Why just don't we honor Didier H. Besset and leave it as it was, Numerical Methods in Smalltalk? That way, regardless of your favorite Smalltalk implementation, there will always be a "Numerical Methods in Smalltalk" package somewhere! The same way there's no GlorpPharo : it's Glorp everywhere!  ----------------- Benoît St-Jean Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean Twitter: @BenLeChialeux Pinterest: benoitstjean IRC: lamneth Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com "A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein) From: Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> To: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 1:43 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Call about Numerical Methods in Pharo :) On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV. What is so much pharo specific in this library? Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split?
We can think of a more neutral name. Any idea for a new name ? Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/