2014-10-23 17:04 GMT-03:00 Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
Why do you use the pharo shell script instead of pharo-vm with --no-display? Is there any benefit other than having the pwd set to the image location? And hence, the argument script should be relative to the image.
No particular reason, mostly because I hate adding the --no-display But yes, I usually bypass the script and use the executable directly.
I don't know how Pharo resolves the file names by default. Pharo's FileLocator seems to provide something similar to the Dolphin's FileLocator I'm used to work with (see attached image) to avoid the "resolution guessing" of relative paths when defined in the context of a script or app code (e.g. to specify template files). I should use it more. :)
All this sharing, talking & discussing, even over small issues and style is important, we can all learn a lot from each other and save time and money.
Absolutely. I'd like to know the development process of others, from SCM to building, deploying and server provisioning. After a year o Pharo development I think I'm ready to embrace a CI server (I already use scripts to build images), but I think I will move all my repositories to git before. However, my remote server provisioning is still manual, and too rudimentary even for my own taste. If I could speed up this, I would deliver features faster to my customers. Now everything runs inside a two week sprint window. Regards, Esteban A. Maringolo
