July 2015 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] [OT] Bill Gross: The single biggest reason why startups succeed

by Dimitris Chloupis

for me as a beginner a big turn off was the quality of documentation and my fear that third party libraries will not be that well supported because of the size of the community meaning more bugs less features etc. It was certainly a much bigger struggle learning pharo than learning python. After 2 years Pharo has gotten much better in both areas. I can't blame people who try Pharo and are turned off by these things, but I still recommend it for at least giving it a try. In my case because I have found an easy way to combine python with pharo made it easy to move to pharo. I still love to work with Pharo and its getting better each year because of the passion of people behind this and of course their hard work. I also like to support a project that follows my taste on how I like to code , even if its not that popular. Actually its easier to feel that you make a difference in a small community. Something tells me I will be sticking around for a long long time :) I dont think there is a secret to success or a simple advice. I once read that "success" is name of the tip of an iceberg called "constant failure". [image: success.jpg] On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:25 PM stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > Hi esteban > > we need to be much much better one talking to external libraries. > Our esteban is working on it. > > Stef > > Le 23/7/15 18:52, Esteban A. Maringolo a Ã©crit : > > Peter, > At your joung age you might have very good reasons to have chosen Pharo > over anything else as I did a lot of years ago. I discovered Smaltalk by > chance when I was 21 years old and already had my years developing with > Perl and was starting to learn Java. Fortunately I started making a living > out of it since I was 22 until today. > > But if you want to make the community bigger you have to look into why > people don't chose it, otherwise we'll be "preaching to the choir" as we > many times are. > > These days FP is on the bull trend, having been there way before than > Smalltalk (Lisp, Haskell, etc. and their reincarnations Clojure, Scala...). > What makes them popular most of the times is not the techology per se, but > who uses it. > > Regards! > > > Esteban A. Maringolo > > 2015-07-23 13:06 GMT-03:00 Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com>: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo < >> emaringolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> When I talk to "new programmers" (20-25 years old), almost all of them >>> don't get attracted by it. >>> Why? I couldn't tell. Mainly because they can't use the few >>> tools/patterns they already learnt how to, barely, use. >>> >> >> As someone who (still) falls into this range I see several (unrelated) >> reasons why they might not like it. >> >> For me personally I encountered Pharo in University in "Conceptual >> modeling" class, where it was introduced pretty much as "Oh, by the way, >> here is this completely new environment that you've never seen nor worked >> with that we will use, but we will not tell you much about it"... so my >> first experience was quite awful. I mean... I couldn't even write the code >> in my favorite text editor and I had to use this weird browser where system >> code and my own code were mangled up. Image crashing meant I lost my work. >> Now I know I can just replay changes but I didn't know it back then (the >> focus of the class was modeling, not Pharo). Bugs (this was Pharo 2 (and 3 >> beta)) were commonplace and since I had no experience I couldn't tell >> whether it was my fault or the system's fault... it was overall very >> unpleasant. >> I later (after the course) basically foced myself to look at Pharo again >> because I didn't understand why would people bother to use it... so clearly >> there must have been some value I've missed. And I don't regret that >> decision a bit, but I had to go look for it. So statistically speaking from >> the year I did the class only two or three students (to my knowledge) kept >> their interest out of 119 (so 2-3% maybe). Other years were no different. >> Next year there will be a dedicated class for Pharo so I'm curious if >> this will change somehow. >> >> But there may be other reasons why students may not like it... (looking >> again from my experience) >> From university experience perspective, the previous year (for us, and >> from what I talked with people it's not that different also for other >> universities) was a heavy massage in C and C++ where we were implementing >> very basic concepts (hashtables, and other data structures). A year where >> your main concern was to pass a automated checking system... so mostly >> memory management and creating write-only code. Plus warped concepts of OOP >> (so to use actual student quotes: "C++ is great for explaining OOP", "You >> can do OOP in pure C", or "OOP is useless, long confusing code, full of >> getters and setters, .. and slow. Inline assembler is much faster"). So >> with such concepts it's hard to give them OOP language, because they >> already made up their mind. >> >> Yet another reason I can see might be that when you are young you are >> more inclined to follow what's cool and modern and popular and shit (or has >> the word "game" in its name). >> So if today's world revolves around connectivity, internet, JavaScript >> and whatnot, then giving them a isolated environment with non-mainstream >> technology and a dead language they've never heard of (I thought that >> Smalltalk was an obscure language that died in '80s, before I found that >> actually it's alive and doing quite well) will not be met well with >> appreciation. >> >> But no reason to stop there... there market for Smalltalk is arguably >> small, so people will prefer language that is in demand by the market >> (after all, I pay my bills with JavaScript/PHP/webstuff, and not Pharo; >> because it's much easier to find a job; with Pharo I would have to >> basically start my own business to be profitable and then I would be doing >> business and not programming). >> >> And last (but not least), finding support for it is much harder, since >> the community is smaller. So it's almost all or nothing scenario. >> >> Also some of the arguments here can be applied also for functional >> programming (which I haven't (shame on me) even engaged with, besides >> messing with Haskell in XMonad (and multi-paradigm languages that have some >> functional concepts). >> >> Finally I don't think that you should expect the same behavior from >> young people (<26) as from adults. They will have different values, views, >> and whatnot... I mean that's the point of growing up and acquiring >> experience. All you can do is offer this alternative option and provide >> support. Being mainstream or non-mainstream is akin to self-fulfilling >> prophecy. (Of course exceptions happen, JavaScript was raised to glory >> because the language happen to be in the right place (browser) at the right >> time (boom of modern web)). >> >> Hmm... and this post ended up being much chaotic and longer than I >> intended to... but whatever. >> >> Peter >> >> p.s.: I like the music analogy since I was listening to k-pop while >> working (webtech), and now I am listening to ambient music when writing >> about Pharo :p >> >> > >

July 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Semantics of #resignalAs:

by Norbert Hartl

You get a debugger at the position if the halt in the code. Meaning the exception block run more than once. And it would run forever. Norbert > Am 23.07.2015 um 18:46 schrieb Joachim Tuchel <jtuchel(a)objektfabrik.de>: > > Norbert, > > Sorry if this is a stupid question: what does the debugger say? > > I mean, assuming NotFound is an Exception, I'd expect a debugger showing a NotFound Error... > > Joachim > > Am 23.07.2015 18:34 schrieb Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>: >> >> >>> Am 23.07.2015 um 17:54 schrieb Joachim Tuchel <jtuchel(a)objektfabrik.de>: >>> >>> Norbert, >>> >>> I'd say you get a NotFound Exception. >> In pharo you get a debugger. Meaning this piece of code is actively an endless loop. >> >> Norbert >> >>> Joachim >>> >>> >>> >>>> Am 23.07.2015 um 16:20 schrieb Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>: >>>> >>>> What are the semantics of Exception>>#resignalAs: regarding active exception handler? Isn't the active exception handler excluded from being treated again? Taking the example >>>> >>>> | counter | >>>> counter := 0. >>>> [ 1/0 ] >>>> on: Error >>>> do: [ :e | >>>> counter := counter + 1. >>>> counter > 1 ifTrue: [ self halt ]. >>>> e resignalAs: NotFound new ]. >>>> >>>> should it just run and end? Or should the debugger pop up? >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> Norbert >> >> >>

July 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] [OT] Bill Gross: The single biggest reason why startups succeed

