March 2011 - Pharo-users - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-users] Do you have a tool that works on Pharo ?

by Mariano Martinez Peck

It is not necesary that you document 10 pages. Just put the name of the project, explain in 2 lines what it is, how to install it, and if you have documentation in some other place, a link. And that's all. For example, I have in mind these projects: aidaWeb scribo Iliad RFB autotest mockery XML support Help system PetitParser Helvetia Opal Gofer RefactoringBrowser Chronos Citizen FileSystem Grease ODBC OSProcess XML-RPC XStreams but I don't know what each of them is exacty, how to install it, or its link. So, if their developers help us it would be cool cheers Mariano On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < marianopeck(a)gmail.com> wrote: > ifTrue: [ self writeOnPharoBook: aTool] > > We need to improve our documentation. Right now, we have a collaborative > book where everyone can join and write: http://book.pharo-project.org/ > > Here we have a list of tools that run on Pharo: > http://book.pharo-project.org/book/PharoTools > and it is REALLY important to have such list updated and maintained. > > So, if you have a tool that works in pharo and it is not there, please add > it. If you don't have a user, I can create one for you. If you are TOO lazy, > you can send by email the text to me and I write it. > > Thanks > > Mariano >

March 20, 2011

Do you have a tool that works on Pharo ?

by Mariano Martinez Peck

ifTrue: [ self writeOnPharoBook: aTool] We need to improve our documentation. Right now, we have a collaborative book where everyone can join and write: http://book.pharo-project.org/ Here we have a list of tools that run on Pharo: http://book.pharo-project.org/book/PharoTools and it is REALLY important to have such list updated and maintained. So, if you have a tool that works in pharo and it is not there, please add it. If you don't have a user, I can create one for you. If you are TOO lazy, you can send by email the text to me and I write it. Thanks Mariano

March 20, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Riak Interface for Pharo Smalltalk

by Mariano Martinez Peck

I can create a user for you. Just let me know. Cheers Mariano On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 3:43 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr > wrote: > +1 > > On Mar 19, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > You should update > > > > http://book.pharo-project.org/book/PharoTools/ > > > > for both, zinc and riak binding > > > > otherwise, people forget or never read this email > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)beta9.be> > wrote: > > > > On 14 Mar 2011, at 22:59, Runar Jordahl wrote: > > > > > I have published the first beta version of a Pharo Smalltalk interface > > > to Bashoâs key-value database âRiakâ: > > > > http://blog.epigent.com/2011/03/riak-interface-for-pharo-smalltalk.html > > > > > > Regards > > > Runar Jordahl > > > http://blog.epigent.com/ > > > > Pretty cool! > > > > Do you have anything to tell about performance ? > > Are you satisfied ? > > > > Sven > > > > PS: It is also good to see that you are using Zinc HTTP Components ;-) > > > > > > > > > > >

March 19, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Riak Interface for Pharo Smalltalk

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

+1 On Mar 19, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > You should update > > http://book.pharo-project.org/book/PharoTools/ > > for both, zinc and riak binding > > otherwise, people forget or never read this email > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)beta9.be> wrote: > > On 14 Mar 2011, at 22:59, Runar Jordahl wrote: > > > I have published the first beta version of a Pharo Smalltalk interface > > to Bashoâs key-value database âRiakâ: > > http://blog.epigent.com/2011/03/riak-interface-for-pharo-smalltalk.html > > > > Regards > > Runar Jordahl > > http://blog.epigent.com/ > > Pretty cool! > > Do you have anything to tell about performance ? > Are you satisfied ? > > Sven > > PS: It is also good to see that you are using Zinc HTTP Components ;-) > > > >

March 19, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Riak Interface for Pharo Smalltalk

by Mariano Martinez Peck

You should update http://book.pharo-project.org/book/PharoTools/ for both, zinc and riak binding otherwise, people forget or never read this email On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)beta9.be>wrote: > > On 14 Mar 2011, at 22:59, Runar Jordahl wrote: > > > I have published the first beta version of a Pharo Smalltalk interface > > to Bashoâs key-value database âRiakâ: > > http://blog.epigent.com/2011/03/riak-interface-for-pharo-smalltalk.html > > > > Regards > > Runar Jordahl > > http://blog.epigent.com/ > > Pretty cool! > > Do you have anything to tell about performance ? > Are you satisfied ? > > Sven > > PS: It is also good to see that you are using Zinc HTTP Components ;-) > > > >

