[Pharo-project] [Fwd: Re: preferences refactoring]
Stephane wrote:
Ideally I would like to have pharo and squeak versions separated (may be the packages should have a OB-Squeak and OB-Pharo). else we will never make real progress.
Dear Santa, I would also like to see an own http://www.pharosource.org/.com MC repository server, otherwise confusion will grow in both worlds the more progress happens. There we could host all "pharo-working" packages. Maybe this image can run on the same hardware but should be accessible from another URL. Thx Torsten -- Neu: GMX FreeDSL Komplettanschluss mit DSL 6.000 Flatrate + Telefonanschluss für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
Stephane wrote:
Ideally I would like to have pharo and squeak versions separated (may be the packages should have a OB-Squeak and OB-Pharo). else we will never make real progress.
Dear Santa,
I would also like to see an own http://www.pharosource.org/.com MC repository server, otherwise confusion will grow in both worlds the more progress happens. There we could host all "pharo-working" packages.
I think when Pharo has its own code repository should be using new monticello 2 and sourcetalk
Maybe this image can run on the same hardware but should be accessible from another URL.
Thx Torsten -- Neu: GMX FreeDSL Komplettanschluss mit DSL 6.000 Flatrate + Telefonanschluss für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr
wrote:
mariano
did you use MC2?
I tried. I even publish SqueakDBX on sourcetalk, but I have several problems. I couldn't make it work well :( However, I think having a better control version system will help pharo. Even if you have to work and spend time in MC2. I was discussed several times in different mailing lists, but I really don't like monticello. What I don't like is that I always have to save a hole package instead of a simple class or a method. The level of unit in MC (packge) is too big for me. has Pharo a plan of using a better control version system ? cheers, Mariano
I think when Pharo has its own code repository should be using new monticello 2 and sourcetalk
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (3)
-
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Torsten Bergmann