by stepharo

Hi esteban we need to be much much better one talking to external libraries. Our esteban is working on it. Stef Le 23/7/15 18:52, Esteban A. Maringolo a Ã©crit : > Peter, > At your joung age you might have very good reasons to have chosen > Pharo over anything else as I did a lot of years ago. I discovered > Smaltalk by chance when I was 21 years old and already had my years > developing with Perl and was starting to learn Java. Fortunately I > started making a living out of it since I was 22 until today. > > But if you want to make the community bigger you have to look into why > people don't chose it, otherwise we'll be "preaching to the choir" as > we many times are. > > These days FP is on the bull trend, having been there way before than > Smalltalk (Lisp, Haskell, etc. and their reincarnations Clojure, > Scala...). What makes them popular most of the times is not the > techology per se, but who uses it. > > Regards! > > > Esteban A. Maringolo > > 2015-07-23 13:06 GMT-03:00 Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com > <mailto:i.uhnak@gmail.com>>: > > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo > <emaringolo(a)gmail.com <mailto:emaringolo@gmail.com>> wrote: > > When I talk to "new programmers" (20-25 years old), almost all > of them don't get attracted by it. > Why? I couldn't tell. Mainly because they can't use the few > tools/patterns they already learnt how to, barely, use. > > > As someone who (still) falls into this range I see several > (unrelated) reasons why they might not like it. > > For me personally I encountered Pharo in University in "Conceptual > modeling" class, where it was introduced pretty much as "Oh, by > the way, here is this completely new environment that you've never > seen nor worked with that we will use, but we will not tell you > much about it"... so my first experience was quite awful. I > mean... I couldn't even write the code in my favorite text editor > and I had to use this weird browser where system code and my own > code were mangled up. Image crashing meant I lost my work. Now I > know I can just replay changes but I didn't know it back then (the > focus of the class was modeling, not Pharo). Bugs (this was Pharo > 2 (and 3 beta)) were commonplace and since I had no experience I > couldn't tell whether it was my fault or the system's fault... it > was overall very unpleasant. > I later (after the course) basically foced myself to look at Pharo > again because I didn't understand why would people bother to use > it... so clearly there must have been some value I've missed. And > I don't regret that decision a bit, but I had to go look for it. > So statistically speaking from the year I did the class only two > or three students (to my knowledge) kept their interest out of 119 > (so 2-3% maybe). Other years were no different. > Next year there will be a dedicated class for Pharo so I'm curious > if this will change somehow. > > But there may be other reasons why students may not like it... > (looking again from my experience) > From university experience perspective, the previous year (for us, > and from what I talked with people it's not that different also > for other universities) was a heavy massage in C and C++ where we > were implementing very basic concepts (hashtables, and other data > structures). A year where your main concern was to pass a > automated checking system... so mostly memory management and > creating write-only code. Plus warped concepts of OOP (so to use > actual student quotes: "C++ is great for explaining OOP", "You can > do OOP in pure C", or "OOP is useless, long confusing code, full > of getters and setters, .. and slow. Inline assembler is much > faster"). So with such concepts it's hard to give them OOP > language, because they already made up their mind. > > Yet another reason I can see might be that when you are young you > are more inclined to follow what's cool and modern and popular and > shit (or has the word "game" in its name). > So if today's world revolves around connectivity, internet, > JavaScript and whatnot, then giving them a isolated environment > with non-mainstream technology and a dead language they've never > heard of (I thought that Smalltalk was an obscure language that > died in '80s, before I found that actually it's alive and doing > quite well) will not be met well with appreciation. > > But no reason to stop there... there market for Smalltalk is > arguably small, so people will prefer language that is in demand > by the market (after all, I pay my bills with > JavaScript/PHP/webstuff, and not Pharo; because it's much easier > to find a job; with Pharo I would have to basically start my own > business to be profitable and then I would be doing business and > not programming). > > And last (but not least), finding support for it is much harder, > since the community is smaller. So it's almost all or nothing > scenario. > > Also some of the arguments here can be applied also for functional > programming (which I haven't (shame on me) even engaged with, > besides messing with Haskell in XMonad (and multi-paradigm > languages that have some functional concepts). > > Finally I don't think that you should expect the same behavior > from young people (<26) as from adults. They will have different > values, views, and whatnot... I mean that's the point of growing > up and acquiring experience. All you can do is offer this > alternative option and provide support. Being mainstream or > non-mainstream is akin to self-fulfilling prophecy. (Of course > exceptions happen, JavaScript was raised to glory because the > language happen to be in the right place (browser) at the right > time (boom of modern web)). > > Hmm... and this post ended up being much chaotic and longer than I > intended to... but whatever. > > Peter > > p.s.: I like the music analogy since I was listening to k-pop > while working (webtech), and now I am listening to ambient music > when writing about Pharo :p > >

