbstractFormButtonModel > No todo, need review. > > * RadioButtonGroup > One todo (1 element) > > > Spec-core-widget > ---------------- > > * ButtonModel > One todo > > * CheckboxModel > One todo (3 elements) > I haven't found how work labelOnLeft and labelOnRight, and labelClickable. > > * ImageModel > No todo, need review. > > * LabelModel > One todo (1 element) > > * ListModel > One todo > > * IconListModel > One todo (1 element) > > * MenuGroupModel > One todo > > * MenuItemModel > One todo > > * MenuModel > One todo > > * RadioButtonGroupModel > One todo (1 element) > I have previously create this class from RadioButtonGroup (renaming it) > so there is code duplication between them. > > * RadioButtonModel > No todo, need review. > > * SliderModel > One todo (1 element) > > * TextModel > The biggest todo > I have try to comment some parts in ScrollSyncExample to try scrollValue > but the scroll keep working. > > * TextInputFieldModel > One todo > > >

July 1, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Spec Documentation case 18653

by stepharo

Thanks marion Do not send zipped files because people will not save and unzip attachments. So I'm trying to understand what you mean? Did you create some issues on fogzbug? What has been published in 18653? What do you want from us? What is the next step? Some of examples refered in the documentation can be found in the package Spec-BuildUIWithSpec. It contains examples in the book "Building UI with Spec" but it is not finished, so it could change a lot (structure, adding content, refactoring others examples, ...) but refered examples should be stable. REFACTOR ======== * Package I have moved what wasn't really widgets from Spec-core-widget to Spec-core-widget-support or Spec-core-support. * AbstractFormButtonModel I have create the abstract class AbstractFormButtonModel to remove code duplication beetween CheckboxModel and RadioButtonModel. * TextInputFieldModel I have removed the instance variable alwaysAccept that didn't have accessors and was not initialized. DOCUMENTATION ============= Spec-core --------- * ComposableModel The documentation is split in three part. There is two todo. I haven't found how work hide and windowIcon: , I don't know build a window accepting cancelled to test it. * AbstractWidgetModel One todo (3 elements) I haven't found how work defaultColor and color. borderWidth and borderColor have strange behaviour, it seems depend of its subclass (even if it not define again). ButtonModel don't make it appear but it work with the checkbox. Reproduce : | button checkBox | button := ButtonModel new. button openWithSpec; label: 'Click me'; borderWidth: 5; borderColor: Color red. checkBox := CheckBoxModel new. checkBox label: 'Click me'; openWithSpec; borderWidth: 5; borderColor: Color red. Result : borderWidthborderColor.png I have try to put it in a ComposableModel too. * DynamicComposableModel One todo (2 elements) Spec-Core-Support ------------------------- * SpecFocusOrder No todo, need review. Spec-Core-Widgets-Support ------------------------- * AbstractFormButtonModel No todo, need review. * RadioButtonGroup One todo (1 element) Spec-core-widget ---------------- * ButtonModel One todo * CheckboxModel One todo (3 elements) I haven't found how work labelOnLeft and labelOnRight, and labelClickable. * ImageModel No todo, need review. * LabelModel One todo (1 element) * ListModel One todo * IconListModel One todo (1 element) * MenuGroupModel One todo * MenuItemModel One todo * MenuModel One todo * RadioButtonGroupModel One todo (1 element) I have previously create this class from RadioButtonGroup (renaming it) so there is code duplication between them. * RadioButtonModel No todo, need review. * SliderModel One todo (1 element) * TextModel The biggest todo I have try to comment some parts in ScrollSyncExample to try scrollValue but the scroll keep working. * TextInputFieldModel One todo

July 1, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Provide a mapping for a collection of <Association>s in NeoJSON

