July 2013 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] installing Seaside on Pharo 2.0

by phil＠highoctane.be

http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~philippeback/HOSeaside --- Philippe Back Dramatic Performance Improvements Mob: +32(0) 478 650 140 | Fax: +32 (0) 70 408 027 Mail:phil@highoctane.be | Web: http://philippeback.eu Blog: http://philippeback.be | Twitter: @philippeback Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/philippeback/videos High Octane SPRL rue cour Boisacq 101 | 1301 Bierges | Belgium Featured on the Software Process and Measurement Cast http://spamcast.libsyn.com Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Ability Engineering EADocX Value Added Reseller On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:13 AM, sminni <sm(a)planage.com> wrote: > Thanks ... got the Zinc server to work > > but could not get to smalltalkhub.com > I just get a "Loading please wait" message that sits till I give up > What is the way to get the HOSeaside Package > > regards > Sanjay > > > > ----- > --- > Regards, Sanjay > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/installing-Seaside-on-Pharo-2-0-tp4698685p4699247.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >

July 18, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BioSmalltalk published in Bioinformatics Journal

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Yes every publisher say the same. Now you have the right to have a preprint on your web site. Stef On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:14 PM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand <hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > Thank you for the comments, I have been checking the link distribution conditions and they say people can access the article only from the Oxford Journals website for academic purposes, so here it is: > > http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/07/09/bioinform… > > Sorry for the inconvenience. > Cheers, > > HernÃ¡n > > > > 2013/7/17 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> > > On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:31 PM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand <hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Doru, I can access the article through the "Full Text (PDF)" link at the right box titled "This Article". Maybe you have the right columns collapsed? There is an arrow button "Show all columns" if you cannot see the link. > > Let me know. > > > > Publishing is the act of making Paper in-accessible to the Public (that's where the name comes from). > > So what all serious publishers allow you to do is to make the version that you send them (not their version) available from your > website and/or an online-archive of your employer, > > It is very important to do that, as people will not jump through hoops to get your paper (e.g. go to the library?). > In the past I send emails to authors to get paper copies, but today I would just *never* do that. If *you* don't make your > paper available, why should I bother? i will just not read it and not cite it. > > The journal publishing is just important for your CV and getting tenure and things like that, the paper the people > really *read* is the one they can download from your website. > > Marcus >

July 18, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] development image memory use: 180MB in Pharo 2 vs. 40MB in Pharo 1.4.....

by Marcus Denker

On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:59 PM, Paul DeBruicker <pdebruic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I've been developing in the same Pharo2 image for a couple weeks and its > now 180MB. I use the same development habits as in Pharo 1.4 but there > the image would only be about 40MB. > I already saw that the current 3.0 download has 110.000 instances of arrayâ¦ I wondered if that makes sense. > Using SpaceTally I can see that I have 40 MB of Arrays. And 10MB of > Bitmaps. 8MB of Floats, Strings, & OrderedCollections. > > My domain objects comprise about 20MB of the image. > Can you run ImageCleaner cleanUpForRelease this calls e.g. all the #cleanUp methods of all classes. (We should think about how to call this (or a subset) more regularly in normal operation) Marcus

July 18, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] installing Seaside on Pharo 2.0

by sminni

Thanks ... got the Zinc server to work but could not get to smalltalkhub.com I just get a "Loading please wait" message that sits till I give up What is the way to get the HOSeaside Package regards Sanjay ----- --- Regards, Sanjay -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/installing-Seaside-on-Pharo-2-0-tp4698685p4699247.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

July 18, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] no SortedDictionary available?

by Carlo

Hi Have you tried: http://www.squeaksource.com/BTree Used it long ago and worked well. Regards Carlo On 18 Jul 2013, at 2:10 AM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand <hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: Have a look at: http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~hernan/SortedDictionary use at your own risk, given I have no time for writing tests now. Cheers, HernÃ¡n El 17/07/2013 5:31, Sabine KnÃ¶fel escribiÃ³: > Hi, > > I am looking for a Dictionary which sorts its entries by the keys. > Some Kind of "SortedDictionary". > I assume, there is none - right? > > I only found the OrderPreservingDictionary (which is not the same). > > Background: storing exchangerates by date. > > Sabine > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/no-SortedDictionary-available-tp4699050.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > . >

