Oct. 2, 2018
3:06 a.m.
Sounds like the user override is what we are after - I guess we need to make a pr ... sadly my laptop has died so itâs not going to be me for a little while until I can find an Apple store on my travels. Tim Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Oct 2018, at 12:30, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 23:16, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote: Tim Mackinnon wrote
either by showing {owner}/{project}
What about when there are multiple remotes?
+1 to what you imply here, that the owner/remote should not be auto-coded into the project name. Remote are well handled within Iceberg. The user though could add the owner as free text into a custom project name i.e. "owner-project"
cheers -ben