I think so. I think Stef created 10869 and I 10870. I had made the corrections and written the tests. Anyway, it is possible that I had made it bad. I thought I had commited the slice, but...

If you tell me how, I will do it again.

Regards


2013/7/29 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>

On Jul 29, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Jos� Comesa�a <jose.comesana@gmail.com> wrote:

> It was already discussed and modified: �https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10869
>

This one is just an open report� no action was done. I have merged it into Issue 11222

But there is a third issue about exactly the same, this I think is from you:

10870 Corrections to Date class >>readFrom:pattern:
� � � � https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10870


> Regards
>
> 2013/7/24 Sabine Kn�fel <sabine.knoefel@gmail.com>
> Hi,
>
> Date readFrom: '4.2.13' readStream pattern: 'd.m.yy'
>
> Does not return 4.2.2013 but 4.2.0013
>
> The comment is saying
> "A year given using only two decimals is considered to be >2000"
>
> So, the comment is not ok or this is a bug?
>
> Sabine
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Bug-in-Date-readFrom-pattern-Pharo2-0-tp4700427.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>