April 2013 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] a glimpse at new cool text editor made by alain P ; )

by Johan Fabry

On Apr 1, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> In AlainPlantec/Rubric >> >> Now alain is a shy guy and he does not like to announce projects that are >> not finished, but I could not resist. >> > yeah yeah.. i know that :) Igor, are you hiding something? :-) ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile

April 1, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] a glimpse at new cool text editor made by alain P ; )

by Igor Stasenko

On 31 March 2013 20:21, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)free.fr> wrote: > In AlainPlantec/Rubric > > Now alain is a shy guy and he does not like to announce projects that are > not finished, but I could not resist. > yeah yeah.. i know that :) > Stef > > On Mar 30, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > Where is this code? > > 2013/3/30 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> >> >> Thanks alain for this previea >> and Synectique ( http://www.synectique.eu ) for the sponsoring of this >> effort. >> >> Stef >> >> >> >> <a RubTextSurface(902561792).png> > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

April 1, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Slots

by Sean P. DeNigris

Marcus Denker-4 wrote > http://rmod.lille.inria.fr/archives/papers/Verw11a-OOSPLA11-FlexibleObjectL… Sounds exciting! I particularly like the built-in verification of values and even relationship to data, possibly in other objects! ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Slots-tp4679183p4679204.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 1, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Open Source OODB's

by Denis Kudriashov

Hi 2013/4/1 Victor Stan <victor.stan(a)gmail.com> > Hi, > > Are there any open source OODB's out there? Alternatives to GemStone? > I think there is no alternavise to GemStone. Because GemStome is not just data store. It is applicaton server where you work in multi user image system. Imagine single Pharo image which can work under different parallel VM instances (maybe running on different machines) which have concurrent access to same image objects, can commit it changes (save same image).

April 1, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Slots

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 1, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Thomas Worthington <thomas(a)technouveau.co.uk> wrote: > I notice that "Slots" are slated for addition in Pharo 3.0. Is there anywhere I can see which model of "slots" is being suggested? http://rmod.lille.inria.fr/archives/papers/Verw11a-OOSPLA11-FlexibleObjectL… > I'm not sure that slots, in the sense of Javascript, are a good idea generally and, in the broader context, I'm very unhappy with the idea of messing with Smalltalk's generally clean syntax by adding new language features. Could the desired effects be achieved by subclassing Behavour or somesuch high-level approach? The good news is that there are -> no vm changes -> no changes in the syntax So maybe it is done exactly as you suggest? I guess. For the integration, there are two steps 1) Layouts and new classBuilder This change is purely internal. There are Slot objects describing instance variables, but there are actually no new slot types and the definition template for subclassing is unchanged. You can look at an image like that here: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/Slot/ 2) Actually add new Slots and support in the tools for those. Marcus

April 1, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Slots

by Damien Cassou

Some links on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15609209/why-instancevariablenames-is-a-… On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Thomas Worthington <thomas(a)technouveau.co.uk> wrote: > I notice that "Slots" are slated for addition in Pharo 3.0. Is there > anywhere I can see which model of "slots" is being suggested? I'm not sure > that slots, in the sense of Javascript, are a good idea generally and, in > the broader context, I'm very unhappy with the idea of messing with > Smalltalk's generally clean syntax by adding new language features. Could > the desired effects be achieved by subclassing Behavour or somesuch > high-level approach? > > -- > Thomas Worthington > -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." Winston Churchill

April 1, 2013

Slots

by Thomas Worthington

I notice that "Slots" are slated for addition in Pharo 3.0. Is there anywhere I can see which model of "slots" is being suggested? I'm not sure that slots, in the sense of Javascript, are a good idea generally and, in the broader context, I'm very unhappy with the idea of messing with Smalltalk's generally clean syntax by adding new language features. Could the desired effects be achieved by subclassing Behavour or somesuch high-level approach? -- Thomas Worthington

April 1, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-project] news about the association and the consortium

by Luc Fabresse

great! thanks to all. Luc #Luc 2013/3/31 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > Hi guys > > We were checking a bit the situation and this is promising :) > > -> Consortium: 9 Members, 1 Sponsor ==> 20500 EUR/Year > -> Association: 47 Members ==> 4040 EUR/Year > > We really think that we can reach the first goal of enough money for 1 > full time engineer > within the next year > > Stef and Marcus >

April 1, 2013

#pharoconf #mooseday on twitter

by Tudor Girba

Hi, If you want to tweet/follow what is going on at PharoConf and MooseDay, please use #pharoconf and #mooseday. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "Beauty is where we see it."

April 1, 2013

Re: [Pharo-users] Open Source OODB's

by GÃ¶ran Krampe

On 04/01/2013 05:26 AM, Victor Stan wrote: > Magma seems to have some potential... Also see Oak: http://goran.krampe.se/2012/12/29/oak/ ...which is an OODBish layer on top of Riak. Although I am itching to put HyperDex as backend - but my binding to HyperDex is not ready yet. regards, GÃ¶ran PS. I love OODBs too but think the new NoSQL dbs in combination with some added "sugar" is a potent option.

April 1, 2013