October 2012 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

thanks for the information. Stef On Oct 1, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Camillo Bruni wrote: > > On 2012-10-01, at 15:06, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > >>> Should Pharo run with the squeak-vm? An ARM build for the squeak-vm exists... >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> Marc >>>> >>> >>> Yes, Pharo should run on any recent squeak-vm. If it crashes, it's a VM bug. >> >> I'm not sure. :) >> We fixed a lot of code in the filePlugin and friends. > > most of it is backwards compatible, meaning that unless you explicitly rely > on the new filePlugin features it won't fail. And in the worst case you should > get a warning, but certainly not a crash ;) > >

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] persist data across a redirect..

by sergio_101

oops! posted this to the wrong group.. my bad.. sorry.. On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:34 AM, sergio_101 <sergio.rrd(a)gmail.com> wrote: > the way the facebook authorization scheme works is as follows: > > 1. on the first go round, facebook sends a POST with some data in it > that needs to be parsed to pull an authorization code out of it. > 2. if the app isn't authorized, i need to redirect to an authorization > dialog to so that the user can authorize my app. > 3. once the user does that, my app receives an oauth code, and i am on > my way. > > i have everything working, except, i am not sure where to store the > authorization code.. > > in my main component's renderOn, it looks to see if the a instance > variable 'oauthToken' is set. if not, it renders some javascript that > is really just a redirect to the facebook authorization screen. > > once the app is authorized, 'oauthToken' is set to the correct value. > > then, the authorization dialog sends the request BACK to the root > url.. > > everything works correctly..BUT.. on the second time back, the > redirect from facebook, it looks like it starts a brand new session > (there is a new instance of the main component created). > > i was hoping that this would all be one session, and that i could just > set an instance variable once, and not even touch the session, but i > don't think this is going to happen. plus, it looks like i will be > firing up a new session on return anyway, so what i have saved in > session will be lost. > > anyone have any ideas on how to cleanly persist this variable after > facebook's redirect? > > thanks! > > -- > ---- > peace, > sergio > photographer, journalist, visionary > > http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com > http://www.CodingForHire.com > http://www.coffee-black.com > http://www.painlessfrugality.com > http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 > http://www.facebook.com/sergio101 -- ---- peace, sergio photographer, journalist, visionary http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com http://www.CodingForHire.com http://www.coffee-black.com http://www.painlessfrugality.com http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 http://www.facebook.com/sergio101

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by Marc Hanisch

2012/10/1 Camillo Bruni <camillobruni(a)gmail.com>: >>> >>> Yes, Pharo should run on any recent squeak-vm. If it crashes, it's a VM bug. >> >> I'm not sure. :) >> We fixed a lot of code in the filePlugin and friends. > > most of it is backwards compatible, meaning that unless you explicitly rely > on the new filePlugin features it won't fail. And in the worst case you should > get a warning, but certainly not a crash ;) > Thanks for the hints! I will try it with squeak-vm again. I think it crashed because the Toshiba AC100 has just 512MB of RAM. Greetings, Marc -- â Esperanto - Lingvo internacia â http://www.esperanto.de â http://e-gikoj.com â

Oct. 1, 2012

persist data across a redirect..

by sergio_101

the way the facebook authorization scheme works is as follows: 1. on the first go round, facebook sends a POST with some data in it that needs to be parsed to pull an authorization code out of it. 2. if the app isn't authorized, i need to redirect to an authorization dialog to so that the user can authorize my app. 3. once the user does that, my app receives an oauth code, and i am on my way. i have everything working, except, i am not sure where to store the authorization code.. in my main component's renderOn, it looks to see if the a instance variable 'oauthToken' is set. if not, it renders some javascript that is really just a redirect to the facebook authorization screen. once the app is authorized, 'oauthToken' is set to the correct value. then, the authorization dialog sends the request BACK to the root url.. everything works correctly..BUT.. on the second time back, the redirect from facebook, it looks like it starts a brand new session (there is a new instance of the main component created). i was hoping that this would all be one session, and that i could just set an instance variable once, and not even touch the session, but i don't think this is going to happen. plus, it looks like i will be firing up a new session on return anyway, so what i have saved in session will be lost. anyone have any ideas on how to cleanly persist this variable after facebook's redirect? thanks! -- ---- peace, sergio photographer, journalist, visionary http://www.ThoseOptimizeGuys.com http://www.CodingForHire.com http://www.coffee-black.com http://www.painlessfrugality.com http://www.twitter.com/sergio_101 http://www.facebook.com/sergio101

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by Camillo Bruni

On 2012-10-01, at 15:06, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: >> Should Pharo run with the squeak-vm? An ARM build for the squeak-vm exists... >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Marc >>> >> >> Yes, Pharo should run on any recent squeak-vm. If it crashes, it's a VM bug. > > I'm not sure. :) > We fixed a lot of code in the filePlugin and friends. most of it is backwards compatible, meaning that unless you explicitly rely on the new filePlugin features it won't fail. And in the worst case you should get a warning, but certainly not a crash ;)

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

> Should Pharo run with the squeak-vm? An ARM build for the squeak-vm exists... >> >> Thank you, >> Marc >> > > Yes, Pharo should run on any recent squeak-vm. If it crashes, it's a VM bug. I'm not sure. :) We fixed a lot of code in the filePlugin and friends. Stef

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by David T. Lewis

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:53:44PM +0200, Marc Hanisch wrote: > Should Pharo run with the squeak-vm? An ARM build for the squeak-vm exists... > > Thank you, > Marc > Yes, Pharo should run on any recent squeak-vm. If it crashes, it's a VM bug. Dave > 2012/10/1 St??phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > > So far there is no JIT for ARM. > > > > Stef > >

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by Marc Hanisch

Should Pharo run with the squeak-vm? An ARM build for the squeak-vm exists... Thank you, Marc 2012/10/1 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>: > So far there is no JIT for ARM. > > Stef >

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by Denis Kudriashov

What about StackVM? 2012/10/1 StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> > So far there is no JIT for ARM. > > Stef > > On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Marc Hanisch wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm running Ubuntu ARM (armhf) on my Toshiba AC100. With the help of > apt-get > > I've installed the squeak-vm and the squeak-image, which both run fine. > > > > Now I've downloaded the Pharo-image, but could not find the cog-vm for > ARM. > > Running the Pharo-image with the squeak-vm just gives me a segmentation > > fault: > > > > -1550458048 [] in ByteSymbol>? > > /usr/bin/squeak: line 277: 4603 Segmentation fault (core dumped) > $VM > > > > I don't know if it is in general possible to run the image with the > > squeak-vm. Does an ARM-build for the cog-vm exists? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Marc > > > > >

Oct. 1, 2012

Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo on Ubuntu ARM

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

So far there is no JIT for ARM. Stef On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Marc Hanisch wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running Ubuntu ARM (armhf) on my Toshiba AC100. With the help of apt-get > I've installed the squeak-vm and the squeak-image, which both run fine. > > Now I've downloaded the Pharo-image, but could not find the cog-vm for ARM. > Running the Pharo-image with the squeak-vm just gives me a segmentation > fault: > > -1550458048 [] in ByteSymbol>? > /usr/bin/squeak: line 277: 4603 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $VM > > I don't know if it is in general possible to run the image with the > squeak-vm. Does an ARM-build for the cog-vm exists? > > Thanks in advance, > Marc >

Oct. 1, 2012