June 2012 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

[ESUG 2012] Call for sponsors

by Luc Fabresse

Dear Smalltalkers, As you know ESUG (European Smalltalk User Group) is a nonprofit organization, ran by a bunch of volunteers which aims at promoting Smalltalk (http://www.esug.org/Promotion) ESUG does have multiple actions such as sponsoring Smalltalk-related publications (articles and books), encouraging developers and more specifically young students to learn Smalltalk (Student Volunteers program) and build innovative software using Smalltalk (SummerTalk, ESUG Awards, "Support your project" program, Umbrella for GSoC, ...). ESUG revenue comes only from sponsoring, donations, and registrations to the ESUG yearly event (for 20 years!). Therefore, we invite you to support the ESUG actions by encouraging your companies and organizations to sponsor ESUG. As previous years, we have three sponsoring packages ( http://www.esug.org/About/BecomeSponsor) * Silver ESUG Sponsor: By paying â¬ 500 per year, the logo of your company/association is displayed during the ESUG conference, and you are also recognized as a sponsor on our ESUG website http://www.esug.org. You are entitled to mention that you are an ESUG sponsor, and to use the ESUG logo in that context. * Gold ESUG Sponsor: By paying â¬ 1000 per year, you get all of the above, and ESUG correspondence and distributions (CD, Documentation) will feature your logo. You also get a 10% fee reduction on the ESUG events for up to 5 people of your organisation. * Platinum ESUG Sponsor: By Paying â¬ 2000 per year, you get all of the above, but you get a 20% fee reduction on the ESUG events for up to 10 people of your organisation. For any further information, you can contact us directly at board(a)esug.org. Best regards, Luc Fabresse On behalf of the ESUG board

June 14, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Need help with Pharo 1.4 packages.

by Igor Stasenko

On 14 June 2012 05:33, irfankhan1 <irfankhan(a)hotmail.ca> wrote: > Thanks for help really appreciate Â that solved my problem, > > I am still stuck with this package called HostMenus-Mac Â the project which > i am trying to move on to Pharo 1.4, guy who wrote this project used startUp > class method from this package,Any alternative i can use to replace this in > Pharo 1.4 > im not sure i understood what he uses? If project uses host menus , there is no replacement: we removed it. > > Thanks, > Irfan. > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Need-help-with-Pharo-1-4-packages-tp4632451p4634718.h… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

June 14, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Need help with Pharo 1.4 packages.

by irfankhan1

Thanks for help really appreciate that solved my problem, I am still stuck with this package called HostMenus-Mac the project which i am trying to move on to Pharo 1.4, guy who wrote this project used startUp class method from this package,Any alternative i can use to replace this in Pharo 1.4 Thanks, Irfan. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Need-help-with-Pharo-1-4-packages-tp4632451p4634718.h… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

June 14, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] identifying zip and comparing to current local Pharo install

by Robert Shiplett

Entered as Issue 6061: place release ID in filename inside the one-click app zip thx R Canada On 13 June 2012 13:39, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > On Jun 13, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Robert Shiplett wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Would it be a nuisance for a file such as >> >> Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick.zip >> >> to include an empty text file named >> >> Â 14438 >> >> or to add that id to the readme along with date (preferably the former >> - but since the date is being written there anyway ... ) >> >> I no longer have the DASD on this laptop to keep all of these zip's, >> but at the same time like our clean install using just 'Pharo-1.4' >> directory naming. >> >> Comparing the dates in README.txt seems silly when the zip already >> carries an id. >> >> Just one of those little things that makes morning coffee more >> enjoyable ... (one less needless vexation) > > > > Yes, we should do that. > > Can you add a ticket in the issue tracker? > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > >

June 13, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] identifying zip and comparing to current local Pharo install

by Marcus Denker

On Jun 13, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Robert Shiplett wrote: > Hi > > Would it be a nuisance for a file such as > > Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick.zip > > to include an empty text file named > > 14438 > > or to add that id to the readme along with date (preferably the former > - but since the date is being written there anyway ... ) > > I no longer have the DASD on this laptop to keep all of these zip's, > but at the same time like our clean install using just 'Pharo-1.4' > directory naming. > > Comparing the dates in README.txt seems silly when the zip already > carries an id. > > Just one of those little things that makes morning coffee more > enjoyable ... (one less needless vexation) Yes, we should do that. Can you add a ticket in the issue tracker? -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de

