[Pharo-project] Updating VM links for Pharo 1.1
Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I suggest to fix this problem. You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646 Mac: 4.2.5 Windows: 4.0.2 Linux: 4.0.3.2202 What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section of Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and 1.1. Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm has FreeType compiled. Cheers Mariano
We should move to Mac 5.0 for 1.2 Stef On Jul 7, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I suggest to fix this problem.
You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646
Mac: 4.2.5 Windows: 4.0.2 Linux: 4.0.3.2202
What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section of Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and 1.1. Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm has FreeType compiled.
Cheers
Mariano _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com>:
Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I suggest to fix this problem.
You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646
Mac: 4.2.5 Windows: 4.0.2 Linux: 4.0.3.2202
What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section of Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and 1.1. Are there problems with it ? Â The only thing I can image is if the vm has FreeType compiled.
Hi Mariano, maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs. And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know wich VMs they used. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich < serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com>:
Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I suggest to fix this problem.
You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646
Mac: 4.2.5 Windows: 4.0.2 Linux: 4.0.3.2202
What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section of Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and 1.1. Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm has FreeType compiled.
Hi Mariano,
maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs. And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know wich VMs they used.
+1. I completly agree. Adrian, could you do this please? Thanks Mariano
Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
I'm a bit confused. Do we want to have a separate set of VMs or not? Furthermore, the link to the Unix VM just goes to http://squeakvm.org/unix/, but not to a particular version. Cheers, Adrian On Jul 7, 2010, at 14:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich < serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com>:
Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I suggest to fix this problem.
You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646
Mac: 4.2.5 Windows: 4.0.2 Linux: 4.0.3.2202
What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section of Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and 1.1. Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm has FreeType compiled.
Hi Mariano,
maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs. And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know wich VMs they used.
+1. I completly agree.
Adrian, could you do this please?
Thanks
Mariano
Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
I'm a bit confused. Do we want to have a separate set of VMs or not?
Yes, I vote to put them separated.
Furthermore, the link to the Unix VM just goes to http://squeakvm.org/unix/, but not to a particular version.
As far as I know, there is not way to link to a particular version. You can, but to a particular version/platform (for example, GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, etc...)
Cheers, Adrian
On Jul 7, 2010, at 14:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich < serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com>:
Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I suggest to fix this problem.
You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646
Mac: 4.2.5 Windows: 4.0.2 Linux: 4.0.3.2202
What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section of Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and 1.1. Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm has FreeType compiled.
Hi Mariano,
maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs. And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know wich VMs they used.
+1. I completly agree.
Adrian, could you do this please?
Thanks
Mariano
Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
One concern: having separate download links in no way tells us what vm someone uses with a particular version, and we can't assume that it does. ________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Mariano Martinez Peck [marianopeck@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 6:11 PM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Updating VM links for Pharo 1.1 On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch<mailto:adi@netstyle.ch>> wrote: I'm a bit confused. Do we want to have a separate set of VMs or not? Yes, I vote to put them separated. Furthermore, the link to the Unix VM just goes to http://squeakvm.org/unix/, but not to a particular version. As far as I know, there is not way to link to a particular version. You can, but to a particular version/platform (for example, GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, etc...) Cheers, Adrian On Jul 7, 2010, at 14:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich < serge.stinckwich@gmail.com<mailto:serge.stinckwich@gmail.com>> wrote:
2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com<mailto:marianopeck@gmail.com>>:
Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I suggest to fix this problem.
You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646
Mac: 4.2.5 Windows: 4.0.2 Linux: 4.0.3.2202
What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section of Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and 1.1. Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm has FreeType compiled.
Hi Mariano,
maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs. And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know wich VMs they used.
+1. I completly agree.
Adrian, could you do this please?
