Hi Folks, Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo? (I could not find an issue in the Pharo issues database.) I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have been resolved. Is anyone on this topic? Is there a good reason to stick with the old MC? Cheers, - on
Hi Folks,
Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo? (I could not find an issue in the Pharo issues database.)
I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have been resolved. Is anyone on this topic? Is there a good reason to stick with the old MC?
-support -open and public repository aka SS2 -understanding -process -tools at least for me. So we will but not now our plate is quite full. Stef
Sounds reasonable. Nevertheless, it should be flagged somewhere. Should it be an issue, or should it be on one of the wiki pages? I searched, but found nothing. Is this the right page? http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ToDoBetterOnLongTerm - on On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi Folks,
Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo? (I could not find an issue in the Pharo issues database.)
I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have been resolved. Is anyone on this topic? Is there a good reason to stick with the old MC?
-support -open and public repository aka SS2 -understanding -process -tools
at least for me. So we will but not now our plate is quite full.
Stef
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
yes Stef On Apr 9, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote:
Sounds reasonable.
Nevertheless, it should be flagged somewhere. Should it be an issue, or should it be on one of the wiki pages?
I searched, but found nothing.
Is this the right page?
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ToDoBetterOnLongTerm
- on
On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi Folks,
Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo? (I could not find an issue in the Pharo issues database.)
I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have been resolved. Is anyone on this topic? Is there a good reason to stick with the old MC?
-support -open and public repository aka SS2 -understanding -process -tools
at least for me. So we will but not now our plate is quite full.
Stef
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz <oscar@iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
Sounds reasonable.
Nevertheless, it should be flagged somewhere. Should it be an issue, or should it be on one of the wiki pages?
I searched, but found nothing.
Is this the right page?
In milestone 3, there is an item called: "better source management ". I don't know If this is related to control version.
- on
On Apr 9, 2009, at 8:54, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Hi Folks,
Are there plans to integrate Monticello 2 into Pharo? (I could not find an issue in the Pharo issues database.)
I understand from Lukas that most of the bootstrapping issues have been resolved. Is anyone on this topic? Is there a good reason to stick with the old MC?
-support -open and public repository aka SS2 -understanding -process -tools
at least for me. So we will but not now our plate is quite full.
Stef
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (3)
-
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Oscar Nierstrasz -
Stéphane Ducasse