July 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] [OT] Bill Gross: The single biggest reason why startups succeed

by stepharo

> totally. it is exactly the feeling i have about smalltalk and lisp. > i learned both because i wanted to know if the newer languages everyone is > using are really any better. i'd expected that they would learn and improve > over older languages. but i had to discover that that's not the case. > > i used to believe that languages like python, ruby and pike were a new > generation of languages that improved over the old languages like c and c++, > but i was disappointed and had to find out that the innovation already happened > a few decades earlier and almost everything else following was a step backwards > in some ways. :) This is why we should continue to rethink our tools, frameworks, process

July 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] [OT] Bill Gross: The single biggest reason why startups succeed

by Esteban A. Maringolo

Peter, At your joung age you might have very good reasons to have chosen Pharo over anything else as I did a lot of years ago. I discovered Smaltalk by chance when I was 21 years old and already had my years developing with Perl and was starting to learn Java. Fortunately I started making a living out of it since I was 22 until today. But if you want to make the community bigger you have to look into why people don't chose it, otherwise we'll be "preaching to the choir" as we many times are. These days FP is on the bull trend, having been there way before than Smalltalk (Lisp, Haskell, etc. and their reincarnations Clojure, Scala...). What makes them popular most of the times is not the techology per se, but who uses it. Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo 2015-07-23 13:06 GMT-03:00 Peter UhnÃ¡k <i.uhnak(a)gmail.com>: > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo < > emaringolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> When I talk to "new programmers" (20-25 years old), almost all of them >> don't get attracted by it. >> Why? I couldn't tell. Mainly because they can't use the few >> tools/patterns they already learnt how to, barely, use. >> > > As someone who (still) falls into this range I see several (unrelated) > reasons why they might not like it. > > For me personally I encountered Pharo in University in "Conceptual > modeling" class, where it was introduced pretty much as "Oh, by the way, > here is this completely new environment that you've never seen nor worked > with that we will use, but we will not tell you much about it"... so my > first experience was quite awful. I mean... I couldn't even write the code > in my favorite text editor and I had to use this weird browser where system > code and my own code were mangled up. Image crashing meant I lost my work. > Now I know I can just replay changes but I didn't know it back then (the > focus of the class was modeling, not Pharo). Bugs (this was Pharo 2 (and 3 > beta)) were commonplace and since I had no experience I couldn't tell > whether it was my fault or the system's fault... it was overall very > unpleasant. > I later (after the course) basically foced myself to look at Pharo again > because I didn't understand why would people bother to use it... so clearly > there must have been some value I've missed. And I don't regret that > decision a bit, but I had to go look for it. So statistically speaking from > the year I did the class only two or three students (to my knowledge) kept > their interest out of 119 (so 2-3% maybe). Other years were no different. > Next year there will be a dedicated class for Pharo so I'm curious if this > will change somehow. > > But there may be other reasons why students may not like it... (looking > again from my experience) > From university experience perspective, the previous year (for us, and > from what I talked with people it's not that different also for other > universities) was a heavy massage in C and C++ where we were implementing > very basic concepts (hashtables, and other data structures). A year where > your main concern was to pass a automated checking system... so mostly > memory management and creating write-only code. Plus warped concepts of OOP > (so to use actual student quotes: "C++ is great for explaining OOP", "You > can do OOP in pure C", or "OOP is useless, long confusing code, full of > getters and setters, .. and slow. Inline assembler is much faster"). So > with such concepts it's hard to give them OOP language, because they > already made up their mind. > > Yet another reason I can see might be that when you are young you are more > inclined to follow what's cool and modern and popular and shit (or has the > word "game" in its name). > So if today's world revolves around connectivity, internet, JavaScript and > whatnot, then giving them a isolated environment with non-mainstream > technology and a dead language they've never heard of (I thought that > Smalltalk was an obscure language that died in '80s, before I found that > actually it's alive and doing quite well) will not be met well with > appreciation. > > But no reason to stop there... there market for Smalltalk is arguably > small, so people will prefer language that is in demand by the market > (after all, I pay my bills with JavaScript/PHP/webstuff, and not Pharo; > because it's much easier to find a job; with Pharo I would have to > basically start my own business to be profitable and then I would be doing > business and not programming). > > And last (but not least), finding support for it is much harder, since the > community is smaller. So it's almost all or nothing scenario. > > Also some of the arguments here can be applied also for functional > programming (which I haven't (shame on me) even engaged with, besides > messing with Haskell in XMonad (and multi-paradigm languages that have some > functional concepts). > > Finally I don't think that you should expect the same behavior from young > people (<26) as from adults. They will have different values, views, and > whatnot... I mean that's the point of growing up and acquiring experience. > All you can do is offer this alternative option and provide support. Being > mainstream or non-mainstream is akin to self-fulfilling prophecy. (Of > course exceptions happen, JavaScript was raised to glory because the > language happen to be in the right place (browser) at the right time (boom > of modern web)). > > Hmm... and this post ended up being much chaotic and longer than I > intended to... but whatever. > > Peter > > p.s.: I like the music analogy since I was listening to k-pop while > working (webtech), and now I am listening to ambient music when writing > about Pharo :p > >

