June 2016 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalkhub & Squeaksource3

by Dale Henrichs

On 06/15/2016 10:06 AM, Mark Bratcher wrote: > A couple of easy ones: > > 1) Does smalltalkhub.com <http://smalltalkhub.com> support private > projects (used, e.g., for CI)? I've seen a couple of posts on random > forums dating back a couple of years indicating that it did, but when > I went to create a project, I didn't see an option to make it private. > > 2) Is Squeaksource 3 (http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss) currently > maintained? It still says "public alpha" and latest comments anywhere > or submissions to their tracker are old. Who is the current owner? SqueakSource3 is hosted by GemTalk Systems and we continue to make daily backups and keep the system up and running. The latest version of SqueakSource3 is being maintained by Tobias Pape and is currently in production at HPI. SqueakSource3 is "frozen as an alpha", because the SS3 alpha was turned on a month or so before the plan to create SmalltalkHub was announced at which time I stopped development on SS3 expecting SS3 to eventually be turned off ... unfortunately SmalltalkHub was late going into production and I was asked to please start doing daily backups and make SS3 available until SmalltalkHub came on-line ... IIRC it took somewhere around a year for SmalltalkHub to come on-line and by that time it was "too late" to simply turn off SS3. I have moved on to use Git and GitHub as a public source code repository and we at GemTalk Systems continue to run SS3 as a courtesy to the community There have been periodic plans to either upgrade SS3 or replace SS3 with an up-to-date version of SqueakSource over the years, but the user community seems to be satisfied with the status quo and the system has been pretty stable over the years. If volunteers step forward to drive an effort to upgrade/replace SS3 I would be completely supportive of the effort, but I don't have the cycles to lead such an effort. Dale

June 15, 2016

Any OpenGL working Pharo 5 Linux (Fedora)?????

by Casimiro - GMAIL

Starting new project. Is there any OpenGL framework working in Pharo 5 Linux (Fedora 64 with x86 libraries) ???? Thnx Casimiro -- The information contained in this message is confidential and intended to the recipients specified in the headers. If you received this message by error, notify the sender immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copy or alteration of this message are strictly forbidden and subjected to civil and criminal sanctions. == This email may be signed using PGP key *ID: 0x4134A417*

June 15, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] The #compile: selector

by Mark Bratcher

Brilliant. Thank you! Sent from TypeApp On Jun 15, 2016, 2:28 PM, at 2:28 PM, Henrik Nergaard <henrik.nergaard(a)uia.no> wrote: >SomeClass compile: 'foo ^ ''foo''' classified: #accessor > >Best regards, >Henrik > >From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org] On >Behalf Of Mark Bratcher >Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:06 PM >To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> >Subject: [Pharo-users] The #compile: selector > >When using the #compile: selector to dynamically create a selector, is >there a way (e.g., a pragma) to specify the category for the dynamic >selector in a way that Pharo will see it? I tried, for example: > >s := String new writeStream. >s nextPutAll: 'foo' ; cr ; nextPutAll: ' <category: ''accessor''>' ; >cr ; nextPutAll: ' ^fooVar' ; cr. >Foo compile: s contents. > >Which created the following selector just fine: > >foo > <categor: 'accessor'> > ^ fooVar > >But Pharo considers it uncategorized. I'm just wondering if it's >possible. > >Thanks >Mark

June 15, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] The #compile: selector

by Henrik Nergaard

SomeClass compile: 'foo ^ ''foo''' classified: #accessor Best regards, Henrik From: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of Mark Bratcher Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:06 PM To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> Subject: [Pharo-users] The #compile: selector When using the #compile: selector to dynamically create a selector, is there a way (e.g., a pragma) to specify the category for the dynamic selector in a way that Pharo will see it? I tried, for example: s := String new writeStream. s nextPutAll: 'foo' ; cr ; nextPutAll: ' <category: ''accessor''>' ; cr ; nextPutAll: ' ^fooVar' ; cr. Foo compile: s contents. Which created the following selector just fine: foo <categor: 'accessor'> ^ fooVar But Pharo considers it uncategorized. I'm just wondering if it's possible. Thanks Mark

