Sorry for such a late answer, I was away for some time and have�just�managed to break through the piles of e-mails. :)

If I'm not mistaken, Oak is based on Riak, i.e. external storage engine. Actually, I was talking about Smalltalk-based solution. Why do you prefer an �externally supported backend�?


--

Best regards,


Dennis Schetinin



2013/4/8 G�ran Krampe <goran@krampe.se>
Hey!


On 04/06/2013 04:40 PM, Dennis Schetinin wrote:
Why Pharo or Squeak don't have a framework (based on Fuel for example)
that allows to control changes, execute transaction, save some parts of
image instead of whole image etc.? This could be less efficient then
GemStone, but loadable on demand, customizable and usable in smaller
projects. Maybe there's such a project living already? Or is it too much
for modern Smalltalk?

I already posted about such a project in this thread, Oak, why didn't you notice?:

http://goran.krampe.se/2012/12/29/oak/


It's not complaining. I know the answer: there's no usable persistence
solution because I didn't create it :) �I just want to know if someone
else thinks the same way as I do?

Feel free to help out with Oak. It is exactly what you are asking for.

regards, G�ran