July 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Semantics of #resignalAs:

by Joachim Tuchel

Norbert, Sorry if this is a stupid question: what does the debugger say? I mean, assuming NotFound is an Exception, I'd expect a debugger showing a NotFound Error... Joachim Am 23.07.2015 18:34 schrieb Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>: > > > > Am 23.07.2015 um 17:54 schrieb Joachim Tuchel <jtuchel(a)objektfabrik.de>: > > > > Norbert, > > > > I'd say you get a NotFound Exception. > > > In pharo you get a debugger. Meaning this piece of code is actively an endless loop. > > Norbert > > > Joachim > > > > > > > >> Am 23.07.2015 um 16:20 schrieb Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>: > >> > >> What are the semantics of Exception>>#resignalAs: regarding active exception handler? Isn't the active exception handler excluded from being treated again? Taking the example > >> > >> | counter | > >> counter := 0. > >> [ 1/0 ] > >>Â Â on: Error > >>Â Â do: [ :e | > >>Â Â Â Â Â Â counter := counter + 1. > >>Â Â Â Â Â Â counter > 1 ifTrue: [ self halt ]. > >>Â Â Â Â Â Â e resignalAs: NotFound new ]. > >> > >> should it just run and end? Or should the debugger pop up? > >> > >> thanks, > >> > >> Norbert > >> > >> > >> > > > > >

July 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Smalltalkhub permission denied

by Hilaire

I am still on PermissionDenied, strange. Le 22/07/2015 20:55, stepharo a Ã©crit : > Yes from time to time we have this problem... > > > Le 22/7/15 04:10, Hilaire a Ã©crit : >> Hello, >> >> On a freshly created project I have permission denied to write on the >> repo. >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~HilaireFernandes/Tools >> >> Hilaire >> > > > -- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu http://google.com/+DrgeoEu

July 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Semantics of #resignalAs:

by Norbert Hartl

> Am 23.07.2015 um 17:54 schrieb Joachim Tuchel <jtuchel(a)objektfabrik.de>: > > Norbert, > > I'd say you get a NotFound Exception. > In pharo you get a debugger. Meaning this piece of code is actively an endless loop. Norbert > Joachim > > > >> Am 23.07.2015 um 16:20 schrieb Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>: >> >> What are the semantics of Exception>>#resignalAs: regarding active exception handler? Isn't the active exception handler excluded from being treated again? Taking the example >> >> | counter | >> counter := 0. >> [ 1/0 ] >> on: Error >> do: [ :e | >> counter := counter + 1. >> counter > 1 ifTrue: [ self halt ]. >> e resignalAs: NotFound new ]. >> >> should it just run and end? Or should the debugger pop up? >> >> thanks, >> >> Norbert >> >> >> >

