Thanks for mentioning me. I would just like to point out that I made FuzzyWorld in both Pharo and VSE, but since all my applications were in VSE (which I have been using since 1985!) I have brought it to VSE for graphic content and tools I had already developped. As you can see in the first slide of my presentation, FuzzyWorld is an extension of the Smalltalk classes and not of VSE or Pharo; both can use it. Anyway, I am a Pharo member, so I have been surprised for comments on my presentation. If I can express my opinion, this discussion is based on nothing: in my opinion Pharo is Smalltalk; everything else is VAPOR WARE. Lorenzo -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Pharo-users [mailto:pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org] Per conto di horrido Inviato: mercoledì 5 febbraio 2020 19:51 A: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Oggetto: Re: [Pharo-users] About "it's not pharo but smalltalk" Yes, these are two completely different issues... - Pharo is Smalltalk - you don't want general Smalltalk discussion polluting this forum I get it. But as I point out here <http://forum.world.st/Fuzzy-Thinking-in-Smalltalk-tp5111111p5111191.html> , Pharo is in a unique position and I would hope that the Pharo community is willing to participate in evangelizing Smalltalk. If there is truly another avenue that is as effective, I'm all ears. Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
On 5 Feb 2020, at 18:50, horrido <
horrido.hobbies@
> wrote:
It would be like trying to deny that Clojure, Scheme, and Racket are not LISP. Only an imbecile would claim they're not.
I am pretty sure the mailing lists of Clojure, Scheme or Racket don't want you to go there to discuss Common Lisp or Emacs' Lisp or to talk about general lisp revivals.
Especially, they would not want you tell them what they should or can't do based on their history.
-- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html