March 2014 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

RRDTool - Graphs

by phil＠highoctane.be

I wanted to know if someone has a package to deal with RRD tool files and graphs directly from Pharo. RRDTool is: http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/ I'd like to to use these things in a Seaside application. TIA Phil

March 14, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Metacello changes in Pharo 3?

by Christophe Demarey

Hi, I don't think there is a doc explaining differences between Metacello and Metacello 2 (also known as Metacello Preview) that is now used in Pharo 3.0. But here is the doc for Metacello 2: https://github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work/blob/master/docs/MetacelloUse… You can also use Versionner to edit configurations in Pharo 3 (in the tools menu). Versionner doc: http://chercheurs.lille.inria.fr/~demarey/Tech/Versionner Regards, Christophe. Le 13 mars 2014 Ã 16:47, MartinW a Ã©crit : > Hi, > it seems Metacallo changed in Pharo 3 compared to Pharo 2. > First thing i noticed was that a Configuration does no longer seem to be > supposed to subclass from Object but from ConfigurationOf? > Are there other changes? Where can i learn about them? Is there an official > documentation that describes the Metacello Version in Pharo 3? > > Best regards, Martin. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-changes-in-Pharo-3-tp4749011.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

March 13, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Metacello changes in Pharo 3?

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 13 Mar 2014, at 16:47, MartinW <wm(a)fastmail.fm> wrote: > First thing i noticed was that a Configuration does no longer seem to be > supposed to subclass from Object but from ConfigurationOf? AFAIK that is not a requirement, maybe just a suggestion/option, but configurations subclassed from Object definitively still work in Pharo 3.x

March 13, 2014

Metacello changes in Pharo 3?

by MartinW

Hi, it seems Metacallo changed in Pharo 3 compared to Pharo 2. First thing i noticed was that a Configuration does no longer seem to be supposed to subclass from Object but from ConfigurationOf? Are there other changes? Where can i learn about them? Is there an official documentation that describes the Metacello Version in Pharo 3? Best regards, Martin. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Metacello-changes-in-Pharo-3-tp4749011.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 13, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

by Attila Magyar

Thanks for the nice words to everyone. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ANN-BabyMock-2-tp4748530p4748878.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] Tiling Window Manager in 3.0: working but still issues with WorldMorph

by Laurent Laffont

Hi Phil, with latest ConfigurationOfTilingWindow manager World management (almost) works. Still a little display issue when creating a new world (need to change back and forth, seems to be some World repaint issue). I've also merged some experiments with GrowlMorph. Laurent Le mardi 11 mars 2014, 13:27:57 Laurent Laffont a Ã©crit : > Thanks a lot Phil. I will try to have a look. > > Laurent > > > Le samedi 8 mars 2014, 11:57:30 phil(a)highoctane.be a Ã©crit : > > TWM works in 3.0 after some work on icons and updating menus. > > > > Gofer new > > smalltalkhubUser: 'LaurentLaffont' project: 'TilingWindowManager'; > > configuration; > > load. > > > > ((Smalltalk at:#ConfigurationOfTilingWindowManager) project version: '3.0') > > load > > > > You can also use > > > > ((Smalltalk at:#ConfigurationOfTilingWindowManager) project version: > > #development) load > > > > but this will for sure change over time. > > > > There is the World management icon which is still there and it looks like > > it can create worlds but switching between them just breaks havoc. > > > > Maybe should we just remove that feature from TWM as 3.0 doesn't seem to be > > multiworld friendly. > > > > Nothing done on tests nor themeing (which appears to be not that working > > well in 3.0 either due to theming changes); > > > > At least the thing is back :-) [I missed it...] > > > > Phil > >

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

by Richard Wettel

Very cool stuff, indeed! Ricky On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: > Beautiful work! > > Doru > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Attila Magyar <m.magyar3(a)gmail.com>wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce the 2.0 version of BabyMock. BabyMock is a visual >> mock object library that supports test-driven development. >> >> This version has a new syntax which is incompatible with the old version. >> Therefore it has a new repository >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~zeroflag/BabyMock2 >> (BabyMock 1 is still available at its old location, but in the future I'd >> to >> focus on the development of BabyMock2, so don't expect too many changes >> regarding the old version). >> >> Changes in 2.0 >> >> - A new, extensible DSL (no more should/can) >> - Improved error messages, history of messages, detailed information about >> argument mismatches >> - An improved, Spec based GUI >> - Clicking on a mock opens an inspector on the expectations >> - Clicking on a message opens an inspector on the message >> - Object methods can be mocked by defaults >> - Blocks can be executed after receiving a message by the mock. The block >> has access to the arguments of the incoming message. >> - Any argument matcher >> - Cleanups and simplifications in the code >> >> I hope you don't mind the changes regarding the syntax. Personally I think >> it has lot more pros than cons. >> >> More information >> >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~zeroflag/BabyMock2 >> >> p.s. >> It needs Pharo3.0. >> >> Attila >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/ANN-BabyMock-2-tp4748530.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow" >

