January 2015 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Hijacking a Configuration for loading a Github Baseline

by kilon alios

So I have a Configuration in the Meta repo of pharo 4 and 3 that loads the latest version of my project Ephestos. However I have moved my development to github since I am very happy with the workflow and since I discovered loading github repos via a baseline I have little use for smalltalkhub. So my plan is this, keep the configuration in the meta repo so people and me can install my project easily with one click via the wonderful simple configuration browser , but I dont want anymore to load any versions with it. Instead I want to tell the configuration "load the github baseline" which means it will fetch the code from my github account master branch which is the stable branch anyway (and the only branch so far) . That will allow me to never have to update that configuration again since it will just load the latest code from github repo. The question is how to do this the easiest and cleanest way possible ?

Jan. 27, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] moose poster

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Nice, thank you. > On 27 Jan 2015, at 08:32, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I put together an A4 Moose poster: > http://moosetechnology.org/res/artwork/moose-poster.pdf > > Cheers, > Doru > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow"

Jan. 27, 2015

moose poster

by Tudor Girba

Hi, I put together an A4 Moose poster: http://moosetechnology.org/res/artwork/moose-poster.pdf Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Jan. 27, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo Sound of Silence

by Sean P. DeNigris

Evan Donahue wrote > I'm trying to get sounds working in Pharo If it helps, I started a minimal wrapper of the cross-platform FMOD library at http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~SeanDeNigris/FMOD . I did enough to play mp3s. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Sound-of-Silence-tp4801562p4801848.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jan. 27, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] NumericalMethods and SciSmalltalk

by Werner Kassens

let me rephrase it <g> just that there are no misunderstandings, NumericalMethods is independent of SciSmalltalk and does work in Pharo4 werner On 01/26/2015 10:22 PM, Ignacio Sniechowski wrote: > That was my question. If in Pharo 4 the NumericalMethods package will be > deprecated and instead SciSmalltalk will be de defacto package for stats.

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] Help with video recordings at Fosdem needed

by Udo Schneider

Hi Stephan, On 26/01/15 21:17, Stephan Eggermont wrote: > The gear is organized by Fosdem. Camera on tripod, > Microphone for speaker and audience questions, > Simultaneous recording of screen. Over 20 simultaneous > livestreams. So there will be a user manual and a help > desk. Perfect! Count me in. I'm not sure whether I can stay until the last session on Sunday. Have to check my flights. Is there anything I can read upfront? Is it just one cam or multiple cams with vision mixer? CU, Udo

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] NumericalMethods and SciSmalltalk

by HernÃ¡n Morales Durand

2015-01-26 18:22 GMT-03:00 Ignacio Sniechowski <0800nacho(a)gmail.com>: > That was my question. If in Pharo 4 the NumericalMethods package will be > deprecated and instead SciSmalltalk will be de defacto package for stats. > NumericalMethods should be kept separated from SciSmalltalk so we are free to use NumericalMethods without requiring to load the whole SciSmalltalk. Cheers, HernÃ¡n

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] NumericalMethods and SciSmalltalk

by Ignacio Sniechowski

That was my question. If in Pharo 4 the NumericalMethods package will be deprecated and instead SciSmalltalk will be de defacto package for stats. thanks *Lic. Ignacio Sniechowski, MBA* *Prosavic SRL* *Tel: (011) 4542-6714* On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Werner Kassens <wkassens(a)libello.com> wrote: > but numericalmethods and scismalltalk are not usable together they > overwrite each other and that produces nonsense > werner > > On 01/26/2015 07:50 PM, Werner Kassens wrote: > >> in scismalltalk a fork of numericalmethods is used. >> DhbNormalDistribution in scismalltalk should be exactly the same as in >> numericalmethods and should be usable without code change. >> werner >> > >

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] How much users ?

by Pierre CHANSON

> Or not more that in Pharo-users. I mean it would be strange that Nabble had all the Pharo user-only and [Pharo-users] does not have any.

Jan. 26, 2015

Re: [Pharo-users] How much users ?

by Pierre CHANSON

> > People read the mailing list via other means, too > (Nabble, for example). Or maybe there are user-only on Nabble. But I guess not so much ? Or not more that in Pharo-users. Pierre 2015-01-26 17:59 GMT-03:00 Pierre CHANSON <chans.pierre(a)gmail.com>: > thanks! > Around 500, it's still impressive. > > I guess I can count a little bit less to have a number on Pharo devs, > Pharo active community. > > But it is difficult to put a real number on pharo users: > If we consider that all Pharo devs (or almost) are in the both lists, (And > I guess this is not so false because my feeling is that Pharo devs tend to > help new Pharo users) it means there is no Pharo user-only, or there is no > Pharo user-only in the mailing list... > And at first I would have thought that begin to use Pharo, comes with > applying to the mailing list (because there is not a lot of tutorials and > documentations for any kind of Pharo applications all arround the net). > > 2015-01-26 11:43 GMT-03:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>: > > >> > On 26 Jan 2015, at 15:39, kilon alios <kilon.alios(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > probably the biggest reason is that the list has been quite inactive >> till now. Another is that many of pharo users find it easy to contribute >> back to pharo because of the nature of the enviroment and the third , the >> community is just to small to have a sizable pharo-user list. Personally I >> am surprised that Pharo-dev has not much more. >> > >> People read the mailing list via other means, too >> (Nabble, for example). >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >

Jan. 26, 2015