June 13, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] load of OB 1.4.1 failed in release Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick

by Esteban Lorenzano

yeah... stupid space in incorrect place :) should be working now On Jun 13, 2012, at 6:05 PM, Robert Shiplett wrote: > spec > name: 'OCForOB'; > requires: #('OmniBrowser' 'OB-Standard' ); > file: ' OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6'; > repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/OCompletion'. > > On 13 June 2012 13:02, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> arises from >> >> MetacelloFetchingMCSpecLoader >> >> linearLoadPackageSpec: packageSpec gofer: gofer >> >> >> >> On 13 June 2012 13:01, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> MetacelloCommonMCSpecLoader >>> >>> retryingResolvePackageSpecReferences: packageSpec gofer: gofer >>> >>> On 13 June 2012 12:59, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> After my 'step' 3 ... >>>> >>>> Could not resolve OC for OB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13 June 2012 12:55, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> I'll start from scratch to validate .. but >>>>> >>>>> On 1st pass transcript ended as >>>>> >>>>> Fetched -> OB-Refactory-GuillermoPolito.258 --- >>>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB --- >>>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB >>>>> Fetched -> OB-Regex-lr.30 --- http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB --- >>>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB >>>>> ...RETRY-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>>>> ...RETRY-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>>>> ...FAILED-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 13 June 2012 12:34, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> fails with which error? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 13, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Robert Shiplett wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> load of OmniBrowser 1.4.1 failed in release Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick >>>>>>> newly installed on Win32 XP SP3 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3 steps: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MetacelloConfigurationBrowser open. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 'Load configuration' popup menu option selected for Estaban .157 config >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "no sign of any side-effect visible to user " >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 'Load configuration and stable version' popup menu option selected for >>>>>>> Estaban .157 config >>>>>>> >>>>>>> " then fails after many stages of load and compile " >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >

June 13, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] load of OB 1.4.1 failed in release Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick

by Robert Shiplett

spec name: 'OCForOB'; requires: #('OmniBrowser' 'OB-Standard' ); file: ' OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6'; repository: 'http://www.squeaksource.com/OCompletion'. On 13 June 2012 13:02, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: > arises from > > MetacelloFetchingMCSpecLoader > > Â linearLoadPackageSpec: packageSpec gofer: gofer > > > > On 13 June 2012 13:01, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> MetacelloCommonMCSpecLoader >> >> retryingResolvePackageSpecReferences: packageSpec gofer: gofer >> >> On 13 June 2012 12:59, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> After my 'step' 3 ... >>> >>> Could not resolve OC for OB >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13 June 2012 12:55, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I'll start from scratch to validate .. but >>>> >>>> On 1st pass transcript ended as >>>> >>>> Fetched -> OB-Refactory-GuillermoPolito.258 --- >>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB --- >>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB >>>> Fetched -> OB-Regex-lr.30 --- http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB --- >>>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB >>>> ...RETRY-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>>> ...RETRY-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>>> ...FAILED-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13 June 2012 12:34, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> fails with which error? >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 13, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Robert Shiplett wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> load of OmniBrowser 1.4.1 failed in release Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick >>>>>> newly installed on Win32 XP SP3 >>>>>> >>>>>> 3 steps: >>>>>> >>>>>> MetacelloConfigurationBrowser open. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 'Load configuration' popup menu option selected for Estaban .157 config >>>>>> >>>>>> "no sign of any side-effect visible to user " >>>>>> >>>>>> 'Load configuration and stable version' popup menu option selected for >>>>>> Estaban .157 config >>>>>> >>>>>> " then fails after many stages of load and compile " >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>

