Am 05.02.2020 um 19:02 schrieb horrido <horrido.hobbies@gmail.com>:

You want to take the Smalltalk heritage as a definition, thatâs ok. We
donât, and thatâs ok too. Is about what we want to do.
Who's "we"?
As you have obviously trouble reading our web site for instructions like bug reporting or other things I copy the footer for you. â Pharo is developed by an international community of open-source developers, coordinated and maintained by the pharo consortium and receives essential support from Inria, RMOD, CNRS, UDL, Cristal and many others.â So we are a lot of core developers, Inria staff, consortium members and pharo board although Iâm not speaking on their behalf.
Last time I checked, nobody owns Pharo. Pharo is not a bunch of core developers; it's a community. And I believe there are many Pharoers who share my view.
Where did you check?
Since I'm a Smalltalk evangelist and not a Pharo evangelist, I guess I shouldn't ever mention Pharo in my blog. After all, if it's not Smalltalk, why should I promote it???
It is your initiative, you should know, nobody asked you to do it
In fact, this is disastrous for my JRMPC competition since it's based entirely on Pharo. I'm promoting Smalltalk but pushing Pharo on all the participating teams??? What the f*ck am I doing?!!
I just know that you are reluctant for a very long time to hear what we are saying. The rest is yours Norbert
-- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html