Nov. 7, 2013
9:07 p.m.
>From memory:
- 11920 (the valueHolder one)
- 12054 (TreeNode and TreeColumn)
- There is one also about SpecMenu, I do not remember the number
Ben
On 07 Nov 2013, at 21:10, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 6:45 PM, Benjamin <Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> About table, I have an example which will be running soon in Pharo (the changes are waiting to be integrated)
>
> which ones?
> Because I was crawling all the ones I could?
>
> Stef
>
>
>>
>> tree := TreeModel new.
>> tree openWithSpec.
>>
>> tree columns: (Array
>> with: (TreeColumnModel new displayBlock: [:node | node content first asString ]; headerLabel: 'Name'; yourself)
>> with: (TreeColumnModel new displayBlock: [:node | node content second asString ]; headerLabel: 'Last Name'; yourself)
>> with: (TreeColumnModel new displayBlock: [:node | node content third asString ]; headerLabel: 'Age'; yourself)
>> with: (TreeColumnModel new displayBlock: [:node | node content fourth asString ]; headerLabel: 'Gender'; yourself)).
>>
>> tree roots: {
>> {'Benjamin'.'Van Ryseghem'.'26'.'M'}.
>> {'Pamela'.'Anderson'.'Far too much'.'F'}
>> }
>>
>> Will produce
>>
>> <Screen Shot 2013-11-07 at 18.38.21.png>
>>
>> Right now, you can get the same by
>> - adding MorphTreeAdapter>>#columns:
>> columns: columns
>> self widgetDo: [ :w |
>> w columns: columns.
>> w resizerChanged.
>> w updateList ]
>>
>> And then evaluating:
>>
>> tree := TreeModel new.
>> tree openWithSpec.
>>
>> tree columns: (Array
>> with: (MorphTreeColumn new rowMorphGetSelector: [:node | node item first asString asMorph ]; headerButtonLabel: 'Name' font: nil; yourself)
>> with: (MorphTreeColumn new rowMorphGetSelector: [:node | node item second asString asMorph ]; headerButtonLabel: 'Last Name' font: nil; yourself)
>> with: (MorphTreeColumn new rowMorphGetSelector: [:node | node item third asString asMorph ]; headerButtonLabel: 'Age' font: nil; yourself)
>> with: (MorphTreeColumn new rowMorphGetSelector: [:node | node item fourth asString asMorph ]; headerButtonLabel: 'Gender' font: nil; yourself)).
>>
>> tree roots: {
>> {'Benjamin'.'Van Ryseghem'.'26'.'M'}.
>> {'Pamela'.'Anderson'.'Far too much'.'F'}
>> }
>>
>> Ben
>>
>> On 07 Nov 2013, at 15:54, Clément Bera <bera.clement@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 2013/11/7 Benjamin <Benjamin.VanRyseghem.Pharo@gmail.com>
>>> Just a general remark: you should try as much as possible to avoid hard coding width/height :)
>>>
>>> there are some methods on ComposableModel you could use like buttonHeight toolbarHeight etc. that you should use instead :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Ben
>>>
>>> On 07 Nov 2013, at 13:22, Bahman Movaqar <Bahman@BahmanM.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/07/2013 12:45, Clément Bera wrote:
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know what you want exactly.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can do:
>>>>>
>>>>> spec
>>>>> <spec>
>>>>> ^ SpecLayout composed
>>>>> newRow: [:row |
>>>>> row
>>>>> newColumn: [ :col |
>>>>> col
>>>>> add: #list width: 135;
>>>>> add: #description ] ];
>>>>> yourself
>>>>>
>>>>> and nest that as many times as you want (but I don't know if this was your question).
>>>>
>>>> I just tried this one and it works (see the code below) BUT, the code is so hard to read and understand just for 3 rows and 7 widgets!
>>>>
>>>> <code>
>>>> defaultSpec
>>>> ^ SpecLayout composed
>>>> newColumn: [ :mainColumn |
>>>> mainColumn
>>>> newRow: [ :nameRow |
>>>> nameRow
>>>> add: #labelName;
>>>> add: #textName ]
>>>> height: 25.
>>>> mainColumn
>>>> newRow: [ :titleRow |
>>>> titleRow
>>>> add: #labelTitle;
>>>> newRow: [ :titleRadioRow |
>>>> titleRadioRow
>>>> add: #radioMr;
>>>> add: #radioMrs;
>>>> add: #radioMs ] ]
>>>> height: 25.
>>>> mainColumn newRow: [ :buttonRow | buttonRow add: #buttonGreet ] height: 25 ];
>>>> yourself
>>>> </code>
>>>>
>>>> Am I doing it right?
>>>
>>> I guess this is right. But I think you need to generate this layout out of collections, not to write it.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Another feature is:
>>>>>
>>>>> debuggerSpec
>>>>> <spec: #default>
>>>>> ^ SpecLayout composed
>>>>> add: #inspector withSpec: #debuggerSpec;
>>>>> yourself
>>>>>
>>>>> #inspector being the instance variable name that holds a subclass of ComposableModel that defines class side #debuggerSpec, which answers a SpecLayout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Does this mean that for every table cell I have to create a new class?
>>>
>>> Yeah well I was just pointing out all the choices you had. Depending on what you want to do you could have a class hierarchy similar to this:
>>>
>>> SpecTable
>>> AbstractSpecColumn
>>> SpecColumnA
>>> SpecColumnB
>>> AbstractSpecCell
>>> SpecCellA
>>> SpecCellB
>>>
>>> SpecTable having column, column having cells.
>>> But this may not be the best choice.
>>>
>>> Now that you caught my interest, I tried to do a table. I put it in attachment the result. It is a .st file, so drag and drop it in your image, then click file in entire file. Then try to run 'SpecTable new', it opens a table with 3 columns and 5 rows, with no complex layout method. All the code is in SpecTable (Cmd+f,Cmd+c to find a class in nautilus or write the class name in workspace then select it and press Cmd+m), in the method protocol table logic. It's like 6 methods.
>>>
>>> However:
>>> - vertical splitters are not sync.
>>> - I don't know how to color the border of each cell to make it beautiful.
>>>
>>> Of course you need to polish it ...
>>>
>>> I hope it helped you :)
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Not sure if this helped.
>>>>>
>>>>> All of these questions are for your tutorials ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/11/7 Bahman Movaqar <Bahman@bahmanm.com>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it possible to nest layouts in Spec? For example can I combine
>>>>> `SpecColumnLayout` and `SpecRowLayout` together?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bahman Movaqar (http://BahmanM.com)
>>>>>
>>>>> ERP Evaluation, Implementation & Deployment Consultant
>>>>> PGP Key ID: 0x6AB5BD68 (keyserver2.pgp.com)
>>>>> --
>>>>> Bahman Movaqar (http://BahmanM.com)
>>>>>
>>>>> ERP Evaluation, Implementation & Deployment Consultant
>>>>> PGP Key ID: 0x6AB5BD68 (keyserver2.pgp.com)
>>>
>>>
>>> <SpecTable.st>
>>
>