March 19, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Laying out Morphs with submorphs outside their bounds

by Sean P. DeNigris

Pat Maddox-3 wrote: > > Did you ever solve this? I think the way to go is with an invisible > container morph, that all of these little bubbles get attached to. Did you > try that? What happened? I didn't solve it yet. I have an invisible parent morph, but I set its size to 0@0. The reason I didn't just have it cover the total area of the composite is that I want mouse actions (e.g. clicks) that are within the area but not actually on one of the bubbles to go through to the background. I guess I could override the event handlers and forward them manually, but I thought someone might know a better way. Thanks. Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Laying-out-Morphs-with-submorphs-outside-their-bounds… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

March 18, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-project] [call for help] Bugtracker

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr>wrote: > > There is a bug tracker at > > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list > > With currently 524 open bug reports. > > With 1.2Core now being released, it would help *a lot* if people who > submitted a report would > check that report in the loght of a released 1.2 and an actively > developing 1.3... > > -> Has the bug already been fixed? Reports that are already fixed > are just incredible wasteful. > -> Does the submitted code need to be updated for 1.3? > -> Did someone ask a question in the meantime? > -> after a long discussion, wouldn't a sumary help to understand > what the > next action is? > > *A lot* of the reports could really need some love from the person who > submitted it orginally. > > We should really think about some scheme to auto-close bug reports. E.g. if > someone asks a question > and the original submitter thinks that it's not even worth to anwer "I > don't know", then a bug report should > be closed after some generous amount of time (e.g. 6 Months), as it's > definitly not important. > > Marcus > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > > >

March 18, 2011

[ANN] Last SqueakDBX release and news!

by Mariano Martinez Peck

Hi folks. We just wanted to let you know that we released SqueakDBX 1.3, which is a minor release with some bugfixes, code clean up, and integration of some functionality that others developed. For more details about this small release please check: http://www.squeakdbx.org/ChangeLog As you may know, ESUG sponsored once again SqueakDBX. However, this is the last release of SqueakDBX with this name. The project was finally renamed to DBXTalk, since we can reuse the class prefix ;) joke. For the moment we are starting to work in a new repository, but this is just for us. You, as developer, right now, have to use the repository and configuration as always. Just forget about DBXTalk for now ;) Cheers SqueakDBX team

March 18, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] [SqueakDBX] Problems

by Mariano Martinez Peck

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Facundo Vozzi <facundov79(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Beniot, > I'm using SquekDBX on Squeak 4.2 and it works fin but I don't know what > DBXTalk is about. > > Please please, forget for the mement about DBXTalk. As you may have read, ESUG is sponsoring once again SqueakDBX, but we renamed it to DBXTalk. But this is still private, broken, and we are developing there. YOU must stay using SqueakDBX repository, with the Metacello configurations in MetacelloRepostirory...like if nohing had happened ;) Once DBXTalk is ready, we will let you know. Thanks Mariano > Do you need the installation steps for SqueakDBX? > > See you, > FV > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Benoit St-Jean <bstjean(a)yahoo.com>wrote: > >> I've downloaded the Squeak 4.2 All-in-One file for windows, installed >> Squeak, downloaded the necessary DLLs for OpenDBX for Windows and loaded the >> Metacello necessary stuff without problem. >> >> Now, I've been struggling to install DBXTalk and SqueakDBX. Has anyone >> tried installing those from a ***fresh-clean*** Squeak 4.2 image ? Besides >> the 2 underscore settings you have to change to be able to get passed the >> first 2 errors, there always seems to be something missing. Now, I'm stuck >> with the SmartSyntaxInterpreterPlugin class missing. >> >> Can anyone try loading DBXTalk and describe the process, step-by-step. Am >> I missing something obvious? >> >> tia >> >> ----------------- >> Benoit St-Jean >> Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean >> A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero. >> (Albert Einstein) >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SqueakDBX mailing list >> SqueakDBX(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/squeakdbx >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > SqueakDBX mailing list > SqueakDBX(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/squeakdbx > >

March 18, 2011

Re: [Pharo-users] Laying out Morphs with submorphs outside their bounds

by Pat Maddox

Did you ever solve this? I think the way to go is with an invisible container morph, that all of these little bubbles get attached to. Did you try that? What happened? Pat On Mar 15, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > Now that I think about it, the question is really: how does one create a > morph that is made up of multiple non-overlapping morphs with no background? > > Sean > > -- > View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Laying-out-Morphs-with-submorphs-outside-their-bounds… > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

March 17, 2011