March 2015 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] about Groups in Nautilus

by Thierry Goubier

Hi Stef, with Nicolai, we considered it would be nice to have everything (groups and scoping) based on RBEnvironments... And that we needed a way, for interactive use, to have 'live' or 'auto-updating' RBEnvironments (but maybe an environment used during a mass refactoring shouldn't be live however, to avoid recursion effects). Groups as kind of meta-packages... Interesting, as long as it doesn't uses the dependency mechanism of MC. Can we consider having also Ring objects to represent all this (group of packages, protocols)? Thierry Le 22/03/2015 11:00, stepharo a Ã©crit : > Hi > > I'm analysing the behavior of groups in nautilus. > > - Add group works well. > This is really cool to be able to promote a package in the top focus > list. > The problem is that the group is not polymorph to a package so we > cannot publish.... but for now this should be ok. > > -2 Now > Add as Groups & Browse > does not work for me since it open a browser that only contains the > groups but the refresh ... does not work. > Then this is strange because after we can still find a class that > is not in the original package. > > - 3 Now > Add Matching ... could work if ask for a pattern and stop to browse > (cf above). > > - 4 Add in group does not propose the currently available groups (only > Work) > > - merge groups > -> raises a DNU > > > So I will remove 2 and implement 3 > > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15202 > > Stef > > >

March 22, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] MySQL Access

by olivier auverlot

Hi Volkert, If you have no need of portability, you can try the ODBC connector ( http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~PharoExtras/ODBC) Best regards Olivier ;-) 2015-03-22 11:37 GMT+01:00 volkert <volkert(a)komponentenwerkstatt.de>: > Dear all, > > i need access to a MySQL DB from Pharo. What are my options here? Is > dbxtalk the way to go? > > I would like to start with Pharo 4.0. > > OS is Windows 8.1. > > BW, > Volkert > > > >

March 22, 2015

MySQL Access

by volkert

Dear all, i need access to a MySQL DB from Pharo. What are my options here? Is dbxtalk the way to go? I would like to start with Pharo 4.0. OS is Windows 8.1. BW, Volkert

March 22, 2015

about Groups in Nautilus

by stepharo

Hi I'm analysing the behavior of groups in nautilus. - Add group works well. This is really cool to be able to promote a package in the top focus list. The problem is that the group is not polymorph to a package so we cannot publish.... but for now this should be ok. -2 Now Add as Groups & Browse does not work for me since it open a browser that only contains the groups but the refresh ... does not work. Then this is strange because after we can still find a class that is not in the original package. - 3 Now Add Matching ... could work if ask for a pattern and stop to browse (cf above). - 4 Add in group does not propose the currently available groups (only Work) - merge groups -> raises a DNU So I will remove 2 and implement 3 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15202 Stef

March 22, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Cleaning/Simplifying Nautilus

by Marcus Denker

> On 22 Mar 2015, at 08:27, stepharo <stepharo(a)free.fr> wrote: > > As soon as Pharo 5.0 is out it will get in :) > Again we will do videos and I do not want to have to work at that time on it. > Yes, but of course Pharo will change in the futureâ¦ the idea that it will stay as it is now should not be the goal... > We will have to fix all the shortcuts also because we still have > Cmd + m and Cmd b+m > Yes, for Pharo5 we need to tackle the shortcut - unification. Marcus

March 22, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Cleaning/Simplifying Nautilus

by stepharo

As soon as Pharo 5.0 is out it will get in :) Again we will do videos and I do not want to have to work at that time on it. We will have to fix all the shortcuts also because we still have Cmd + m and Cmd b+m ;)

March 22, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Cleaning/Simplifying Nautilus

by Marcus Denker

> On 22 Mar 2015, at 00:31, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > > But seriously, for 4.0 ? > Now ? > No, for Pharo5 of course. If you check the issue, it has explicit the Milestone âLaterâ. For Pharo4, we need to be careful: there are still 57 open issues, and it will be a challenge to fix them in one weekâ¦ Marcus

March 22, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo-Launcher Windows 8.1

by Jan B.

I confirm that this problem is even on Windows 7. I does not start without PharoV30.sources. Any option in settings is not solution in this case, because to get into settings, you have to open it first, which is not possible. Another thing is that in my opinion pharo launcher is not "advertised" enough. I mean it is so great tool it should be directly downloadable from http://pharo.org/ ... right now, I had a problem to find a download link for windows even with google. Jan kilon.alios wrote > there is also an options in settings that downloads and install sources > for > you automagically. > > This is the right place to report issues and if you are 100% sure its a > bug > you can report it also in the pharo fogbuz > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Sebastian Heidbrink < > sheidev@ > > > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I recently mentioned issues with the installation of the pharo-launcher >> on >> Windows 8.1 >> >> Turned out I just needed to download the PharoV30.sources file and place >> into the installation folder. >> >> Now everything seems fine. >> >> Is this also a topic for the pharo bug list, or is there another place >> where I can mention this? >> >> Sebastian >> >> -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Launcher-Windows-8-1-tp4813640p4813978.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 22, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo-Launcher Windows 8.1

by Alain Rastoul

Le 22/03/2015 03:36, Ben Coman a Ã©crit : > It would be nice, but btw will not address that situation. Parties > interested in the issue woudl still need to copy mail list discussion > there, or link to the mail archive of the discussion. Fogbugz should > hold case history. > cheers -ben > You are right if you see the discussion in the list. I recently added a note to a case without seeing it was discussed in the list and think it was not the good place. A separate list for bugs (threads in the list do not allways clearly link to the bugs and they are lot of various threads) may have helped. With a tag in the title in case of opened bugs. I agree that fogbugz should hold the history. -- Regards, Alain

March 22, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo-Launcher Windows 8.1

by Ben Coman

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Alain Rastoul <alf.mmm.cat(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Le 21/03/2015 14:08, stepharo a Ã©crit : > >> Nice idea! >> >>> I think that we should have a Pharo-bugs mailing list that gets >>> notified for each bug that is filled in fogbugz >>> >> > Yes that would be nice, when you look at bugs on fogbugz site, you do not > always see that it is discussed in the list (lot of threads) > > It would be nice, but btw will not address that situation. Parties interested in the issue woudl still need to copy mail list discussion there, or link to the mail archive of the discussion. Fogbugz should hold case history. cheers -ben

March 22, 2015