by stepharo

Thanks sven I was thinking to add a section in the chapter but I will wait for your solution. stef Le 1/7/16 Ã 00:56, Sven Van Caekenberghe a Ã©crit : > Hi, > > Yes, object properties in JSON are not ordered, by definition. But for humans it can make sense. > > Converting your domain objects to OrderedDictionaries or overwriting #neoJSONOn: are valid ways to control NeoJSON. > > However, I also think that it might be possible to solve the ordering requirement with a regular mapping, provided I make a little internal change - I will investigate that and report back. > > Sven > >> On 30 Jun 2016, at 17:29, PBKResearch <peter(a)pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Bernardo >> >> Thanks for this. After sending my previous mail, I did what I should have done first and looked at list of collection objects in the system browser. So I discovered OrderedDictionary for the first time. I am pleased to see that this is the key to the solution. >> >> Peter >> >> From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras >> Sent: 30 June 2016 16:17 >> To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Provide a mapping for a collection of <Association>s in NeoJSON >> >> Peter, >> i had the same issue, i couldn't find the way to do it, but i hack my own writing like this >> >> NDBFood>>neoJsonOn: neoJSONWriter >> "custom writing" >> >> neoJSONWriter >> writeMap: >> (OrderedDictionary new >> add: 'ndb_no' -> ndbno; >> add: 'full_name' -> name; >> add: 'food_group' -> fg; >> add: 'factors' -> self factors; >> add: 'nutrients' -> self nutrients; >> yourself) >> >> i just implement my own writing for my objects. >> >> HTH >> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:06 PM, PBKResearch <peter(a)pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> I have recently used NeoJSON for the first time. All went pretty well, but I would like to make a small tweak to the output, which probably involves defining a mapping. I have read through the information in the NeoJSON pdf, and also looked at the class comments, but I am a bit lost. Could Sven or anyone please give me a hint? >>> >>> What I want is to construct a JSON object as a Pharo dictionary, but then control the order in which the fields are output to the JSON file. Clearly the order is irrelevant for a computer, but it could be helpful to a human reader to put them in an order which reflects the way humans think about the objects. The keys of a dictionary are of course unordered, so this is not possible, but if we step back a bit we see that a dictionary is often constructed from a collection of associations; if we could stop at this stage, and have a mapping which outputs the associations in the order in which they appear in the collection, this would give the control I am looking for. >>> >>> Am I talking nonsense, or is there any way of implementing this using NeoJSON mappings? >>> >>> Best wishes >>> >>> Peter Kenny >> >> >> -- >> Bernardo E.C. >> >> Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America. > >

July 1, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] SQLite + JSON support via UDBCSQLite3 in Pharo

by Offray Vladimir Luna CÃ¡rdenas

Hi Ben, Yes I tryed with the -m32 flag and I ldd confirms the use of 32 bit libraries on my system: ldd sqlite3 linux-gate.so.1 (0xf7744000) libpthread.so.0 => /usr/lib32/libpthread.so.0 (0xf76e9000) libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib32/libdl.so.2 (0xf76e4000) libc.so.6 => /usr/lib32/libc.so.6 (0xf752f000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xf7745000) Anyway, I'm working with NeoJSON and is working pretty well. Thanks, Offray On 30/06/16 21:18, Ben Coman wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Offray Vladimir Luna CÃ¡rdenas > <offray.luna(a)mutabit.com <mailto:offray.luna@mutabit.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have finished my dummy data mock ups as you can see below (or in > [1][2] ) > > > [1] > https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/pipermail/moose-dev/2016-June/025799.html > > [2] https://offray.withknown.com/2016/data-selfie-dummy > > Now I'm ready to start injecting real data into them. Because data > comes from a JSON dump, I would like to use the JSON1 extension of > SQLite, [3][4], which means compiling it by myself from SQLite > amalgamation and putting the binary in a place where UDBCSQLite3 > is aware of it. I'm on a Linux 64 bits machine and I have sqlite2 > 32 bits binary from the distro repositories. When I linked the > distro provided binary to the image location, UDBCSQLite3 works > fine (but precompiled binary doesn't have JSON1 extension > enabled), but when I put there my compiled binary with JSON1 > support instead, UDBC complains about "external module not found". > How can I made UDBCSQLite3 aware of my compiled binary ? > > [3] https://www.sqlite.org/json1.html > > [4] http://www.samadhiweb.com/blog/2016.04.24.sqlite.json.html > > Thanks, > > Offray > > > Did you do something like...? > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3501878/force-gcc-to-compile-32-bit-prog… > > cheers -ben

July 1, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] SQLite + JSON support via UDBCSQLite3 in Pharo

by Offray Vladimir Luna CÃ¡rdenas

Hi, For the moment it seems that Pharo + SQLite3 + JSON1 will not be needed. NeoJSON is making an excellent work for querying the JSON file. By the way, I was testing with Punqlite and the installation process is very friendly. It even load the unqlite.so and puts it in the proper location (but I'm using NeoJSON just fine). Cheers, Offray On 30/06/16 11:49, Offray Vladimir Luna CÃ¡rdenas wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have finished my dummy data mock ups as you can see below (or in > [1][2] ) > > > [1] > https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/pipermail/moose-dev/2016-June/025799.html > > [2] https://offray.withknown.com/2016/data-selfie-dummy > > Now I'm ready to start injecting real data into them. Because data > comes from a JSON dump, I would like to use the JSON1 extension of > SQLite, [3][4], which means compiling it by myself from SQLite > amalgamation and putting the binary in a place where UDBCSQLite3 is > aware of it. I'm on a Linux 64 bits machine and I have sqlite2 32 bits > binary from the distro repositories. When I linked the distro provided > binary to the image location, UDBCSQLite3 works fine (but precompiled > binary doesn't have JSON1 extension enabled), but when I put there my > compiled binary with JSON1 support instead, UDBC complains about > "external module not found". How can I made UDBCSQLite3 aware of my > compiled binary ? > > [3] https://www.sqlite.org/json1.html > > [4] http://www.samadhiweb.com/blog/2016.04.24.sqlite.json.html > > Thanks, > > Offray >

July 1, 2016