Thanks
Mariano
Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
- I updated the Mac VM link to point to version 4.2.5beta1U. This version certainly also makes sense for Pharo 1.0. - I didn't change the other links since the Windows one already points to the proposed version (4.0.2) and the Unix link does not point to a specific version. So no need to have a separate set of links if they are all the same. Does that make sense? Cheers, Adrian On Jul 8, 2010, at 02:59 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
One concern: having separate download links in no way tells us what vm someone uses with a particular version, and we can't assume that it does.
________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Mariano Martinez Peck [marianopeck@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 6:11 PM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Updating VM links for Pharo 1.1
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch<mailto:adi@netstyle.ch>> wrote: I'm a bit confused. Do we want to have a separate set of VMs or not?
Yes, I vote to put them separated.
Furthermore, the link to the Unix VM just goes to http://squeakvm.org/unix/, but not to a particular version.
As far as I know, there is not way to link to a particular version. You can, but to a particular version/platform (for example, GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, etc...)
Cheers, Adrian
On Jul 7, 2010, at 14:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich < serge.stinckwich@gmail.com<mailto:serge.stinckwich@gmail.com>> wrote:
2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com<mailto:marianopeck@gmail.com>>:
Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I suggest to fix this problem.
You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646
Mac: 4.2.5 Windows: 4.0.2 Linux: 4.0.3.2202
What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section of Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and 1.1. Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm has FreeType compiled.
Hi Mariano,
maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs. And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know wich VMs they used.
+1. I completly agree.
Adrian, could you do this please?
Thanks
Mariano
Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
- I updated the Mac VM link to point to version 4.2.5beta1U. This version certainly also makes sense for Pharo 1.0.
Great,
- I didn't change the other links since the Windows one already points to the proposed version (4.0.2)
great
and the Unix link does not point to a specific version.
maybe we can put in parentheses the version? something like: Unix (4.0.3.2202) or something like that? So no need to have a separate set of links if they are all the same.
I guess. I am not sure if Unix 4.0.3.2202 has FreeType compiled (for 1.0). Can someone tell us this?
Does that make sense?
Cheers, Adrian
On Jul 8, 2010, at 02:59 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
One concern: having separate download links in no way tells us what vm someone uses with a particular version, and we can't assume that it does.
________________________________________ From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [ pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Mariano Martinez Peck [marianopeck@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 6:11 PM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Updating VM links for Pharo 1.1
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch<mailto: adi@netstyle.ch>> wrote: I'm a bit confused. Do we want to have a separate set of VMs or not?
Yes, I vote to put them separated.
Furthermore, the link to the Unix VM just goes to http://squeakvm.org/unix/, but not to a particular version.
As far as I know, there is not way to link to a particular version. You can, but to a particular version/platform (for example, GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, etc...)
Cheers, Adrian
On Jul 7, 2010, at 14:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich < serge.stinckwich@gmail.com<mailto:serge.stinckwich@gmail.com>> wrote:
2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com<mailto: marianopeck@gmail.com>>:
Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I suggest to fix this problem.
You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646
Mac: 4.2.5 Windows: 4.0.2 Linux: 4.0.3.2202
What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section of Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and 1.1. Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm has FreeType compiled.
Hi Mariano,
maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs. And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know wich VMs they used.
+1. I completly agree.
Adrian, could you do this please?
Thanks
Mariano
Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Hello What plans about Cog? It will be good if you provide builded Cog VM with prepared Pharo release image.
2010/7/8 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com>
Hello
What plans about Cog?
It will be good if you provide builded Cog VM with prepared Pharo release image.
I think this thread is for discussing which VMs to officialy link for Pharo 1.0 (released) and 1.1 (soon). Cog will be for 1.2, not 1.1. At least, the default generated images. So, I agree it would be cool to upload Cog VMs for each OS but it have to be clear that only Pharo 1.2 should work out of the box with Cog. Who can compile such VMs for us? Cheers Mariano
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (6)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Denis Kudriashov -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Schwab,Wilhelm K -
Serge Stinckwich -
Stéphane Ducasse