June 2013 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] account search

by ClÃ©ment Bera

No don't remove it. It is when someone is assigned to a project and wants to be removed. Then he selects this guy instead. 2013/6/7 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> > > On 07 Jun 2013, at 11:42, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > who is remove(a)me.com on fogbugz? > > I don't know, but I am pretty sure you can safely remove that account :-) > > > > -- ClÃ©ment BÃ©ra Mate Virtual Machine Engineer BÃ¢timent B 40, avenue Halley 59650 *Villeneuve d'Ascq*

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] DateAndTime>>asTime

by JosÃ© ComesaÃ±a

Thank you Sven. I had made the fixes myself, creating a new class for dates (I don't need the complexity of Date just for determining if a date is past, I don't need date arithmetic either). I just wanted to inform, mainly because the bug seems to be still present in Pharo 3.0. Anyway, your solution does not work for the 'd/m/y' pattern, although it does for 'd/m/yy'. I could write the tests you suggest, if you think they are interesting. Regards 2013/6/7 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> > Hi JosÃ©, > > On 07 Jun 2013, at 12:02, JosÃ© ComesaÃ±a <jose.comesana(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello everybody. > > > > I would like to add a new improvement to this thread. > > > > I have noticed that Date class has a bug, or at least something to > improve in readFrom:pattern: method. The initial comment states that "A > year given using only two decimals is considered to be >2000.". > > > > But this seems to be incorrect: if you evaluate > > > > Date readFrom: '07/06/13' readStream pattern: 'd/m/y' > > > > you get: > > > > 7 June 0013 instead of 7 June 2013. > > > > I am working with version #20605 > > The fix would be quite easy: > > year := (inputStream next: 2) asInteger > > should be > > year := 2000 + (inputStream next: 2) asInteger > > A more important problem is that there are no users of #readFrom:pattern: > in the system, not even unit tests. If we want to keep the methods, someone > should start by writing a couple of unit tests. > > Sven > > > Thank you all for your great work. > > > > Regards. > > > > > > 2013/6/6 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> > > can you save an image with the inspector opened on both x and y, x > asTime and y asTime > > and provide a link to it? like that I can inspect it in all detail... > > > > On 2013-06-06, at 17:51, dmacq <dmacq(a)instantiations.com> wrote: > > > > > I tried it again this morning and still had the problem. > > > > > > This is interesting. > > > > > > | x y | > > > x := DateAndTime year: 1991 day: 196 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: 7. > > > y := DateAndTime year: 1991 month: 7 day: 15 hour: 20 minute: 5 > second: 7. > > > x = y <------------------ True > > > > > > But > > > | x y | > > > x := DateAndTime year: 1991 day: 196 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: 7. > > > y := DateAndTime year: 1991 month: 7 day: 15 hour: 20 minute: 5 > second: 7. > > > x asTime = y asTime <------------- False > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/DateAndTime-asTime-tp4691870p4691988.html > > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > >

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Marcus Denker

On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Markus Fritsche <fritsche.markus(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 07.06.2013 11:27, Camillo Bruni wrote: >> you can register on the penelope page. >> avoid the dot in your gmail address (BTW: gmail ignores the dots anyway. you can put as many dots as you want and still receive mails). > Ah, thanks - I think I used that form before with the dot. > > When should I consider myself being a monkey? > When you are a machineâ¦ the idea is that is a trivial captcha. Maybe too complex even for humans;-) Marcus

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] DateAndTime>>asTime

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

Hi JosÃ©, On 07 Jun 2013, at 12:02, JosÃ© ComesaÃ±a <jose.comesana(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everybody. > > I would like to add a new improvement to this thread. > > I have noticed that Date class has a bug, or at least something to improve in readFrom:pattern: method. The initial comment states that "A year given using only two decimals is considered to be >2000.". > > But this seems to be incorrect: if you evaluate > > Date readFrom: '07/06/13' readStream pattern: 'd/m/y' > > you get: > > 7 June 0013 instead of 7 June 2013. > > I am working with version #20605 The fix would be quite easy: year := (inputStream next: 2) asInteger should be year := 2000 + (inputStream next: 2) asInteger A more important problem is that there are no users of #readFrom:pattern: in the system, not even unit tests. If we want to keep the methods, someone should start by writing a couple of unit tests. Sven > Thank you all for your great work. > > Regards. > > > 2013/6/6 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> > can you save an image with the inspector opened on both x and y, x asTime and y asTime > and provide a link to it? like that I can inspect it in all detail... > > On 2013-06-06, at 17:51, dmacq <dmacq(a)instantiations.com> wrote: > > > I tried it again this morning and still had the problem. > > > > This is interesting. > > > > | x y | > > x := DateAndTime year: 1991 day: 196 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: 7. > > y := DateAndTime year: 1991 month: 7 day: 15 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: 7. > > x = y <------------------ True > > > > But > > | x y | > > x := DateAndTime year: 1991 day: 196 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: 7. > > y := DateAndTime year: 1991 month: 7 day: 15 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: 7. > > x asTime = y asTime <------------- False > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/DateAndTime-asTime-tp4691870p4691988.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > >

