Nov. 10, 2017
11:01 a.m.
On 11/10/17, Hilaire <hilaire@drgeo.eu> wrote:
A cleaner Pharo will help there.
To be frank, I found later Pharo releases not inspiring. Bigger, bigger and bigger with added code, protocol changes, and bugs at will. It is becoming too complicated for a hobby use of it.
I decided I will not finish porting DrGeo to P6 or P7, and it will likely die with P3.
What are the main show stoppers which make it difficult to port your application to P6?
Pharo should have been clean up to the bones before adding. It was the initial moto, no?
Le 10/11/2017 à 11:14, Marcus Denker a écrit :
It would be nice if someone who uses it would take the lead so we can improve the default that is shipped with Pharo.
-- Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu