February 2014 - Pharo-users

Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

by Esteban Lorenzano

and even if it would be unstableâ¦ issues needs to be always reported, is the only way to be aware :) On 26 Feb 2014, at 07:45, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Nautilus is not unstable. > That should not be happening and in fact I cannot reproduce it. > Please report. > > On 26 Feb 2014, at 01:57, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am running from that latest.zip tonight and PackageTreeNautilusUI >>update is getting a walkback messageNoUnderstood for >> receiver of >>protocolsFor: is nil >> >> I simply flipped to class view in Announcements and then flipped that toggle back. >> >> Does this need to be reported, or is Nautilus still known to be unstable ? >> >> thanks >> >> I'll go back to my older 3.0 candidate for now ... >> >> R >> >> >> On 25 February 2014 19:02, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> none >> >> just download this one: >> >> http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip >> >> is always the latest effective build. >> >> Esteban >> >> On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:05, FranÃ§ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > I'd like to download the latest Pharo 3 on the CI server but I don't know which one I should download? >> > >> > The last one on the list? >> > <Screen Shot 2014-02-25 at 21.03.07.png> >> >> >> >

Feb. 26, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

by Esteban Lorenzano

Nautilus is not unstable. That should not be happening and in fact I cannot reproduce it. Please report. On 26 Feb 2014, at 01:57, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I am running from that latest.zip tonight and PackageTreeNautilusUI >>update is getting a walkback messageNoUnderstood for > receiver of >>protocolsFor: is nil > > I simply flipped to class view in Announcements and then flipped that toggle back. > > Does this need to be reported, or is Nautilus still known to be unstable ? > > thanks > > I'll go back to my older 3.0 candidate for now ... > > R > > > On 25 February 2014 19:02, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > none > > just download this one: > > http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip > > is always the latest effective build. > > Esteban > > On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:05, FranÃ§ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'd like to download the latest Pharo 3 on the CI server but I don't know which one I should download? > > > > The last one on the list? > > <Screen Shot 2014-02-25 at 21.03.07.png> > > >

Feb. 26, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] New methods for the String class

by HernÃ¡n Morales Durand

Hi Daniela, 2014-02-24 14:30 GMT-03:00 Daniela Meneses <daniela11290(a)gmail.com>: > Hi to all, > > As you may know I'm working on in some improvements for the String class. > Until now I implemented some missing tests. Right now I'm looking forward > to add new methods that could be useful based on Ruby API ( > http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-2.1.0/String.html) These are a few of the > methods that I'm planning to implement: > > > - chomp(separator=$/) -> new_str > - chop() -> new_str > - ljust(integer, padstr='') ->new_str > - next -> new_str > - partition(sep) -> [head, sep, tail] > > > Could you help to find out if these methods are already available for the > String class? > > If you have any idea of new methods for the string class, will be really > welcome. > > We can have an information retrieval API for aproximate string matching, i.e. Levenshtein distance (already implemented, various versions), Hamming distance, both are the most used and simplest edit distances. Then you have Longest common subsequence, Longest common substring (they are implemented in a package called "Fuzz", #longestCommonSubsequenceWith: ). Also there is the shift-or adapted for approximate matches (also implemented), fuzzy phrasing is another world also. Many applications use Damerau edit distance. Bioinformatics uses the Needleman-Wunsch and Smith-Waterman, but they call them "aligners" :) but you don't want to code the optimized version in Smalltalk, some say it could take years. All edit distances out there have specific requirements and no one is better than another for all cases. For example Jaro-Winkler is useful for one-word short strings. You have a lot of options for research. Smalltalkers here are very experienced and clever, always gives cool advices so don't be afraid to ask. Cheers, HernÃ¡n > -- > Cheers > , > Daniela Meneses >

Feb. 26, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

by Robert Shiplett

that problematic latest.zip contains -30782 files R On 25 February 2014 19:02, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > none > > just download this one: > > http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip > > is always the latest effective build. > > Esteban > > On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:05, FranÃ§ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'd like to download the latest Pharo 3 on the CI server but I don't > know which one I should download? > > > > The last one on the list? > > <Screen Shot 2014-02-25 at 21.03.07.png> > > >

Feb. 26, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

by Robert Shiplett

I am running from that latest.zip tonight and PackageTreeNautilusUI >>update is getting a walkback messageNoUnderstood for receiver of >>protocolsFor: is nil I simply flipped to class view in Announcements and then flipped that toggle back. Does this need to be reported, or is Nautilus still known to be unstable ? thanks I'll go back to my older 3.0 candidate for now ... R On 25 February 2014 19:02, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > none > > just download this one: > > http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip > > is always the latest effective build. > > Esteban > > On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:05, FranÃ§ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'd like to download the latest Pharo 3 on the CI server but I don't > know which one I should download? > > > > The last one on the list? > > <Screen Shot 2014-02-25 at 21.03.07.png> > > >

Feb. 26, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Which one should I download?

by Esteban Lorenzano

none just download this one: http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip is always the latest effective build. Esteban On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:05, FranÃ§ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to download the latest Pharo 3 on the CI server but I don't know which one I should download? > > The last one on the list? > <Screen Shot 2014-02-25 at 21.03.07.png>

Feb. 25, 2014

Which one should I download?

by FranÃ§ois Stephany

I'd like to download the latest Pharo 3 on the CI server but I don't know which one I should download? The last one on the list?

Feb. 25, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] Moose: Problem in Petit Parser

by Damien Cassou

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 6:01 PM, PBK Research <peter(a)pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote: > but I shall take good care to read everything I can find before > raising queries. asking question is not a problem, please continue, even if you believe the answer is somewhere already. Don't hesitate to use stackoverflow (tag #pharo) for your questions instead of the mailing list. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." Winston Churchill

Feb. 25, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [Pharo Consortium] New Sponsor: Object Profile

by Tudor Girba

Great!! Doru On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>wrote: > The Pharo Consortium is very happy to announce that Object Profile is > supporting the Pharo Consortium > as a Sponsor. > > More about > - Object Profile: http://objectprofile.com > - Pharo Consortium: http://consortium.pharo.org > > > The goal of the Pharo Consortium is to allow companies to support the > ongoing development and future of Pharo. > > Individuals can support Pharo via the Pharo Association: > http://association.pharo.org > > ==== > > ( > This actually happened some weeks ago already... sorry for the late announce. > There is already another member listed (to be announced) and yet another > will be added soon. > > In addition, we are nearly finished with setting up the infrastructure for > the consortium members... so if > you are one of those and wonder: Soon (as in: this week). Sorry for the > delay! > ) > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"

Feb. 25, 2014

Re: [Pharo-users] The new versionner is cool

by Usman Bhatti

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 7:12 PM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand < hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2014-02-21 8:25 GMT-03:00 Usman Bhatti <usman.bhatti(a)gmail.com>: > > Hello, >> >> I found Versionner very productive tool. I was able to create a new >> configuration "from scratch" within a few minutes with the packages that I >> wanted to put into it. Though, I couldn't commit my new config through its >> interface because Komitter kept asking for a issue number but I didn't have >> it. >> >> > You want to commit a new configuration through Kommiter? > Kommiter wasn't my choice but this is what popups when you want to commit your config created with Versionner. > > >

Feb. 25, 2014