Yes, the benchmark object is a nice idea. I just did not know about it Thanks to all  Abdelghani. De : Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> à: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> Cc : abdelghani ALIDRA <alidrandco@yahoo.fr> Envoyé le : Vendredi 13 novembre 2015 14h32 Objet : Re: [Pharo-users] Transcrip Show: in a loop
On 13 Nov 2015, at 14:25, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com> wrote:
Hi!
I understand your concern. However, there are better way of doing the benchmarking. Just inspect the following expression: (1 to: 10) collect: [:i | [ aLongComputation ] timeToRun ]
You can then easily graph the number, do some averageâ¦
Or even [ 1234 factorial ] benchFor: 2 seconds which gives you a nice BenchmarkResult object back
Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:06 AM, abdelghani ALIDRA <alidrandco@yahoo.fr> wrote:
Thanks Vincent,
 flush does not seem to work but I think I am going to use bench.
Abdelghani
De : Blondeau Vincent <vincent.blondeau@worldline.com> à : abdelghani ALIDRA <alidrandco@yahoo.fr>; Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> Envoyé le : Vendredi 13 novembre 2015 10h37 Objet : RE: [Pharo-users] Transcrip Show: in a loop
Hi,  For benchmarking, you should do : [ aLongComputation] bench  It is simpler that to write on Transcript the execution time.  About the writing of the messages on Transcript, that is a normal behavior. Maybe you should try âTranscript flushâ to force the message writing?  Vincent  De : Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org] De la part de abdelghani ALIDRA Envoyé : vendredi 13 novembre 2015 10:21 à : pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Objet : [Pharo-users] Transcrip Show: in a loop Â
Hi all,  In order to monitor my program performance, I am using Transcrip>>show as follows ;  10 timesRepeat:[   aLongComputation.   Transcript show: 'some message'.   ]  The thing is that the messages are not shown one after another but all together after the loop is finished, unless I put a ... self halt Is this behavior normal? is there any way to make the messages come one by one?  Thanks  Abdelghani
Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité de Worldline ne pourra être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis.
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Worldline liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.