I liked it. Actually I thought it was Richard's most balanced piece to date - except the poke in the cl paragraph. Something softer like "Pharo might not be right for you, but its worth taking a look at" would be better. And for spreading the word, perhaps controversy is better than being ignored - hard to know though. Duty calls... https://xkcd.com/386/ btw, in the linked study interesting to see that Excel has even better function point efficiency than Smalltalk - which reminds me, Excel provides a workable "Image" analogy. The data shares the same file as the code. cheers -ben On 16 November 2017 at 17:07, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:
Please, please, please, stop to write such kind of articles. You are doing a really bad service to us. You can help to Pharo in many other ways. You will not convince people to use Pharo by spitting on everything else. One fixed typo has incomparably bigger value than blogpost like this.
-- Pavel
2017-11-16 5:13 GMT+01:00 horrido <horrido.hobbies@gmail.com>:
Why Pharo Might be the Future of Software Development <https://blog.appacademy.io/pharo-future-software-development/>
Spread the word.
-- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html