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BabyMock 2

by Tudor Girba

Beautiful work! Doru On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Attila Magyar <m.magyar3(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I'm pleased to announce the 2.0 version of BabyMock. BabyMock is a visual > mock object library that supports test-driven development. > > This version has a new syntax which is incompatible with the old version. > Therefore it has a new repository > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~zeroflag/BabyMock2 > (BabyMock 1 is still available at its old location, but in the future I'd > to > focus on the development of BabyMock2, so don't expect too many changes > regarding the old version). > > Changes in 2.0 > > - A new, extensible DSL (no more should/can) > - Improved error messages, history of messages, detailed information about > argument mismatches > - An improved, Spec based GUI > - Clicking on a mock opens an inspector on the expectations > - Clicking on a message opens an inspector on the message > - Object methods can be mocked by defaults > - Blocks can be executed after receiving a message by the mock. The block > has access to the arguments of the incoming message. > - Any argument matcher > - Cleanups and simplifications in the code > > I hope you don't mind the changes regarding the syntax. Personally I think > it has lot more pros than cons. > > More information > > http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~zeroflag/BabyMock2 > > p.s. > It needs Pharo3.0. > > Attila > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/ANN-BabyMock-2-tp4748530.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Am not sure if that is a good idea

by Tudor Girba

It's related enough :) Doru On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo(a)gmail.com>wrote: > Not exactly the same, but related... one of the features I REALLY miss > from the Dolphin Smalltalk debugger is the listing of the stack > variables in the debugger. This way, I could see, manipulate and > inspect intermediate objects, assigned to temporal variables like > _stack1, _stack2, etc. [1] > > That really speeds up my daily debugging. > > > Esteban A. Maringolo > > > [1] http://imgur.com/DhyJ1xU > > 2014-03-12 5:02 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>: > > Hi, > > > > Yes, these are all points for research. It is these things that can make > > Pharo define its own ground and change dramatically the meaning of > > programming. There is so much we can do in this space. > > > > If anyone wants to start playing let me know so that we can coordinate. > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Friedrich Dominicus > > <frido(a)q-software-solutions.de> wrote: > >> > >> anyway. Has anyone considered adding filtering to the Debugger (in my > >> case the Glamorous Debugger) in a way that not all instance variables > >> values are shown in the value pane? > >> > >> Well a kind of watch as in other debuggers. You just can "ask" to watch > >> e.g field firstName but not lastName or something like that. Even if I > >> try to keep the information down some classes still do have a lot of > >> elements (think of articles, which usually have at least some kind of > >> id, a description, a price tag, but also some other information (be it > >> internal or extenal for the programm) > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > "Every thing has its own flow" > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

March 12, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Am not sure if that is a good idea

by Esteban A. Maringolo

Not exactly the same, but related... one of the features I REALLY miss from the Dolphin Smalltalk debugger is the listing of the stack variables in the debugger. This way, I could see, manipulate and inspect intermediate objects, assigned to temporal variables like _stack1, _stack2, etc. [1] That really speeds up my daily debugging. Esteban A. Maringolo [1] http://imgur.com/DhyJ1xU 2014-03-12 5:02 GMT-03:00 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>: > Hi, > > Yes, these are all points for research. It is these things that can make > Pharo define its own ground and change dramatically the meaning of > programming. There is so much we can do in this space. > > If anyone wants to start playing let me know so that we can coordinate. > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Friedrich Dominicus > <frido(a)q-software-solutions.de> wrote: >> >> anyway. Has anyone considered adding filtering to the Debugger (in my >> case the Glamorous Debugger) in a way that not all instance variables >> values are shown in the value pane? >> >> Well a kind of watch as in other debuggers. You just can "ask" to watch >> e.g field firstName but not lastName or something like that. Even if I >> try to keep the information down some classes still do have a lot of >> elements (think of articles, which usually have at least some kind of >> id, a description, a price tag, but also some other information (be it >> internal or extenal for the programm) >> >> >> > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow"

March 12, 2014