On 30 Nov 2015, at 22:08, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
true. We use them a lot
Good to know, we're currently deploying an upgrade to our server park, all new machines (32 cores, 96 Gb RAM each) will be running many LXC/LXD instances, probably using ZFS for their storage. The networking was the biggest challenge, but I think we got that covered. In any case, Pharo ran perfectly on them (either 32 or 64 bit) ! If we get stuck on something, I will know who I can beg for help ;-)
+1
Norbert
Am 30.11.2015 um 21:48 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
LXC/LXD containers are much nicer, IMHO, as they look and feel like a regular VM, yet are way more efficient.
On 30 Nov 2015, at 21:43, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo@gmail.com> wrote:
Do you have a recipe to put Pharo in a Docker container? Esteban A. Maringolo
2015-11-30 17:34 GMT-03:00 phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be>:
I have been using Pharo somewhat less in my current projects.
Nevertheless, I needed a tool done fast and behaving correctly.
Did it the TDD way with Pharo.
Great experience. Great productivity. No messing around with external libraries, modules...
64-bit Linux compatibility would really help these days. But stuffing Pharo and 32 bit on a docker container works nicely too.
Phil