March 2014 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] 64 bit version

by Roelof Wobben

kilon alios schreef op 29-3-2014 16:07: > what "pure" means ? as far I know a lib can be either 64 or 32 bit , > but not both. Yes you will need the 32 bit version to work it with > pharo, of course you still going to need a FFI like nativeboost or to > write a VM plugin to get it to work from inside Pharo. > With Pure I mean I do not have a multilib system so I have the 32 and the 64 bit libraries. I will download the 32 bit version and install it so I can install Pharo on my linux system. Roelof

March 29, 2014

example does not work

by Roelof Wobben

Hello, I have downloaded version2 on Windows 7. Now Im following chapter 1 and have to type BouncingAtomsMorph new openInWorld and then choose do it. But instead of seeing bouncing balls I see a message that BouncingAtomsMorph unknown variable. How to make it work ? Roelof

March 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] 64 bit version

by kilon alios

what "pure" means ? as far I know a lib can be either 64 or 32 bit , but not both. Yes you will need the 32 bit version to work it with pharo, of course you still going to need a FFI like nativeboost or to write a VM plugin to get it to work from inside Pharo. On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Roelof Wobben <r.wobben(a)home.nl> wrote: > Pity. Im using Frugalware which has pure 32 or pure 64 bit. > Then I need to download the 32 bit and install that one and ty to make > Pharos work. > > Roelof > > > kilon alios schreef op 29-3-2014 15:16: > > no unfortunately there is no such thing. Fortunately most open source > libraries out there still compile for 32 bit so you should not experience > any major issues. > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Roelof Wobben <r.wobben(a)home.nl> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Is there a 64 bit version of Pharo. >> I use a 64 bit version without the 32 bit libraries so no multilib >> >> Roelof >> >> >> > >

March 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] 64 bit version

by Pharo4Stef

no yet. Planned for the end of the year. Stef > Hello, > > Is there a 64 bit version of Pharo. > I use a 64 bit version without the 32 bit libraries so no multilib > > Roelof > >

March 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] 64 bit version

by Roelof Wobben

March 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] 64 bit version

by kilon alios

no unfortunately there is no such thing. Fortunately most open source libraries out there still compile for 32 bit so you should not experience any major issues. On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Roelof Wobben <r.wobben(a)home.nl> wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a 64 bit version of Pharo. > I use a 64 bit version without the 32 bit libraries so no multilib > > Roelof > > >

March 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Application Security for your domains

by Robert Shiplett

do we have a Pharo PassPhrase 4 X 4 - specific project/variant/branch ? (i.e., four 4-char substring => 1 Passphrase ) I had done some work on mnemonics for such passphrases ... and I realize some like to salt-and-pepper with 3-char and 5-char Unicode chunks ... thnkx On 29 March 2014 10:05, Pierce Ng <pierce(a)samadhiweb.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:58:48PM -0300, Hern??n Morales Durand wrote: > > Second, my first entry contains a post about Application Security, a new > > package to make Pharo applications more secure. You can start playing > with > > the objects right now, while more documentation is being written for the > > next release. > > Hi, > > Good stuff! > > I've been doing some password-related work as well. > > http://samadhiweb.com/blog/2013.08.11.splitpasswordstore.html > > This allows writing the following: > > spec := DBConnectionSpec new > key: 'mysql'; > host: 'localhost'; port: 3306; > user: 'myappuser'; > ====> password: (SpsSplitPasswordStore readFrom: 'myappuser.dat'); > yourself. > > Also, SHA256/512 password hashing: > > http://samadhiweb.com/blog/2013.11.17.shacrypt.html > > Code for both is published on SS3. > > -- > Pierce Ng > http://samadhiweb.com/blog/ > > >

March 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] Application Security for your domains

by Pierce Ng

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:58:48PM -0300, Hern??n Morales Durand wrote: > Second, my first entry contains a post about Application Security, a new > package to make Pharo applications more secure. You can start playing with > the objects right now, while more documentation is being written for the > next release. Hi, Good stuff! I've been doing some password-related work as well. http://samadhiweb.com/blog/2013.08.11.splitpasswordstore.html This allows writing the following: spec := DBConnectionSpec new key: 'mysql'; host: 'localhost'; port: 3306; user: 'myappuser'; ====> password: (SpsSplitPasswordStore readFrom: 'myappuser.dat'); yourself. Also, SHA256/512 password hashing: http://samadhiweb.com/blog/2013.11.17.shacrypt.html Code for both is published on SS3. -- Pierce Ng http://samadhiweb.com/blog/

March 29, 2014

64 bit version

by Roelof Wobben

Hello, Is there a 64 bit version of Pharo. I use a 64 bit version without the 32 bit libraries so no multilib Roelof

March 29, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] JNIPort for Pharo 3.0 alpha

by Joachim Geidel

Hi Doru, Am 27.03.2014 um 13:07 schrieb Tudor Girba: > Just a question: is there a way to communicate with an already running VM that was started independently from Pharo? JNIPort uses the Java VM as a DLL / shared library, using the Java Invocation Interface which is part of the Java Native Interface. Actually, the Java VM *is* a shared library, and the java.exe is just a wrapper for starting it. When using JNIPort, the Pharo VM and the Java VM run in the same operating system process, and communicating with the Java VM just means calling functions from a library. Communicating with an already running Java VM is a totally different use case, as the Pharo VM and the Java VM run in two different operating system processes. To establish a communication between them, you would have to use an inter-process communication mechanism available in both of them. Pipes, TCP sockets, a messaging system, or running one of them as a server and the other as a client using a common protocol. Thatâs not what JNIPort is made for, and what you need for implementing it depends on the communication mechanism. HTH, Joachim

March 29, 2014