July 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] [OT] Bill Gross: The single biggest reason why startups succeed

by Peter UhnÃ¡k

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com> wrote: > When I talk to "new programmers" (20-25 years old), almost all of them > don't get attracted by it. > Why? I couldn't tell. Mainly because they can't use the few tools/patterns > they already learnt how to, barely, use. > As someone who (still) falls into this range I see several (unrelated) reasons why they might not like it. For me personally I encountered Pharo in University in "Conceptual modeling" class, where it was introduced pretty much as "Oh, by the way, here is this completely new environment that you've never seen nor worked with that we will use, but we will not tell you much about it"... so my first experience was quite awful. I mean... I couldn't even write the code in my favorite text editor and I had to use this weird browser where system code and my own code were mangled up. Image crashing meant I lost my work. Now I know I can just replay changes but I didn't know it back then (the focus of the class was modeling, not Pharo). Bugs (this was Pharo 2 (and 3 beta)) were commonplace and since I had no experience I couldn't tell whether it was my fault or the system's fault... it was overall very unpleasant. I later (after the course) basically foced myself to look at Pharo again because I didn't understand why would people bother to use it... so clearly there must have been some value I've missed. And I don't regret that decision a bit, but I had to go look for it. So statistically speaking from the year I did the class only two or three students (to my knowledge) kept their interest out of 119 (so 2-3% maybe). Other years were no different. Next year there will be a dedicated class for Pharo so I'm curious if this will change somehow. But there may be other reasons why students may not like it... (looking again from my experience) >From university experience perspective, the previous year (for us, and from what I talked with people it's not that different also for other universities) was a heavy massage in C and C++ where we were implementing very basic concepts (hashtables, and other data structures). A year where your main concern was to pass a automated checking system... so mostly memory management and creating write-only code. Plus warped concepts of OOP (so to use actual student quotes: "C++ is great for explaining OOP", "You can do OOP in pure C", or "OOP is useless, long confusing code, full of getters and setters, .. and slow. Inline assembler is much faster"). So with such concepts it's hard to give them OOP language, because they already made up their mind. Yet another reason I can see might be that when you are young you are more inclined to follow what's cool and modern and popular and shit (or has the word "game" in its name). So if today's world revolves around connectivity, internet, JavaScript and whatnot, then giving them a isolated environment with non-mainstream technology and a dead language they've never heard of (I thought that Smalltalk was an obscure language that died in '80s, before I found that actually it's alive and doing quite well) will not be met well with appreciation. But no reason to stop there... there market for Smalltalk is arguably small, so people will prefer language that is in demand by the market (after all, I pay my bills with JavaScript/PHP/webstuff, and not Pharo; because it's much easier to find a job; with Pharo I would have to basically start my own business to be profitable and then I would be doing business and not programming). And last (but not least), finding support for it is much harder, since the community is smaller. So it's almost all or nothing scenario. Also some of the arguments here can be applied also for functional programming (which I haven't (shame on me) even engaged with, besides messing with Haskell in XMonad (and multi-paradigm languages that have some functional concepts). Finally I don't think that you should expect the same behavior from young people (<26) as from adults. They will have different values, views, and whatnot... I mean that's the point of growing up and acquiring experience. All you can do is offer this alternative option and provide support. Being mainstream or non-mainstream is akin to self-fulfilling prophecy. (Of course exceptions happen, JavaScript was raised to glory because the language happen to be in the right place (browser) at the right time (boom of modern web)). Hmm... and this post ended up being much chaotic and longer than I intended to... but whatever. Peter p.s.: I like the music analogy since I was listening to k-pop while working (webtech), and now I am listening to ambient music when writing about Pharo :p

July 23, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Semantics of #resignalAs:

by Joachim Tuchel

Norbert, I'd say you get a NotFound Exception. Joachim > Am 23.07.2015 um 16:20 schrieb Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>: > > What are the semantics of Exception>>#resignalAs: regarding active exception handler? Isn't the active exception handler excluded from being treated again? Taking the example > > | counter | > counter := 0. > [ 1/0 ] > on: Error > do: [ :e | > counter := counter + 1. > counter > 1 ifTrue: [ self halt ]. > e resignalAs: NotFound new ]. > > should it just run and end? Or should the debugger pop up? > > thanks, > > Norbert > > >

July 23, 2015