Sorry for such a late answer, I was away for some time and have just managed to break through the piles of e-mails. :) If I'm not mistaken, Oak is based on Riak, i.e. external storage engine. Actually, I was talking about Smalltalk-based solution. Why do you prefer an âexternally supported backendâ? -- Best regards, Dennis Schetinin 2013/4/8 Göran Krampe <goran@krampe.se>
Hey!
On 04/06/2013 04:40 PM, Dennis Schetinin wrote:
Why Pharo or Squeak don't have a framework (based on Fuel for example) that allows to control changes, execute transaction, save some parts of image instead of whole image etc.? This could be less efficient then GemStone, but loadable on demand, customizable and usable in smaller projects. Maybe there's such a project living already? Or is it too much for modern Smalltalk?
I already posted about such a project in this thread, Oak, why didn't you notice?:
http://goran.krampe.se/2012/**12/29/oak/<http://goran.krampe.se/2012/12/29/oak/>
It's not complaining. I know the answer: there's no usable persistence
solution because I didn't create it :) I just want to know if someone else thinks the same way as I do?
Feel free to help out with Oak. It is exactly what you are asking for.
regards, Göran