[Pharo-project] Is RPackage dead?
hi stef, I think I'm not the only one who didnt follow so close as you, Marcus, Igor, ... so please could you explain more in detail: - Problems mentioned with RPackage, Nautilus - why throw RPackage away and get stuck with the old browsers? I thought getting real packages was one of our most important tasks, so I could not understand you prefer solution A? Thanks T. -- NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone
On Oct 28, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
hi stef,
I think I'm not the only one who didnt follow so close as you, Marcus, Igor, ... so please could you explain more in detail:
- Problems mentioned with RPackage, Nautilus
RPackage works well now to integrate: be the backbone of pharo, it should replace package info and package organizer and this is work.
- why throw RPackage away and get stuck with the old browsers?
I thought getting real packages was one of our most important tasks, so I could not understand you prefer solution A?
because I was tired. And because pharo does not go fast enough to me because we drag a lot of features. Because we are not enough doing core development. But nothing that we can really change.
Thanks T.
participants (2)
-
Stéphane Ducasse -
Torsten Bergmann