Why just don't we honor Didier H. Besset and leave it as it was, Numerical Methods in Smalltalk?

That way, regardless of your favorite Smalltalk implementation, there will always be a "Numerical Methods in Smalltalk" package somewhere!

The same way there's no GlorpPharo : it's Glorp everywhere!

-----------------
Beno��t St-Jean
Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean
Twitter: @BenLeChialeux
Pinterest: benoitstjean
IRC: lamneth
Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com
"A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero". (A. Einstein)

From: Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com>
To: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Call about Numerical Methods in Pharo :)

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Nicolas Cellier
<nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
> SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV.
> What is so much pharo specific in this library?
> Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split?

We can think of a more neutral name.
Any idea for a new name ?

Regards,

--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/