Am 13.03.2015 um 15:13 schrieb Tommaso Dal Sasso <tommaso.dalsasso@gmail.com>:
As one of the few (maybe the only user) of Tide, I can say that it is powerful but painful ;-) Amber is changing (quite) fast, and the current version of Tide is not usable with the default version. I made some small changes to make Tide work with the current setup of Amber, but still there are a couple of "gotchas" that are needed to make it work.
I wanted to write something about that, but I am still in deep development phase. If you are really interested, I may help you setup an example project. However, as Esteban said, think twice if this is what you need. Tide is quite powerful, but unless you don't need strong integration with javascript libraries Seaside is probably easier.
Thanks. That's something I (don't) wanted to hear. :) Maybe it is because there aren't that much amber users and there are (of course) even less users of amber+tide. I personally loved the idea when first encountering tide. But I know as well there are gotchas. thanks, Norbert
Tommaso
On 13/03/15 14:51, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
As one of the authors of Tide, I wouldnât recommend to use it today⦠unless you are planning to maintain it too, because atm I do not have time to do it and Nico (the other/main author is not working on smalltalk anymore⦠nor amber or pharo). Instead, I would use Seaside+Reef :P
Esteban
On 12 Mar 2015, at 15:27, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
For an upcoming project I'm thinking about what technology to use. I think it will be seaside or amber+tide. For the latter I would like to have some experience reports.
Is anyone of you using tide and what is your experience with it?
thanks,
Norbert