I think so. I think Stef created 10869 and I 10870. I had made the corrections and written the tests. Anyway, it is possible that I had made it bad. I thought I had commited the slice, but... If you tell me how, I will do it again. Regards 2013/7/29 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>
On Jul 29, 2013, at 2:34 PM, José Comesaña <jose.comesana@gmail.com> wrote:
It was already discussed and modified: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10869
This one is just an open report⦠no action was done. I have merged it into Issue 11222
But there is a third issue about exactly the same, this I think is from you:
10870 Corrections to Date class >>readFrom:pattern: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10870
Regards
2013/7/24 Sabine Knöfel <sabine.knoefel@gmail.com> Hi,
Date readFrom: '4.2.13' readStream pattern: 'd.m.yy'
Does not return 4.2.2013 but 4.2.0013
The comment is saying "A year given using only two decimals is considered to be >2000"
So, the comment is not ok or this is a bug?
Sabine
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bug-in-Date-readFrom-pattern-Pharo2-0-tp4700427.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.