March 2016 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] [Moose-dev] [Pharo-dev] Spotter Survey

by Alexandre Bergel

> "How many different kinds of searches (e.g., senders, implementors, classes â¦) are you performing using Spotter?" > > I often search for classes and methods, and I think most people only do this. What are "more than 10" kind of searches? I am looking for Roassal examples, searching in previous playground contents, searching in the catalog, looking for implementor scoped in a particular class or packages, â¦ Alexandre

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Spotter Survey

by Peter UhnÃ¡k

> > I often search for classes and methods, and I think most people only do > this. What are "more than 10" kind of searches? GTSpotter>>spotter*For: (and I use 9-ish of them atm, although classes & methods are still the primary use case) But the discoverability is not great. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Martin BÃ¤hr < mbaehr(a)email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Excerpts from Nicolai Hess's message of 2016-03-29 11:02:19 +0200: > > Hi, some questions are unclear to me: > > > > What does this question means: > > "Did you use Spotter before?" > > > > before what? > > Before I took this survey? > > try answering "no" and see what happens ;-) > > > For the dive-in feature, I would answer something like: > > I find the feature useful, but it often gives irrelevant results. > > so the feature itself is not irrelevant, but the results are... > > greetings, martin. > > -- > eKita - the online platform for your entire academic > life > -- > chief engineer > eKita.co > pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net > societyserver.org > secretary > beijinglug.org > mentor > fossasia.org > foresight developer foresightlinux.org > realss.com > unix sysadmin > Martin BÃ¤hr working in china > http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/ > >

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Additional Pomodoro features

by Stephan Eggermont

On 29-03-16 10:38, phil-xfc0EfG9EVpKErsXAC5tcw(a)public.gmane.org wrote: > Still not able to send to Smalltalkhub? Done Stephan

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Metacello] about required list

by Christophe Demarey

> Le 28 mars 2016 Ã 22:36, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs(a)gemtalksystems.com> a Ã©crit : > > Stef, > > You don't need to repeat packages in the requires statement. Requiring 'Math-DistributionGamma' is sufficient to pick up 'Math-Core', 'Math-DHB-Numerical', 'Math-Series', and 'Math-Core-Distribution' as requirements as well â¦ . Indeed but it is a bad practice. If 'Math-DistributionBetaâ has direct dependencies to 'Math-Core', 'Math-DHB-Numerical', 'Math-Series', and 'Math-Core-Distributionâ, they should be expressed. Else, you will end up with a configuration with missing requirements. ex: if I update 'Math-DistributionGammaâ and do no depend anymore on 'Math-Seriesâ for example. I will remove 'Math-Seriesâ from 'Math-DistributionGammaâ requirements. Then, I end with a missing dependency for 'Math-DistributionBetaâ. What you could do is to define a group with 'Math-Core', 'Math-DHB-Numerical', 'Math-Series', and 'Math-Core-Distributionâ if it makes senses for your business logic. Then, both 'Math-DistributionGammaâ and 'Math-DistributionBetaâ could add this group as requirement. Note that factorization of dependencies is not always a good idea. If dependencies you want to factorize have nothing to do all together, itâs better to avoid to group them because they will change many times. Christophe

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Spotter Survey

by Martin BÃ¤hr

Excerpts from Nicolai Hess's message of 2016-03-29 11:02:19 +0200: > Hi, some questions are unclear to me: > > What does this question means: > "Did you use Spotter before?" > > before what? > Before I took this survey? try answering "no" and see what happens ;-) > For the dive-in feature, I would answer something like: > I find the feature useful, but it often gives irrelevant results. so the feature itself is not irrelevant, but the results are... greetings, martin. -- eKita - the online platform for your entire academic life -- chief engineer eKita.co pike programmer pike.lysator.liu.se caudium.net societyserver.org secretary beijinglug.org mentor fossasia.org foresight developer foresightlinux.org realss.com unix sysadmin Martin BÃ¤hr working in china http://societyserver.org/mbaehr/

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Spotter Survey

by Nicolai Hess

2016-03-29 10:17 GMT+02:00 Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com>: > Hello everybody, > > We are conducting a small survey about Spotter. > It would help us if you would complete the survey at: > http://spotter.limequery.com/index.php/216683/lang-en > > We will use the data from this survey both in a research tasks and to > help us to further improve Spotter. > The survey should take you less than 5 minutes to complete. > > Thanks for your help! > Hi, some questions are unclear to me: What does this question means: "Did you use Spotter before?" before what? Before I took this survey? The answers to "I find the following features from Spotter: " "Sometimes useful" "Sometimes irrelevant" aren't exclusions. For the dive-in feature, I would answer something like: I find the feature useful, but it often gives irrelevant results. "How many different kinds of searches (e.g., senders, implementors, classes â¦) are you performing using Spotter?" I often search for classes and methods, and I think most people only do this. What are "more than 10" kind of searches? > > Cheers, > Andrei >

March 29, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] Additional Pomodoro features

by phil＠highoctane.be

Still not able to send to Smalltalkhub? Phil On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Stephan Eggermont <stephan(a)stack.nl> wrote: > Close window > Minimize to taskbar > Pause -> Red > Ready -> Green > Taskbar button countdown > Taskbar menu start stop pause and close > > Couldn't write to the repo, and not everything > is as clean as it should be > > Stephan > >

March 29, 2016

Spotter Survey

by Andrei Chis

Hello everybody, We are conducting a small survey about Spotter. It would help us if you would complete the survey at: http://spotter.limequery.com/index.php/216683/lang-en We will use the data from this survey both in a research tasks and to help us to further improve Spotter. The survey should take you less than 5 minutes to complete. Thanks for your help! Cheers, Andrei

March 29, 2016

Additional Pomodoro features

by Stephan Eggermont

Close window Minimize to taskbar Pause -> Red Ready -> Green Taskbar button countdown Taskbar menu start stop pause and close Couldn't write to the repo, and not everything is as clean as it should be Stephan

March 28, 2016

Re: [Pharo-users] [Metacello] about required list

by Dale Henrichs

Stef, You don't need to repeat packages in the requires statement. Requiring 'Math-DistributionGamma' is sufficient to pick up 'Math-Core', 'Math-DHB-Numerical', 'Math-Series', and 'Math-Core-Distribution' as requirements as well ... . Dale On 03/26/2016 02:00 PM, stepharo wrote: > Hi > > using the dependency analyser I see that may packages have the > following dependencies > > for example > > package: 'Math-DistributionGamma' with: [ spec requires: > #('Math-Core' 'Math-DHB-Numerical' 'Math-Series' > 'Math-Core-Distribution') ]; > > package: 'Math-DistributionBeta' with: [ spec requires: > #('Math-DistributionGamma' 'Math-Core' 'Math-Core-Distribution' > 'Math-DHB-Numerical' 'Math-Series') ]; > > so I wrote the requirement this way > > > Now does it have an impact on Metacello and should I keep only the > direct depend. > > > package: 'Math-DistributionBeta' with: [ spec requires: > #('Math-DistributionGamma' ) ]; > > This is annoying because I have 50 packages and doing that manually is > a pain. > > Stef > >

March 28, 2016