January 2015 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] NBSQLite3 on OS X - Pharo 3j

by David T. Lewis

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 09:54:12AM +0100, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > > On 25 Jan 2015, at 07:13, Pierce Ng <pierce(a)samadhiweb.com> wrote: > > > > On OSX, "OSProcessAccessor forThisOSProcess primGetCurrentWorkingDirectory" > > gives "/", while on Linux the same gives "/home/pierce/work/pharo30". (Above > > requires the OSProcess package which is available from the Config Browser.) That sounds right. It calls getcwd() from the VM process. primGetCurrentWorkingDirectory "Call getcwd() to get the current working directory." The current working directory of the VM process will ("man 3 getcwd" for an exact description) will vary depending on how you launch the VM. Dave > > Why not just use > > FileSystem disk workingDirectory > > ?

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by Esteban Lorenzano

But next year we will have an Athens based UI, so the performance will improve dramatically :) Real problem is to invest time (and talent) to improve current design... It costs much more than you could believe. Esteban > On 25/1/2015, at 15:42, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 03:35:40PM +0100, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: >>> >>> http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html >> >> >> It is almost impossible to do it like this in Pharo now because of low >> drawing performance and bad support of animations. Sad but true. > > thanks for the note. > > per you, how long would this low drawing performance and bad support for > animations issue hold true? > > ~mayuresh > >

Jan. 25, 2015

Binary tree

by Natalia Tymchuk

Hello, Is there any implementation of the binary tree in Pharo? Best reagards, Natalia

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by Mayuresh Kathe

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 03:35:40PM +0100, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > > > http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html > > > It is almost impossible to do it like this in Pharo now because of low > drawing performance and bad support of animations. Sad but true. thanks for the note. per you, how long would this low drawing performance and bad support for animations issue hold true? ~mayuresh

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] UI framework&design options

by Peter Uhnak

Hi, what is in Deep into Pharo is describing Roassal1, but now we have Roassal2. Also the book is still work in progress... I believe Alex mentioned releasing it in mid 2015. Right now also the pharo and moose mailing list is good source of information, since roassal was discussed a lot in the past few months. Peter -----Original Message----- From: "Piotr Klibert" <piotr.klibert(a)10clouds.com> Sent: â1/â25/â2015 1:26 PM To: "Any question about pharo is welcome" <pharo-users(a)lists.pharo.org> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] UI framework&design options > > is there a high-level overview of Roassal > architecture somewhere? > I just found http://agilevisualization.com/#book - last time I read about Roassal was in a draft for Deep into Pharo a couple of years ago and I'm glad to see that documentation situation improved so much. Added to my reading list. Best regards, Piotr Klibert

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by Aliaksei Syrel

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html It is almost impossible to do it like this in Pharo now because of low drawing performance and bad support of animations. Sad but true. Cheers, Alex

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] UI framework&design options

by Stephan Eggermont

That Maya Node Editor looks like a PasteUpMorph with Connectors to me. You'd might want to wrap them (Morphic) in a in a standard window with menu bar and toolbar from either Spec or Glamour for now. And then follow Bloc developments to move there. Stephan

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by Mayuresh Kathe

On 2015-01-25 19:30, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > while i admire what the pharo team has done with it's user interface, > i believe it can be improved. > has google's "material design" been considered off-late? > do take a look at; http://www.google.com/design/ actually, a more precise 'url' would be as below; http://www.google.com/design/spec/material-design/introduction.html

Jan. 25, 2015

pharo _looks_ good, but can be improved ...

by Mayuresh Kathe

while i admire what the pharo team has done with it's user interface, i believe it can be improved. has google's "material design" been considered off-late? do take a look at; http://www.google.com/design/ ~mayuresh

Jan. 25, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] when was pharo announced to the world?

by Mayuresh Kathe

hi sven, yes, i did look at it from a birthday perspective. and yes, it would be nice if stephane or marcus do suggest a date. :) ~mayuresh On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 01:30:37PM +0100, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > Hi Mayuresh, > > You mean like a birthday ? Good idea ! > > I'll leave it to St??phane or Marcus to propose a date, Wikipedia says Pharo 1.0 was released on April 15th. But Pharo was of course already active for quite some time before that. > > Sven > > > On 25 Jan 2015, at 12:36, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh(a)kathe.in> wrote: > > > > hi, a trivial question; when was pharo announced to the world? > > > > we all could use that day as the one to collectively chip in some amount > > towards the project's operational expenses. > > > > a nice burst of funds, once a year might be a good thing compared to a > > funding drive (as some of the other open source projects carry out). > > > > ~mayuresh > > > > > >

Jan. 25, 2015