On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:43 PM, St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
mariano

did you use MC2?

I tried. I even publish SqueakDBX on sourcetalk, but I have several problems. I couldn't make it work well :(��� However, I think having a better control version system will help pharo. Even if you have to work and spend time in MC2.

I was discussed several times in different mailing lists, but I really don't like monticello. What I don't like is that I always have to save a hole package instead of a simple class or a method. The level of unit in MC (packge) is too big for me.

has Pharo a plan of using a better control version system ?

cheers,

Mariano




> I think when Pharo has its own code repository should be using new
> monticello 2 and sourcetalk

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project