- I updated the Mac VM link to point to version 4.2.5beta1U. This version certainly also makes sense for Pharo 1.0.

- I didn't change the other links since the Windows one already points to the proposed version (4.0.2)

and the Unix link does not point to a specific version.

So no need to have a separate set of links if they are all the same.

Does that make sense?

Cheers,
Adrian

On Jul 8, 2010, at 02:59 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

> One concern: having separate download links in no way tells us what vm someone uses with a particular version, and we can't assume that it does.
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Mariano Martinez Peck [marianopeck@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 6:11 PM
> To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Updating VM links for Pharo 1.1
>
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch<mailto:adi@netstyle.ch>> wrote:
> I'm a bit confused. Do we want to have a separate set of VMs or not?
>
> Yes, I vote to put them separated.
>
> Furthermore, the link to the Unix VM just goes to http://squeakvm.org/unix/, but not to a particular version.
>
>
> As far as I know, there is not way to link to a particular version. You can, but to a particular version/platform (for example, GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, etc...)
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
>
> On Jul 7, 2010, at 14:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich <
>> serge.stinckwich@gmail.com<mailto:serge.stinckwich@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com<mailto:marianopeck@gmail.com>>:
>>>> Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo
>>>> 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I
>>> suggest
>>>> to fix this problem.
>>>>
>>>> You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646
>>>>
>>>> Mac:
>>>> 4.2.5
>>>> Windows:
>>>> 4.0.2
>>>> Linux:
>>>> 4.0.3.2202
>>>>
>>>> What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section
>>> of
>>>> Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the
>>>> last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and
>>> 1.1.
>>>> Are there problems with it ? � The only thing I can image is if the vm
>>> has
>>>> FreeType compiled.
>>>
>>> Hi Mariano,
>>>
>>> maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs.
>>> And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know
>>> wich VMs they used.
>>>
>>
>> +1. I completly agree.
>>
>> Adrian, could you do this please?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Mariano
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Serge Stinckwich
>>> UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam
>>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>>> http://doesnotunderstand.org/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr<mailto:Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr>
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project