Oct. 31, 2011
8:39 p.m.
On Oct 28, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
hi stef,
I think I'm not the only one who didnt follow so close as you, Marcus, Igor, ... so please could you explain more in detail:
- Problems mentioned with RPackage, Nautilus
RPackage works well now to integrate: be the backbone of pharo, it should replace package info and package organizer and this is work.
- why throw RPackage away and get stuck with the old browsers?
I thought getting real packages was one of our most important tasks, so I could not understand you prefer solution A?
because I was tired. And because pharo does not go fast enough to me because we drag a lot of features. Because we are not enough doing core development. But nothing that we can really change.
Thanks T.