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] DateAndTime>>asTime

by JosÃ© ComesaÃ±a

Hello everybody. I would like to add a new improvement to this thread. I have noticed that Date class has a bug, or at least something to improve in readFrom:pattern: method. The initial comment states that "A year given using only two decimals is considered to be >2000.". But this seems to be incorrect: if you evaluate Date readFrom: '07/06/13' readStream pattern: 'd/m/y' you get: 7 June 0013 instead of 7 June 2013. I am working with version #20605 Thank you all for your great work. Regards. 2013/6/6 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> > can you save an image with the inspector opened on both x and y, x asTime > and y asTime > and provide a link to it? like that I can inspect it in all detail... > > On 2013-06-06, at 17:51, dmacq <dmacq(a)instantiations.com> wrote: > > > I tried it again this morning and still had the problem. > > > > This is interesting. > > > > | x y | > > x := DateAndTime year: 1991 day: 196 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: 7. > > y := DateAndTime year: 1991 month: 7 day: 15 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: > 7. > > x = y <------------------ True > > > > But > > | x y | > > x := DateAndTime year: 1991 day: 196 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: 7. > > y := DateAndTime year: 1991 month: 7 day: 15 hour: 20 minute: 5 second: > 7. > > x asTime = y asTime <------------- False > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/DateAndTime-asTime-tp4691870p4691988.html > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > >

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] account search

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 07 Jun 2013, at 11:42, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: > who is remove(a)me.com on fogbugz? I don't know, but I am pretty sure you can safely remove that account :-)

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Markus Fritsche

On 07.06.2013 11:27, Camillo Bruni wrote: > you can register on the penelope page. > avoid the dot in your gmail address (BTW: gmail ignores the dots anyway. you can put as many dots as you want and still receive mails). Ah, thanks - I think I used that form before with the dot. When should I consider myself being a monkey? Kind regards, Markus

June 7, 2013

account search

by Camillo Bruni

who is remove(a)me.com on fogbugz?

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Marcus Denker

On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2013-06-07, at 11:20, Markus Fritsche <fritsche.markus(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello Marcus & List, >> >> On 07.06.2013 10:44, Marcus Denker wrote: >>> Normally I thought that fogbugz should send you updates on bugs you reported? We need to check that. >> I got one mail with an URL that I could check for updates... >>> In this case, we have fixed in in 3.0 and 2.0 (the bug as a "Parent Case" for 2.0, >>> this was decided in the discussion and done). >>> We often fix things first in 3.0 to test and then fix it in 2.0 so we are sure the fix >>> works. >> Thank you for explaining. I admit it was late yesterday ;-) >>> So there are two problems: >>> >>> 1) the "RemoteString past end of file" on recent linux. >>> >>> 2) Something strange happens sometimes that reading the source fails. >>> >>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7559/Plugins-Primitives-no-longer-work-af… >>> (it has a parent case for 2.0) >> Can you link to Penelope about the second issue? I'd like to help hunt these two since ubuntu-13.04 is my primary system on a few machines, big to small. > > you can register on the penelope page. > avoid the dot in your gmail address (BTW: gmail ignores the dots anyway. you can put as many dots as you want and still receive mails). We should add a bug tracker entry for that, too. Marcus

June 7, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Changes-File & caching

by Camillo Bruni

On 2013-06-07, at 11:20, Markus Fritsche <fritsche.markus(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Marcus & List, > > On 07.06.2013 10:44, Marcus Denker wrote: >> Normally I thought that fogbugz should send you updates on bugs you reported? We need to check that. > I got one mail with an URL that I could check for updates... >> In this case, we have fixed in in 3.0 and 2.0 (the bug as a "Parent Case" for 2.0, >> this was decided in the discussion and done). >> We often fix things first in 3.0 to test and then fix it in 2.0 so we are sure the fix >> works. > Thank you for explaining. I admit it was late yesterday ;-) >> So there are two problems: >> >> 1) the "RemoteString past end of file" on recent linux. >> >> 2) Something strange happens sometimes that reading the source fails. >> >> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/7559/Plugins-Primitives-no-longer-work-af… >> (it has a parent case for 2.0) > Can you link to Penelope about the second issue? I'd like to help hunt these two since ubuntu-13.04 is my primary system on a few machines, big to small. you can register on the penelope page. avoid the dot in your gmail address (BTW: gmail ignores the dots anyway. you can put as many dots as you want and still receive mails).

June 7, 2013