Sounds like the user override is what we are after - I guess we need to make a pr ... sadly my laptop has died so it���s not going to be me for a little while until I can find an Apple store on my travels.

Tim

Sent from my iPhone

On 2 Oct 2018, at 12:30, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:



On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 23:16, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Tim Mackinnon wrote
> either by showing {owner}/{project}

What about when there are multiple remotes?

+1 to what you imply here, that the owner/remote should not be auto-coded into the project name.
Remote are well handled within Iceberg.
The user though could add the owner as free text into a custom project name i.e. "owner-project"

cheers -ben