July 18, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] no SortedDictionary available?

by HernÃ¡n Morales Durand

Have a look at: http://www.smalltalkhub.com/#!/~hernan/SortedDictionary use at your own risk, given I have no time for writing tests now. Cheers, HernÃ¡n El 17/07/2013 5:31, Sabine KnÃ¶fel escribiÃ³: > Hi, > > I am looking for a Dictionary which sorts its entries by the keys. > Some Kind of "SortedDictionary". > I assume, there is none - right? > > I only found the OrderPreservingDictionary (which is not the same). > > Background: storing exchangerates by date. > > Sabine > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/no-SortedDictionary-available-tp4699050.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > . >

July 18, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] development image memory use: 180MB in Pharo 2 vs. 40MB in Pharo 1.4.....

by Camillo Bruni

Did you check on Dictionaries / Sets (+ their Identity* versions) and Symbols as well? Another possibility would non terminated Processes (process browser)? The Arrays themselves already look suspicious. Usually the way to track such objects down is to find and interesting candidate and inspect it, then right click and "explore strong pointers". I hope this helps On 2013-07-17, at 21:59, Paul DeBruicker <pdebruic(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I've been developing in the same Pharo2 image for a couple weeks and its > now 180MB. I use the same development habits as in Pharo 1.4 but there > the image would only be about 40MB. > > Using SpaceTally I can see that I have 40 MB of Arrays. And 10MB of > Bitmaps. 8MB of Floats, Strings, & OrderedCollections. > > My domain objects comprise about 20MB of the image. > > > Is there a way to check for memory leaks over a long period of time? > > Thanks > > Paul >

July 17, 2013

development image memory use: 180MB in Pharo 2 vs. 40MB in Pharo 1.4.....

by Paul DeBruicker

I've been developing in the same Pharo2 image for a couple weeks and its now 180MB. I use the same development habits as in Pharo 1.4 but there the image would only be about 40MB. Using SpaceTally I can see that I have 40 MB of Arrays. And 10MB of Bitmaps. 8MB of Floats, Strings, & OrderedCollections. My domain objects comprise about 20MB of the image. Is there a way to check for memory leaks over a long period of time? Thanks Paul

July 17, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] [ANN] BioSmalltalk published in Bioinformatics Journal

by HernÃ¡n Morales Durand

Hi Marcus, Thank you for the comments, I have been checking the link distribution conditions and they say people can access the article only from the Oxford Journals website for academic purposes, so here it is: http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/07/09/bioinform… Sorry for the inconvenience. Cheers, HernÃ¡n 2013/7/17 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> > > On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:31 PM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand < > hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Doru, I can access the article through the "Full Text (PDF)" link at the > right box titled "This Article". Maybe you have the right columns > collapsed? There is an arrow button "Show all columns" if you cannot see > the link. > > Let me know. > > > > Publishing is the act of making Paper in-accessible to the Public (that's > where the name comes from). > > So what all serious publishers allow you to do is to make the version that > you send them (not their version) available from your > website and/or an online-archive of your employer, > > It is very important to do that, as people will not jump through hoops to > get your paper (e.g. go to the library?). > In the past I send emails to authors to get paper copies, but today I > would just *never* do that. If *you* don't make your > paper available, why should I bother? i will just not read it and not cite > it. > > The journal publishing is just important for your CV and getting tenure > and things like that, the paper the people > really *read* is the one they can download from your website. > > Marcus >

July 17, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Generate Bytecodes manually

by Udo Schneider

On 17.07.13 11:05, Marcus Denker wrote: > What you need to do for that is to implement a class that has the same public API as OpalCompiler and Compilerâ¦ > Then you can set this is the compiler of your class (override #compiler on the class side). > > This compiler then takes care to create the CompiledMethod with your bytecode *and* your source. > > The tools *should* be able to display just anything, but that needs to be double-checked as we changed the tools a lot > and there is no example of methods with non-smalltalk source right now. Thanks for the detailed steps - I think I have all the pieces now for tackling a really crazy idea I have. > Implementing Debugger support is possible, too. For that you need to have a mapping between pc and source for your > language. I didn't even think of the debugger. Mapping the source I have and the pc should be easy - although I'm not quite sure whether it's useful for what I'm trying. But we'll see. Udo

July 17, 2013