2016-03-04 19:51 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com>:
I personally never liked the name âSciSmalltalkâ. âSciPharoâ is much better in my opinion PhaNum is also okay to me.
SciSmalltalk is ugly. Currently, there is no package named SciSmalltalk. SciSmalltalk is just: - an aggregate of packages (a metacello configuration) - a repository (github + Smalltalkhub) If you name the Metacello configuration SciPharo, it's OK, because it does not really exclude any goodwill contributing from another Smalltalk flavour. If you name the repositories SciPharo, you start tainting a bit more... But well.
Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Mar 2, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Nicolas Cellier < nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV. What is so much pharo specific in this library? Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split?
2016-03-02 14:56 GMT+01:00 Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com>:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
This is great news!
I would be interested in time series and distributions as well.
Distributions are already there. I start some early work on time series.
-- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/