June 15, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalkhub & Squeaksource3

by Mark Bratcher

Great. So how do you make a project private in sthub? Sent from TypeApp On Jun 15, 2016, 2:19 PM, at 2:19 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >yes, they are > >> On 15 Jun 2016, at 20:08, Mark Bratcher <mdbratch(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, I know there are alternatives. SS3 actually allows private >projects and I've started using it. But favor seems to be toward >smalltalkhub. My question is specifically about smalltalkhub and >whether private projects are possible there. >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Peter Uhnak <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com ><mailto:i.uhnak@gmail.com>> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:06:08PM -0400, Mark Bratcher wrote: >> > A couple of easy ones: >> > >> > 1) Does smalltalkhub.com <http://smalltalkhub.com/> support private >projects (used, e.g., for CI)? >> > I've seen a couple of posts on random forums dating back a couple >of years >> > indicating that it did, but when I went to create a project, I >didn't see >> > an option to make it private. >> >> I don't know about sthub/ss3, but BitBucket offers free private >projects, so you can use that. >> >> Peter >> >>

June 15, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalkhub & Squeaksource3

by Esteban Lorenzano

yes, they are > On 15 Jun 2016, at 20:08, Mark Bratcher <mdbratch(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, I know there are alternatives. SS3 actually allows private projects and I've started using it. But favor seems to be toward smalltalkhub. My question is specifically about smalltalkhub and whether private projects are possible there. > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Peter Uhnak <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com <mailto:i.uhnak@gmail.com>> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:06:08PM -0400, Mark Bratcher wrote: > > A couple of easy ones: > > > > 1) Does smalltalkhub.com <http://smalltalkhub.com/> support private projects (used, e.g., for CI)? > > I've seen a couple of posts on random forums dating back a couple of years > > indicating that it did, but when I went to create a project, I didn't see > > an option to make it private. > > I don't know about sthub/ss3, but BitBucket offers free private projects, so you can use that. > > Peter > >

June 15, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalkhub & Squeaksource3

by Mark Bratcher

Yes, I know there are alternatives. SS3 actually allows private projects and I've started using it. But favor seems to be toward smalltalkhub. My question is specifically about smalltalkhub and whether private projects are possible there. On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Peter Uhnak <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:06:08PM -0400, Mark Bratcher wrote: > > A couple of easy ones: > > > > 1) Does smalltalkhub.com support private projects (used, e.g., for CI)? > > I've seen a couple of posts on random forums dating back a couple of > years > > indicating that it did, but when I went to create a project, I didn't see > > an option to make it private. > > I don't know about sthub/ss3, but BitBucket offers free private projects, > so you can use that. > > Peter > >

June 15, 2016

The #compile: selector

by Mark Bratcher

When using the #compile: selector to dynamically create a selector, is there a way (e.g., a pragma) to specify the category for the dynamic selector in a way that Pharo will see it? I tried, for example: s := String new writeStream. s nextPutAll: 'foo' ; cr ; nextPutAll: ' <category: ''accessor''>' ; cr ; nextPutAll: ' ^fooVar' ; cr. Foo compile: s contents. Which created the following selector just fine: foo <categor: 'accessor'> ^ fooVar But Pharo considers it uncategorized. I'm just wondering if it's possible. Thanks Mark

June 15, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalkhub & Squeaksource3

by Peter Uhnak

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:06:08PM -0400, Mark Bratcher wrote: > A couple of easy ones: > > 1) Does smalltalkhub.com support private projects (used, e.g., for CI)? > I've seen a couple of posts on random forums dating back a couple of years > indicating that it did, but when I went to create a project, I didn't see > an option to make it private. I don't know about sthub/ss3, but BitBucket offers free private projects, so you can use that. Peter

June 15, 2016

Smalltalkhub & Squeaksource3

by Mark Bratcher

A couple of easy ones: 1) Does smalltalkhub.com support private projects (used, e.g., for CI)? I've seen a couple of posts on random forums dating back a couple of years indicating that it did, but when I went to create a project, I didn't see an option to make it private. 2) Is Squeaksource 3 (http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss) currently maintained? It still says "public alpha" and latest comments anywhere or submissions to their tracker are old. Who is the current owner? Thanks Mark

June 15, 2016