On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr
wrote:
mariano
did you use MC2?
I tried. I even publish SqueakDBX on sourcetalk, but I have several problems. I couldn't make it work well :( However, I think having a better control version system will help pharo. Even if you have to work and spend time in MC2. I was discussed several times in different mailing lists, but I really don't like monticello. What I don't like is that I always have to save a hole package instead of a simple class or a method. The level of unit in MC (packge) is too big for me. has Pharo a plan of using a better control version system ? cheers, Mariano
I think when Pharo has its own code repository should be using new monticello 2 and sourcetalk
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project