On Jul 7, 2010, at 14:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich <
>
serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianopeck@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo
>>> 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I
>> suggest
>>> to fix this problem.
>>>
>>> You can see in
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646
>>>
>>> Mac:
>>> 4.2.5
>>> Windows:
>>> 4.0.2
>>> Linux:
>>> 4.0.3.2202
>>>
>>> What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section
>> of
>>> Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the
>>> last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and
>> 1.1.
>>> Are there problems with it ? � The only thing I can image is if the vm
>> has
>>> FreeType compiled.
>>
>> Hi Mariano,
>>
>> maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs.
>> And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know
>> wich VMs they used.
>>
>
> +1. I completly agree.
>
> Adrian, could you do this please?
>
> Thanks
>
> Mariano
>
>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Serge Stinckwich
>> UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam
>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>>
http://doesnotunderstand.org/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
>
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project