June 13, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] load of OB 1.4.1 failed in release Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick

by Esteban Lorenzano

yeah... I commited today a fix to use new ocompletion instead the old one... and looks like metacello is refusing to find it... looking it... On Jun 13, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Robert Shiplett wrote: > MetacelloCommonMCSpecLoader > > retryingResolvePackageSpecReferences: packageSpec gofer: gofer > > On 13 June 2012 12:59, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> After my 'step' 3 ... >> >> Could not resolve OC for OB >> >> >> >> On 13 June 2012 12:55, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'll start from scratch to validate .. but >>> >>> On 1st pass transcript ended as >>> >>> Fetched -> OB-Refactory-GuillermoPolito.258 --- >>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB --- >>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB >>> Fetched -> OB-Regex-lr.30 --- http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB --- >>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB >>> ...RETRY-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>> ...RETRY-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>> ...FAILED-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13 June 2012 12:34, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> fails with which error? >>>> >>>> On Jun 13, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Robert Shiplett wrote: >>>> >>>>> load of OmniBrowser 1.4.1 failed in release Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick >>>>> newly installed on Win32 XP SP3 >>>>> >>>>> 3 steps: >>>>> >>>>> MetacelloConfigurationBrowser open. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 'Load configuration' popup menu option selected for Estaban .157 config >>>>> >>>>> "no sign of any side-effect visible to user " >>>>> >>>>> 'Load configuration and stable version' popup menu option selected for >>>>> Estaban .157 config >>>>> >>>>> " then fails after many stages of load and compile " >>>>> >>>> >>>> >

June 13, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] load of OB 1.4.1 failed in release Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick

by Robert Shiplett

arises from MetacelloFetchingMCSpecLoader linearLoadPackageSpec: packageSpec gofer: gofer On 13 June 2012 13:01, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: > MetacelloCommonMCSpecLoader > > retryingResolvePackageSpecReferences: packageSpec gofer: gofer > > On 13 June 2012 12:59, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> After my 'step' 3 ... >> >> Could not resolve OC for OB >> >> >> >> On 13 June 2012 12:55, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'll start from scratch to validate .. but >>> >>> On 1st pass transcript ended as >>> >>> Fetched -> OB-Refactory-GuillermoPolito.258 --- >>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB --- >>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB >>> Fetched -> OB-Regex-lr.30 --- http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB --- >>> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB >>> ...RETRY-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>> ...RETRY-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>> ...FAILED-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13 June 2012 12:34, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> fails with which error? >>>> >>>> On Jun 13, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Robert Shiplett wrote: >>>> >>>>> load of OmniBrowser 1.4.1 failed in release Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick >>>>> newly installed on Win32 XP SP3 >>>>> >>>>> 3 steps: >>>>> >>>>> MetacelloConfigurationBrowser open. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 'Load configuration' popup menu option selected for Estaban .157 config >>>>> >>>>> "no sign of any side-effect visible to user " >>>>> >>>>> 'Load configuration and stable version' popup menu option selected for >>>>> Estaban .157 config >>>>> >>>>> " then fails after many stages of load and compile " >>>>> >>>> >>>>

June 13, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] load of OB 1.4.1 failed in release Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick

by Robert Shiplett

MetacelloCommonMCSpecLoader retryingResolvePackageSpecReferences: packageSpec gofer: gofer On 13 June 2012 12:59, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: > After my 'step' 3 ... > > Could not resolve OC for OB > > > > On 13 June 2012 12:55, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> I'll start from scratch to validate .. but >> >> On 1st pass transcript ended as >> >> Fetched -> OB-Refactory-GuillermoPolito.258 --- >> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB --- >> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB >> Fetched -> OB-Regex-lr.30 --- http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB --- >> http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoOB >> ...RETRY-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >> ...RETRY-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >> ...FAILED-> OCForOB-EstebanLorenzano.6 >> >> >> >> On 13 June 2012 12:34, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> fails with which error? >>> >>> On Jun 13, 2012, at 5:15 PM, Robert Shiplett wrote: >>> >>>> load of OmniBrowser 1.4.1 failed in release Pharo-1.4-14438-OneClick >>>> newly installed on Win32 XP SP3 >>>> >>>> 3 steps: >>>> >>>> MetacelloConfigurationBrowser open. >>>> >>>> >>>> 'Load configuration' popup menu option selected for Estaban .157 config >>>> >>>> "no sign of any side-effect visible to user " >>>> >>>> 'Load configuration and stable version' popup menu option selected for >>>> Estaban .157 config >>>> >>>> " then fails after many stages of load and compile " >>>> >>> >>>

June 13, 2012