I liked it. Actually I thought it was Richard's most balanced piece to date - except the poke in the cl paragraph.�� Something softer like "Pharo might not be right for you, but its worth taking a look at"�� would be better.

And for spreading the word, perhaps controversy is better than being ignored - hard to know though.��

Duty calls... https://xkcd.com/386/

btw, in the linked study interesting to see that Excel has even better function point efficiency than Smalltalk - which reminds me, Excel provides a workable "Image" analogy. The data shares the same file as the code.

cheers -ben

On 16 November 2017 at 17:07, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:

Please, please, please, stop to write such kind of articles. You are doing a really bad service to us. You can help to Pharo in many other ways. You will not��convince people to use Pharo by��spitting on everything else.��
One fixed typo has��incomparably bigger value than blogpost like this.

-- Pavel

2017-11-16 5:13 GMT+01:00 horrido <horrido.hobbies@gmail.com>:
Why Pharo Might be the Future of Software Development
<https://blog.appacademy.io/pharo-future-software-development/>

Spread the word.

--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html