2016-03-04 19:51 GMT+01:00 Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com>:

I personally never liked the name ��SciSmalltalk��. ��SciPharo�� is much better in my opinion
PhaNum is also okay to me.��

SciSmalltalk is ugly.
Currently, there is no package named SciSmalltalk.
SciSmalltalk is just:
- an aggregate of packages (a metacello configuration)

- a repository (github + Smalltalkhub)

If you name the Metacello configuration SciPharo, it's OK,
because it does not really exclude any goodwill contributing from another Smalltalk flavour.

If you name the repositories SciPharo, you start tainting a bit more... But well.

��

Alexandre
--��
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel ��http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

On Mar 2, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:

SciPharo? Not so great news from my POV.
What is so much pharo specific in this library?
Is Smalltalk scientific community large enough for yet another split?

2016-03-02 14:56 GMT+01:00 Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com>:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> This is great news!
>
> I would be interested in time series and distributions as well.

Distributions are already there. I start some early work on time series.

--
Serge Stinckwich
UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/